PubMed · 4648532
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A A Sharp. 1972. Coagulometers.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.25.11.1011-a
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A pharmacy-managed protocol for warfarin use in orthopedic surgery patients was studied. In 1990 a protocol designed to accommodate either protocol- or physician-determined dosing of warfarin for orthopedic antithrombotic prophylaxis (OAP) was implemented at a community hospital. A "protocol" group consisting of patients treated entirely under the protocol-determined dosing option was prospectively identified over a two-year period. A "physician" group consisting of patients treated by physicians in the 10 months immediately preceding implementation of the protocol was also identified. The ability of the protocol to achieve laboratory-test and clinical goals was assessed by comparing the two groups. The proportion of patients who received OAP increased from 89% for the physician group to 98% for the protocol group. Mean prothrombin times (PTs) were significantly higher in the protocol group only on postoperative day 2; 66% of all PTs beyond post-operative day 1 in the protocol group were within the targeted range, which reflected an International Normalized Ratio of 1.6-3.2. The frequencies of clinically apparent postoperative thrombotic events and bleeding episodes were low in each group and comparable to literature values. Analysis of protocol-group patients with PTs of > 20 seconds indicated that lower weight, female sex, and blood loss during surgery were associated with an elevated PT. The protocol was revised to provide for a lower initial warfarin dose in elderly women. A pharmacy-managed protocol for dosing warfarin achieved therapeutic goals and promoted nearly universal use of OAP in patients undergoing high-risk orthopedic surgery.
Resistance to activated protein C is a recently discovered genetic defect with a high prevalence in adult patients with thromboembolic disease. It is an autosomal dominant disorder and is ten times more common in these patients than antithrombin III-, protein C- and protein S deficiency together. In spite of this high prevalence among adults with thromboembolic disease no clinical manifestation in infancy so far has been reported. We describe a 4-year-old boy with a complex cardiac malformation and inherited resistance to activated protein C, who developed multiple thromboses after cardiac catheterization in early infancy. Conclusion. Resistance to activated protein C can cause thrombosis in infants and children if additional risk factors for the development of thrombosis are present.
UNLABELLED: Two unrelated female infants with homozygous protein C (Pr C) deficiency are reported. Both are of U.K. Pakistani origin and in each case the parents are consanguinous. A previous sibling had died in each family. Both sets of parents were shown to be carriers. The concentration of Pr C in both infants was low at birth. Both developed necrotic skin lesions (purpura fulminans) and responded well to Pr C concentrate. Both are developing normally although one has visual impairment due to retinal artery thrombosis which occurred before treatment was commenced. Both infants are treated with intravenous Pr C concentrate administered daily by the parents at home. Studies of the half-life of exogenous Pr C in one of the patients has shown an increase from 2.7 to 10.8 h during the course of treatment thus enabling it to be administered once daily while still maintaining effective plasma concentrations. In the other patient half-life has fluctuated but Pr C is also given once daily. This is the first report of this condition being treated in this way in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: Infusion of Pr C is a safe and efficient way of treating infants with homozygous Pr C deficiency in the medium term.