Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42736496

The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wenxue Wan·Lu Shen·Yawei Chang·Xueqin Jin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative rehabilitation training can optimize functional reserve before radical prostatectomy (RP), thereby improving postoperative outcomes. However, its effects on urinary incontinence, erectile function, and quality of life (QoL) remain controversial. This study systematically evaluated these outcome measures. METHODS: Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL databases. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata 18.0 software. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Outcomes included urinary incontinence incidence, urinary incontinence severity, erectile function, and QoL at different postoperative follow-up time points. RESULTS: 16 randomized controlled trials involving 1,542 participants were included. Prehabilitation significantly reduced the incidence of urinary incontinence at 1 month (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.84) and 6 months (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96) after RP, with a non-significant borderline reduction at 3 months, and no significant benefit at 12 months. No significant improvement was observed in urinary incontinence severity or erectile function at any follow-up time point. Prehabilitation significantly improved QoL within 3 months (SMD = -0.70, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.32) and 6 months (SMD = -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.16) postoperatively. However, within 12 months, the effect size attenuated, showing only a marginal trend that did not reach statistical significance (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.00). Risk of bias was generally moderate. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation reduces early incontinence and improves QoL post-RP, but its effects on severity and erectile function remain unclear. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO [CRD420251183407].

Explore related subjects

HumansMaleProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary IncontinenceQuality of LifeErectile DysfunctionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative ExerciseMeta-analysisPrehabilitationProstate cancerQuality of lifeRadical prostatectomyUrinary incontinenceJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wenxue Wan, Lu Shen, Yawei Chang, Xueqin Jin. 2026-09-14. The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11182-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Humans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Review resourceMale subjectMeta-Analysis subjectPostoperative Complications subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Could the preoperative urethral curve be used to predict immediate urinary continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? A retrospective multi-center study.

PURPOSE: Immediate urinary continence (UC) recovery following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) remains highly variable, highlighting the need for reliable preoperative prediction. We aimed to develop and validate models to identify patients likely to achieve immediate UC recovery following RS-RARP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 580 prostate cancer patients who underwent RS-RARP from four medical centers were assigned to a training set (n=348), an internal validation set (n=103) and an external validation set (n=129). Independent predictors were identified through univariate analysis and LASSO regression. A nomogram was constructed using multivariate logistic regression. Its performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Immediate UC recovery was observed in 84.5% (294/348) of patients in the training cohort, 80.6% (83/103) in the internal validation cohort, and 81.4% (105/129) in the external validation cohort, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified membranous urethral length (MUL) (OR=1.23, P=0.029) and urethral curvature (OR=2.84, P<0.001) as independent predictors, while prostate volume (PV) (OR=0.84, P <0.001) as a protective factor. The nomogram integrating MUL, PV, and urethral curvature demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.91) in the training cohort. The bootstrap-corrected calibration slope was 0.96, and the Brier score was 0.08.&#xa0;Calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the predictive accuracy and clinical utility of the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: Our study introduces a novel quantitative method for assessing urethral curvature. The mpMRI-based model, integrating urethral curvature and prostate spatial configuration, offers enhanced predictive accuracy for postoperative immediate UC recovery.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of demographic characteristics on the outcome of prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy: Analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of advanced molecular imaging, race, socioeconomic status, and metabolic dysregulation on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy (sRT) for prostate cancer recurrence in a clinical trial setting. METHODS: The authors randomized post-prostatectomy men with detectable prostate-specific antigen to sRT guided by conventional imaging (arm A) or 18F-fluciclovine-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (arm B) and followed them up for up to 48 months to determine failure-free survival (FFS). The authors computed socioeconomic status (SES) and allostatic load (AL) scores to quantify socioeconomic status and level of metabolic dysregulation. They stratified patients by race as African American men (AAM) versus men of other races (MOR) and compared FFS between them using the z-test. RESULTS: Eighty-one (AAM&#xa0;=&#xa0;29, MOR&#xa0;=&#xa0;52) and 76 (AAM&#xa0;=&#xa0;26, MOR&#xa0;=&#xa0;50) men completed per-protocol sRT in arms A and B, respectively. Across study arms, AAM showed a higher FFS rate than MOR (72.8% [95% CI, 53.8%-85.0%] vs. 58.7% [95% CI, 46.6%-68.9%]; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;.002). In arm A, FFS rate was better for AAM than MOR, (64.0% [95% CI, 34.4%-82.9%] vs. 45.3% [95% CI, 28.8%-60.4%]; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;.008). In arm B, FFS improved for both groups but less so for AAM, (81.5% [95% CI, 57.2%-92.7%] vs. 73.0% [95% CI, 56.3%-84.1%]; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;.131). The authors found lower SES scores and higher AL scores for AAM in both study arms than MOR. CONCLUSION: Despite lower socioeconomic status and higher burden of metabolic dysregulation, in a clinical trial setting that controls for disparities in health care access, AAM have a more favorable sRT outcome than MOR.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus conventional holmium:YAG laser in anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Anatomical endoscopic enucleation is an established treatment for benign prostatic obstruction. Whether thulium fiber laser enucleation (ThuFLEP) improves outcomes over conventional holmium:YAG laser enucleation (HoLEP) remains uncertain. We compared the efficacy and safety of ThuFLEP versus non-MOSES-modulated HoLEP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of randomised and comparative cohort studies comparing ThuFLEP and conventional HoLEP in adult men. Six databases were searched. Outcomes included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality-of-life score, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume, hospital stay, and complications. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed with RoB 2/ROBINS-I and GRADE. RESULTS: Seven non-overlapping comparative populations in eight publications included 3,509 patients. ThuFLEP was associated with a small statistically significant reduction in IPSS at 3&#xa0;months (mean difference [MD] -1.04 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.81 to -0.28) of uncertain clinical relevance. Qmax differences were small and directionally inconsistent across follow-up (favouring HoLEP at 3&#xa0;months and ThuFLEP at 6 and 12&#xa0;months) and derived mainly from retrospective cohorts, with neutral randomised subgroups. Stress and urge urinary incontinence were less frequent overall (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96, and RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.68), but both estimates depended on one large registry cohort and were not robust to its exclusion. Most other complications and hospital stay showed no clear between-group difference. Limitations include few studies per outcome, heterogeneity, sparse safety events, inconsistent prostate-specific antigen reporting, and mostly low/very low certainty evidence. CONCLUSION: ThuFLEP and conventional HoLEP are clinically comparable with no definitive superiority of either laser. Platform selection should be individualised according to surgeon expertise, institutional resources, and patient characteristics. Future trials should standardise cost-effectiveness outcomes and investigate whether the distinct laser-tissue interactions impact adenoma clearance, PSA reduction, enucleation completeness, and long-term durability.

Humans↗