Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 4762189

Density changes in lactose tablets.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Hersey, J E Rees, E T Cole. 1973. Density changes in lactose tablets.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600621243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters.

The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of cross section, edge geometry and structural hardness on torque transmission between square wire and bracket. For this purpose, 5 different brands of stainless steel square wire in 3 dimensions (0.016" x 0.016", 0.016" x 0.022" and 0.017" x 0.025") were inserted into edgewise brackets with a slot size of 0.018" and loaded with different torques (1 and 3 Ncm). The slot and wire geometries were analyzed by computer on ground specimens before and after loading. In addition, the Vickers hardness and micro-hardness of the unstressed and stressed metal surfaces were determined. While the slot size was very accurately maintained, the wire dimensions deviated downwards by an average of 10%. Torque transmission led to notching and bending-up phenomena on the bracket slot flanks. A torque loading of 3 Ncm increased the torque play of 0.016" x 0.022" wires by 3.6 degrees, and of 0.017" x 0.025" wires by 3.7 degrees. In the case of 0.016" x 0.016" wires, an effective torque transmission was no longer possible. The average Vickers hardness of the wires was 533 kp/mm2, and that of the brackets 145 kp/mm2. The micro-hardness in the deformation area of stressed internal slot walls increased with increasing load transmission from 204 to 338 kp/mm2. As a result of excessively small wire dimensions and plastic deformation of the brackets, a relatively large torque play occurs. Deformation and notching in the area of the internal slot walls are inconsistent with demands for recycling brackets. A standardization of bracket wire systems stating the actual torque play would be desirable.

Hardness↗

Studies in vitro of abrasion by different manual toothbrush heads and a standard toothpaste.

BACKGROUND: Loss of dentine at the buccal cervical region of teeth has a multifactorial aetiology. However, a considerable amount of circumstantial evidence, supported by laboratory experiments, implicates toothbrushing with toothpaste as a consistent factor. Most interest has centred around the abrasivity of toothpastes, particularly since a toothbrush alone has negligible effects on dentine. The influence of filament stiffness on toothpaste abrasion was the subject of some studies, mostly at least 2 decades ago, and produced conflicting conclusions. Numerous changes to toothbrush design and construction have taken place in recent years. AIMS: The aim of this study was to measure the abrasion of a standard substrate, acrylic, by a standard toothpaste carried on modern brands of toothbrushes classified by manufacturers as hard (3 brands), medium (3 brands) and soft (6 brands). METHOD: The substrate was brushed for 20,000 strokes with at least 6 heads from each brand. Measurements of substrate loss were made at 5000 stroke increments by profilometry. RESULTS: Substrate loss for all brushes showed a pattern of abrasion which was to a first approximation linear. Overall, hard brushes caused least abrasion and soft brushes the most, with differences between groups being significant. Within-group differences between brands reached significance for soft and medium brushes but not hard brushes. CONCLUSIONS: The results could be explained by increased retention of toothpaste by smaller diameter filaments and denser tufts on soft brushes and the greater flexion of filaments increasing the area of contact with the surface. Calculations on the clinical outcome of these data in vitro indicate that toothbrushing with toothpaste alone would produce minimal damage to dentine even over many years. Differences between brushes therefore are probably of little clinical significance. Certainly, the data do not support the use of hard brushes, particularly in view of the potential detrimental effects to gingival tissues.

Hardness↗