PubMed · 4566616
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Pauwen. 1972. [Repeated cesarean sections].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4566616/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Since 1997, the Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System (KISS) has collected data on surgical site infections (SSIs) following Caesarean delivery (CD). The aim of this study was to determine whether surveillance and feedback of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) could reduce the infection rate after CD. Only departments that had participated in KISS for at least three years were included in the analysis. The CD infection rates of the first, second and third years of KISS participation were compared for significant differences. The relative risk was calculated for the first and the third year of KISS participation. Multi-variate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect significant risk factors for SSI after CD using the third year of participation as one parameter. Twenty-six of 52 obstetric and gynaecology departments met the study's inclusion criteria. In those 26 departments, 17,405 CD procedures were performed and 331 SSIs were recorded (1.9%). The SSI rate after CD procedures was significantly reduced in the third year of KISS participation (1.6%) compared with the first year of KISS participation (2.4%), with a relative risk of 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.82]. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that KISS participation over three years was an independent factor for the reduction of SSI rate (odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.49-0.83). As shown previously for other types of HAI, this study demonstrated that continuous surveillance and comparison with stratified reference data could reduce SSI infection rates after CD.
BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are progressively rising in many parts of the world. One suggested reason is increasing requests by women for caesarean section in the absence of clear medical indications, such as placenta praevia, HIV infection, contracted pelvis and, arguably, breech presentation or previous caesarean section. The reported benefits of planned caesarean section include greater safety for the baby, less pelvic floor trauma for the mother, avoidance of labour pain and convenience. The potential disadvantages, from observational studies, include increased risk of major morbidity or mortality for the mother, adverse psychological sequelae, and problems in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine scar rupture and greater risk of stillbirth and neonatal morbidity. An unbiased assessment of advantages and disadvantages would assist discussion of what has become a contentious issue in modern obstetrics. OBJECTIVES: To assess, from randomised trials, the effects on perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, and on maternal psychological morbidity, of planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal birth in women with no clear clinical indication for caesarean section. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (December 2005), MEDLINE (1974 to April 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005), CINAHL (1982 to April 2005) and PsycINFO (1887 to April 2005). We also performed a manual search of the references of all retrieved articles, sought unpublished papers and abstracts submitted to international conferences and contacted expert informants. SELECTION CRITERIA: All comparisons of intention to perform caesarean section and intention for women to give birth vaginally; random allocation to treatment and control groups; adequate allocation concealment; women at term with single fetuses with cephalic presentations and no clear medical indication for caesarean section. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS: There were no included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials, upon which to base any practice recommendations regarding planned caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. In the absence of trial data, there is an urgent need for a systematic review of observational studies and a synthesis of qualitative data to better assess the short- and long-term effects of caesarean section and vaginal birth.
The question of cesarean section by choice (that is, cesarean delivery in the absence of medical indications) has been hotly debated by the obstetrical profession in recent years. The debate has focused around questions of risks and benefits, and has revolved around questions of obstetrical practice. In this paper, the question will be framed in a reproductive rights context. How does the phenomenon of CSBC (cesarean section by choice) impact women's empowerment? Which reproductive rights might be affected by this question, and what policies are related to its use? FIGO's 1998 statement "Ethical Aspects regarding Cesarean Delivery for Non-Medical Reasons" is revisited, and, in light of these considerations, its contents are endorsed once again.