Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 460846

Problems in recording arthroscopy.

E Eriksson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Several good combinations of photographic equipment are available today for recording arthroscopies. Some of them are so simple to use that everyone can obtain good still pictures through the arthroscope. It is usually preferable to enlarge the arthroscopic pictures in order to get better slides for presentations during lectures and at scientific meetings. Movie film and video tape offer a more dynamic recording but are both fairly expensive. The use of video tape can cause problems during presentations to larger audiences. Video tape, however, can be transferred to 16 mm. movie film, which is the international standard in the teaching world. Color TV has three different standards in different parts of the world and there are at least four different video casette systems available today.

Explore related subjects

DocumentationEndoscopyHumansKnee JointMethodsMotion PicturesPhotographyVideotape RecordingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Eriksson. 1979. Problems in recording arthroscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/460846/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization.

Despite enormous energies invested in authoring clinical practice guidelines, the quality of individual guidelines varies considerably. The Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS) was convened in April 2002 to define a standard for guideline reporting that would promote guideline quality and facilitate implementation. Twenty-three people with expertise and experience in guideline development, dissemination, and implementation participated. A list of candidate guideline components was assembled from the Institute of Medicine Provisional Instrument for Assessing Clinical Guidelines, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Guideline Elements Model, and other published guideline models. In a 2-stage modified Delphi process, panelists first rated their agreement with the statement that "[Item name] is a necessary component of practice guidelines" on a 9-point scale. An individualized report was prepared for each panelist; the report summarized the panelist's rating for each item and the median and dispersion of rankings of all the panelists. In a second round, panelists separately rated necessity for validity and necessity for practical application. Items achieving a median rank of 7 or higher on either scale, with low disagreement index, were retained as necessary guideline components. Representatives of 22 organizations active in guideline development reviewed the proposed items and commented favorably. Closely related items were consolidated into 18 topics to create the COGS checklist. This checklist provides a framework to support more comprehensive documentation of practice guidelines. Most organizations that are active in guideline development found the component items to be comprehensive and to fit within their existing development methods.

Documentation↗
PubMed2003

Java editor for biological pathways.

SUMMARY: A visual Java-based tool for drawing and annotating biological pathways was developed. This tool integrates the possibilities of charting elements with different attributes (size, color, labels), drawing connections between elements in distinct characteristics (color, structure, width, arrows), as well as adding links to molecular biology databases, promoter sequences, information on the function of the genes or gene products, and references. It is easy to use and system independent. The result of the editing process is a PNG (portable network graphics) file for the images and XML (extended markup language) file for the appropriate links.

Documentation↗