Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 4502860

[Ceramics].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H A Kreutzmann. 1972. [Ceramics].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4502860/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Curing efficiency of different polymerization methods through ceramic restorations.

The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the curing efficiency of three different polymerization methods through ceramic restorations by determination of the depth of cure and the universal hardness of a composite resin luting material. Therefore, 36 ceramic specimens [Empress 2 (Ivoclar), color 300, diameter 4 mm, height 2 mm] were prepared and inserted in steel molds (diameter 4 mm, height 6 mm) using a composite resin luting material [Variolink II (Vivadent)] with and without catalyst. The polymerization through six specimens of each group was done conventionally (40 s), by softstart polymerization (40 s), or by plasma arc curing (10 s). Depth of cure under the ceramic specimens was assessed according to ISO 4049. Additionally, universal hardness was determined at 0.5 and 1.0 mm from the ceramic using a universal testing machine (Zwick 14040). Curing without a catalyst, using conventional and softstart polymerization, resulted in greater hardness in both layers, compared to plasma arc curing. The use of a catalyst always produced a greater hardness and depth of cure with all polymerization methods. Depth of cure was always greater using conventional polymerization and softstart polymerization, compared to plasma arc curing. The curing efficiency of plasma arc curing through ceramic was lower compared to conventional and softstart-polymerization.

Dental Porcelain↗

Effect of soldering on metal-porcelain bond strength in repaired porcelain-fused-to-metal castings.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Chemical bonding plays a major role in the adherence between metal and porcelain. The formation of an oxide layer on solder material has not been described in the literature. It is unknown whether the application of solder negatively affects the bond strength between porcelain and metal. PURPOSE: This in vitro study assessed the effect of solder on the bond strength between metal and porcelain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty 20 x 6 x 0.5 mm patterns were divided into test (20) and control (20) groups. Test samples were perforated and repaired with solder, and 2 layers of opaque and dentin porcelain subsequently were applied on all samples. The samples were subjected to a 3-point flexural test on a screw-driven mechanical testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure type (adhesive vs cohesive) was quantified by digitizing photographs of test and control samples. Three samples in each group also were examined with an SEM coupled with an x-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy apparatus (SEM/EDS). Means and standard deviations of loads at failure, sample thickness, and surface area covered with porcelain were calculated, and data were analyzed with Student t test (P < or = 0.05). RESULTS: The mean fracture load for test samples was significantly greater than for control samples (P = 0.0038). Test samples also were significantly thicker (mean thickness difference 0.14 mm) (P = 0.0001). When the data were controlled for thickness by using a multiple linear regression analysis, no significant difference was found (P = 0.68). Test samples had a greater surface area covered with opaque porcelain (P = 0.0006) as determined by visual inspection. CONCLUSION: In this study, soldered and nonsoldered samples did not show any significant difference in porcelain-to-metal bond strength. Visual analysis revealed a significant difference in the amount of porcelain remaining on the fracture surface of the test and control samples; a complete quantitative elemental analysis with SEM/EDS is in progress.

Dental Porcelain↗

Prosthodontics: achieving quality esthetic dentistry and integrated comprehensive care.

BACKGROUND: Prosthodontics is the dental specialty responsible for diagnosis, rehabilitation and maintenance of patients with complex clinical conditions involving missing or deficient teeth and/or craniofacial tissues. The essence of the specialty is expert treatment planning. OVERVIEW/LITERATURE REVIEWED: In recent years, new approaches and technology have been introduced as a result of research performed in universities and by industry. The field of prosthodontics continues to evolve owing to a better understanding of the biology of the oral cavity and the introduction of new techniques and improved biomaterials. Improvements in periodontal and oral surgical techniques, implant procedures and materials, esthetic restorative materials, and jaw tracking recorders and articulators have led to enhanced functional and esthetic oral and maxillofacial prostheses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The complexities of today's technical and clinical procedures and the higher expectations for more esthetically pleasing dentistry by the general patient population have placed a premium on teamwork involving general dentists, specialists and dental technicians.

Dental Porcelain↗