PubMed · 4536223
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S P Weber. 1974. [Implantation registration program].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4536223/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A new X-ray microtomographic technique for non-invasive assessment of the structure of bone surrounding implants was tested. Three titanium microimplants retrieved directly (n = 2) or 6 months (n = 1) after insertion in 3 patients were used as test samples. Two samples were used dry and one was embedded in plastic resin prior to microtomography. The technique provided high-resolution consecutive cross-sectional X-ray images of the specimens with a slice-to-slice distance of 4.4 to 11.0 microns. The pictures could be imported into an image analysing software with which semiautomatic quantitative measurement of the bone area and three-dimensional images of the specimens could be made. It is suggested that the technique may be used for non-invasive assessment of the bone structure around implants. Further studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of the technique, for instance by comparing tomographic sections with histologic ones.
Two implant placement methods are used in oral implantology: submerged (S, two-stage surgical procedure) and non-submerged (NS, one-stage surgery). However, a quantitative assessment of their influence on implant osseointegration, summarising the whole present experience, is not directly possible, owing to the lack of normalisation of the published results. To overcome this difficulty, selection criteria have been applied to the latter in a process of a meta-analysis of specialised literature, in order to authorise a pooled treatment with an adequate statistical method. Survival life tables are established (up to 15 and 10 years respectively for S and NS implants placed in normal situations) for extended samples (13049 S and 5515 NS implants). Early (before loading) failure rates and 95% confidence level ranges of cumulative implant survival rates are shown. For both categories, the quality of the placement stage remains critical to ensure optimal osseointegration behaviour. Both categories match current survival requirements, but with a quite different behaviour over time. NS implants, while osseointegrating better initially, are subject to causes of osseointegration loss, which persist over a longer period of time. Implant design characteristics (including the type of surface) seem to be more relevant than the placement procedure for the implant's behaviour. This is in agreement with recent histological and preliminary clinical results, and should be confirmed by further studies.