Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 43530

Geochemistry and ecology.

P J Peterson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of geochemistry as a determining factor in the evolutionary development of plant assemblages. Three contrasting examples of geochemical systems are described and considered in relation to their effects on plant growth and development. Soils derived from serpentines may contain elevated and sometimes toxic concentrations of Cr and Ni depending on mineral composition and weathering processes. These conditions have so modified plant growth during the past few million years that specialized floras have evolved on particular sites. Extensive areas throughout the world contain high concentrations of Se but these have not always been accompanied by the development of specific floras. Geochemistry can help explain how Se-specific floras have developed in several Western States of America but are absent on Se-rich sites in the Republic of Ireland. Pronounced effects of As toxicity in plants have been recognized in recent years especially from areas polluted by smelter waste and fallout. As-tolerant genotypes have developed during the past 100 years and may still be evolving at the present time.

Explore related subjects

ArsenicChromiumEcologyNickelPlant DevelopmentPlantsSeleniumSoilTrace ElementsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Peterson. 1979-12-11. Geochemistry and ecology.. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1979.0098

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Deficient arsenic methylation and global proteomic reprogramming in human keratinocytes during arsenic-induced skin carcinogenesis.

Chronic inorganic arsenic (iAs) exposure affects > 220 million people worldwide and skin cancer is a hallmark of long-term iAs exposure. Limited information exists regarding arsenic methylation by human keratinocytes and how methylation influences skin carcinogenesis. Inorganic arsenite (iAsIII) and its methylated metabolites disrupt diverse zinc finger proteins, leading to differential toxicity patterns. We examined arsenic methylation capacity in non-malignant human keratinocytes and interrogated proteomic remodeling across three stages of iAsIII induced malignant transformation using the well-established preclinical HaCaT model. Arsenic methylation was assessed by hydride generation cryotrapping inductively coupled-mass spectrometry and global proteomic changes were analyzed by tandem-mass tagging liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Primary, hTERT-immortalized and HaCaT human keratinocytes exhibited negligible arsenic methylation, with iAsIII comprising at least 98.5% of total intracellular arsenic, attributable to minimal expression of arsenite methyltransferase. Proteomic profiling identified over 275 differentially expressed proteins at each stage of transformation, including multiple zinc finger proteins implicated in cell cycle control, RNA metabolism, and genome stability. Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis revealed progressive, coordinated disruption of cancer-associated pathways and regulatory networks over the transformation timeline, including zinc-coordinating upstream regulators that may explain widespread pathway dysregulation. Collectively, our findings suggest that iAsIII promotes skin carcinogenesis by disrupting C3H1- and C4-type zinc finger protein-centered regulatory networks that coordinate cancer-associated signaling and metabolic pathways in human keratinocytes, highlighting key candidates for future mechanistic studies.

Arsenic↗
PubMed2007

Hydrogeochemical characteristics of the Tinto and Odiel Rivers (SW Spain). Factors controlling metal contents.

The Tinto and Odiel Rivers are strongly affected by acid mine drainage (AMD) due to the intense sulphide mining developed in their basins over the past 5000 years. In this study the results obtained from a weekly sampling in both rivers, before their mouth in the Ría of Huelva, over three and a half years of control are analysed. In the Tinto River, the concentrations of sulphates, Al, Cd, Co, Li and Zn are double to those of the Odiel as a consequence of lower dilution. However, the concentration of Fe in the Odiel River is 20 times lower, since the precipitation of Fe oxyhydroxysulphates caused by neutralisation processes is more intense. Lower As, Cr, Cu and Pb concentrations are also found in the Odiel River as, to a greater or lesser extent, they are sorbed and/or coprecipitated with Fe. Other elements such as Be, Mn, Ni and Mg show similar values in both systems, which is ascribed to lithological factors. The seasonal evolution of contaminants is typical of rivers affected by AMD, reaching a maximum in autumn due to the dissolution of evaporitic salts precipitated during the summer. Nevertheless, in the Tinto River, Ca, Na and Sr show a strong increase during the summer, probably due to a greater water interaction with marly materials, through which the last reach of the river flows. Barium has a different behaviour from the rest of the metals and its concentration seems to be controlled by the solubility of barite. Iron, As and Pb show different behaviours in both rivers, those for Fe and As possibly linked to the prevalence of different dissolved species of Fe. The different Pb pattern is probably due to the control of Pb solubility by anglesite or other minerals rich in Pb in the Tinto River.

Arsenic↗