Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 4771208

Binocular masking level differences in sinusoidal grating detection.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G B Henning, B G Hertz. 1973. Binocular masking level differences in sinusoidal grating detection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(73)90243-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The direction of retinal motion facilitates binocular stereopsis.

Visual information from binocular disparity and from relative motion provide information about three-dimensional structure and layout of the world. Although the mechanisms that process these cues have typically been studied independently, there is now a substantial body of evidence that suggests that they interact in the visual pathway. This paper investigates one advantage of such an interaction: whether retinal motion can be used as a matching constraint in the binocular correspondence process. Stimuli that contained identical disparity and motion signals but which differed in their fine-scale correlation were created to establish whether the direction, or the speed, of motion could enhance performance in a psychophysical task in which binocular matching is a limiting factor. The results of these experiments provide clear evidence that different directions of motion, but not different speeds, are processed separately in stereopsis. The results fit well with properties of neurons early in the cortical visual pathway which are thought to be involved in determining local matches between features in the two eyes' images.

Depth Perception

Perceptual categories for spatial layout.

The central problems of vision are often divided into object identification and localization. Object identification, at least at fine levels of discrimination, may require the application of top-down knowledge to resolve ambiguous image information. Utilizing top-down knowledge, however, may require the initial rapid access of abstract object categories based on low-level image cues. Does object localization require a different set of operating principles than object identification or is category determination also part of the perception of depth and spatial layout? Three-dimensional graphics movies of objects and their cast shadows are used to argue that identifying perceptual categories is important for determining the relative depths of objects. Processes that can identify the causal class (e.g. the kind of material) that generates the image data can provide information to determine the spatial relationships between surfaces. Changes in the blurriness of an edge may be characteristically associated with shadows caused by relative motion between two surfaces. The early identification of abstract events such as moving object/shadow pairs may also be important for depth from shadows. Knowledge of how correlated motion in the image relates to an object and its shadow may provide a reliable cue to access such event categories.

Depth Perception