Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42732362

Clonotypic characterization defines B-cell drivers of clonal expansion and intratumor heterogeneity in IgM monoclonal gammopathies.

Abstract

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) share the same cell of origin but differ in clonal size. Compared with other B-cell neoplasms, the lymphoplasmacytic clone in WM can be rather small, limiting our understanding of clonal expansion. We applied an integrative approach using single-cell RNA with B-cell receptor (BCR) sequencing, the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin, and whole-genome sequencing to characterize the tumor clone in patients with IgM MGUS, smoldering WM (SWM), and symptomatic WM (WM). IgM MGUS and low- or intermediate-risk SWM harbored multiple B-cell clones compared to WM. CD9, JCHAIN, RASSF6, and DUSP22 were the main markers of the dominant B-cell clone at gene expression and chromatin activity levels, with CD9 preferentially expressed in plasma cell-like tumor cells. POU2F2 had high activity in the tumor clone and was linked to CD9 regulatory regions. MYD88 and IGLL5 mutations, mainly associated with the mutational signature SBS5, were present in minor clones, whereas the MYD88 mutation was also detected in nonexpanded B-cells. The 6q deletion was present in tumor cells from high-risk patients, which harbored fitness advantage over copy-neutral tumor cells. Coding mutations clustered tumor and minor clones from oligoclonal patients and were associated with abnormal transcriptional programs. The B-cell clones also showed enriched predicted interactions with monocytes. Our integrative single-cell approach reveals the importance of clone size in IgM gammopathy and identifies key markers promoting clonal expansion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David F Moreno, Ferran Nadeu, Marta Casado-Peláez, Caterina Mata, Ian Márquez-López, Marco A Fernández, Sergi Vaqué, Elena Medina, Helena Llobregat, Marta Garrote, Joan Mañé, Oriol Cardús, Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato, Anna de Daniel, María Teresa Cibeira, Theo Gremen Oliveira, Elizaveta Kulaeva, Ester Lozano, Dolors Colomer, Laura Rosiñol, Ruben van Boxtel, Manel Esteller, Carlos Fernández de Larrea. 2026-09-12. Clonotypic characterization defines B-cell drivers of clonal expansion and intratumor heterogeneity in IgM monoclonal gammopathies.. https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70456

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article