Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42749759

JNK acts as a molecular brake of the CDC73 positive feedback loop to modulate osteosarcoma malignant progression via UBR5.

Abstract

CDC73 is a well-characterized tumor suppressor regulated by stress stimuli, governing progression of diverse human malignancies. Although previous studies have shown that E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR5 drives CDC73 ubiquitination and degradation to modulate tumorigenesis, the mechanisms by which stress-responsive pathways regulate UBR5-mediated CDC73 inactivation and transcriptional reprogramming remain elusive. Here, via integrated analyses of public datasets, multi-omics profiling (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing [ATAC-seq], cleavage under targets and tagmentation [CUT&Tag], mRNA sequencing [mRNA-seq]), in vitro/in vivo assays, and molecular approaches including co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and molecular docking, we demonstrate that UBR5 depletion profoundly alters chromatin accessibility and genome-wide transcriptional profiles in a CDC73-dependent manner. UBR5 ablation markedly suppresses osteosarcoma malignant phenotypes in cultured cells and xenograft models, with these effects fully rescued by concurrent CDC73 silencing. Mechanistically, we identify the JNK cascade as the critical upstream regulator: JNK activation sustains CDC73 stability by antagonizing UBR5-mediated CDC73 polyubiquitination, and map Lys257 as the key residue for UBR5-dependent CDC73 ubiquitination and degradation. Collectively, our findings define a novel JNK-dependent UBR5-CDC73 axis that acts as a molecular brake of the CDC73 positive feedback loop to orchestrate transcriptional programs, providing new mechanistic insights into CDC73 post-translational regulation in tumorigenesis and promising therapeutic targets for CDC73-dysregulated diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dingji Li, Xinchen Wang, Huigen Luo, Hua Tu, Lili Hao, IoHong Lei, Renjie Hu, Pengchao Zheng, Yuhan Shi, Jianbo Sun, Minying Zhu, Chengnong Guan, Baoshan Xu. 2026-09-16. JNK acts as a molecular brake of the CDC73 positive feedback loop to modulate osteosarcoma malignant progression via UBR5.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-026-03978-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article