Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42727578

CanVar-UK: A collaborative platform for germline interpretation in cancer susceptibility genes.

Abstract

Germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) are typically inherited rather than arising de novo. Hence, wide cascade testing of families across geographies is common, meaning consistency in variant classification is particularly critical. Variant interpretation requires collation of variant-level data from diverse sources, as well as assembly of comprehensive clinical data, often necessitating sharing of information between genomic testing centers. Here, we describe CanVar-UK, a freely accessible web platform bespoke designed to support interpretation of germline CSG variants. CanVar-UK contains variant-level data for over 1.1 million single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), comprising all possible coding SNVs in 116 established CSGs. The data sources with which variants are annotated include in silico scores from 11 clinically relevant tools, population allele frequencies from gnomAD v4.1, case counts from multiple cohorts, including National Health Service (NHS) clinical laboratory testing, variant-level readouts from 47 selected functional and splicing datasets across 19 CSGs, genetic epidemiology studies, and live linkage to existing consensus classifications in the ClinVar database. The diagnostic discussion forum is only available to registered diagnostic scientist users. Through this, a variant-tagged email message can be dispatched in real time across the diagnostic forum community of >1,500 users, with all exchanges and classifications captured and stored in the platform. Already widely used by NHS diagnostic clinical scientists in the UK, CanVar-UK has a rapidly growing international diagnostic user base (>800 UK and >600 non-UK registered users). Survey of the NHS diagnostic user community illustrates the wide-ranging utility of CanVar-UK within their clinical workflows for interpretation of germline CSG variants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Charlie F Rowlands, Subin Choi, Sophie Allen, Zeid Kuzbari, Cankut Çubuk, Razvan Sultana, Beth Torr, Miranda Durkie, George J Burghel, Rachel Robinson, Alison Callaway, Joanne Field, Bethan Frugtniet, Sheila Palmer-Smith, Jonathan Grant, Judith Pagan, Elizabeth Johnston, Trudi McDevitt, Lowri Hughes, Laura Yarram-Smith, Peter Logan, Laura Reed, Katie Snape, Terri McVeigh, Helen Hanson, Alice Garrett, Clare Turnbull, CanVIG-UK. 2026-09-11. CanVar-UK: A collaborative platform for germline interpretation in cancer susceptibility genes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2026.08.006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article