Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42749887

Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

There is no clinically relevant blood-based assay for the detection of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a solid malignancy characterized by poor outcomes. Here we developed, validated and tested a blood-based microRNA (miRNA) assay (which included hsa-miR-142-3p, hsa-miR-30c-5p, hsa-miR-335-5p, hsa-miR-340-5p, hsa-miR-200b-3p, hsa-miR-1260b, hsa-miR-145-3p, hsa-miR-145-5p, hsa-miR-429 and hsa-miR-200a-3p) and a composite score, PANXEON (PANcreatic cancer eXosome Early detectiON), that integrates the miRNA signature with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for the detection of early-stage PDAC. We conducted an international, multicenter, observational, prospective biomarker study that involved 1,785 individuals with and without PDAC from four countries. The miRNA signature achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 88.6% in the testing cohort, with a sensitivity of 83.8% for early-stage PDAC, while showing minimal cross-reactivity with other gastrointestinal cancers. In a cohort of 19 individuals, the miRNA signature levels decreased during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and after surgery and increased before disease recurrence. When combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, this blood assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.8% for stage I-II PDAC, false-positive rates of 3.2% in low-risk controls and 15.6% in high-risk controls in the testing cohort. PANXEON demonstrates potential for detecting high-grade dysplasia in individuals with high-risk pancreatic cysts (64.3%). Collectively, we present a composite biomarker that may complement existing strategies for the detection of early-stage PDAC and warrants further large-scale prospective studies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06388967 .

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Caiming Xu, Alessandro Mannucci, Haiyong Han, Ruben M Munoz, Derek Cridebring, Sourat Darabi, Yuji Toiyama, Yoshinaga Okugawa, Gagandeep Singh, Mustafa Raoof, Joon Oh Park, James Lin, Gregory Idos, Michael J Demeure, Erkut Borazanci, Douglas B Evans, Susan Tsai, Eunsung Jun, Carlos Becerra, Scott A Celinski, Laleh Melstrom, Vincent Chung, Guixin Zhang, Dong Shang, David L Bartlett, Mitsuro Kanda, Song Cheol Kim, Valsamo Anagnastou, Giulia Martina Cavestro, John S Bolton, Ali H Zaidi, Daniel Von Hoff, Ajay Goel. 2026-09-16. Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04625-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article