Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42723291

Self-reported physical activity in a randomized study from Norwegian Healthy Life Centres.

Martin Svege Iglebæk·Jardar Espeland·Eivind Meland·Thomas Mildestvedt
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AIM: This study examines firstly if participation in a three-month intervention at Norwegian Healthy Life Centres (HLCs) improved self-reported physical activity (SR-PA), and secondly to what extent physical activity (PA) status at six months and changes from baseline were associated with demographic and motivational predictors. BACKGROUND: Regular PA is promoted as a central component of public health initiatives aimed at preventing noncommunicable diseases. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 118 participants (57 in the intervention group) recruited from HLCs in South-western Norway. The intervention effect was assessed by comparing the intervention group with the waiting-list control group after six months. We examined sociodemographic and motivational predictors of change combining both groups into a single cohort. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02247219). FINDINGS: At six-month follow-up, participants in the intervention group reported higher levels of SR-PA compared with the control group. The estimated effect was modest (B = 0.26, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.53), equivalent to ≈0.37 SD. Although the confidence interval included zero, the estimate remained compatible with a modest positive effect. Autonomous motivation and social support were positively associated with SR-PA after 6 months, while psychological defiance showed a negative association. Autonomous motivation and psychological defiance impacted PA change during the 6-month period in opposite directions.

Explore related subjects

HumansNorwayFemaleSelf ReportExerciseMotivationMaleMiddle AgedHealth PromotionAdultSocial Supportbehaviour change interventionmotivational predictorsprimary health careself-reported physical activityJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Martin Svege Iglebæk, Jardar Espeland, Eivind Meland, Thomas Mildestvedt. 2026-09-11. Self-reported physical activity in a randomized study from Norwegian Healthy Life Centres.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423626101686

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resourceAdult subjectExercise subjectFemale subjectHealth Promotion subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectMotivation subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Randomised, Multicentre Clinical Trial Found That Hypertonic Saline Did Not Reduce the Length of Stay of Hospitalised Patients With Acute Bronchiolitis.

AIM: Bronchiolitis is a major cause of hospitalisation in young children, but the effectiveness of inhaled hypertonic saline remains unclear. We compared treating hospitalised infants with nebulised hypertonic saline or normal saline. METHOD: This multisite, double-blind RCT was conducted from 1 October 2023 to 1 April 2025 in four Polish paediatric units. Children from 5 weeks to 24 months, who had been hospitalised with mild-to-moderate bronchiolitis, were randomly assigned to receive nebulised 3% hypertonic saline or 0.9% normal saline until discharge. They were followed for 7 days. RESULTS: The study comprised 181 children (55% male) with a mean age of 8.3 ± 6.3 months: 90 were randomised to hypertonic saline and 91 to normal saline. The median hospital stay was 2.68 (1.92-4.03) days in the hypertonic saline group and 2.79 (1.8-3.96) days in the normal saline group. The mean difference was -0.11 days (95% confidence interval -0.73 to 0.12, p = 0.3). No differences were observed in clinical severity scores between the groups. Readmissions only occurred in the normal saline group (5.9%). CONCLUSION: Hypertonic saline inhalation did not reduce the length of hospital stay or improve clinical severity scores in hospitalised children with bronchiolitis, but it was associated with a lower risk of rehospitalisation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Prevalence of Breastfeeding in Infants With Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

AIM: To estimate the prevalence of breastfeeding-overall, exclusive, partial and depending on infants' age-in infants with Down syndrome, and to investigate associated factors. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and SciELO up to 1 August 2024. Original articles that estimated the prevalence of breastfeeding in infants with Down syndrome, written in French, English or Spanish, were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. Meta-analyses were performed for breastfeeding outcomes and meta-regression explored heterogeneity. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021278019). RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (3463 infants) were included. The estimated prevalence of overall breastfeeding regardless of duration was 71.6% (95% CI [60.3; 80.7]; 25 studies, 3351 infants) with high heterogeneity, I2 = 94%. The estimated prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 38.4% (95% CI [22.4; 57.3]; 10 studies, 1099 infants). No factor assessed in meta-regression was significantly associated with overall breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: The estimated breastfeeding prevalence in infants with Down syndrome is similar to that reported in the general population, despite high heterogeneity. Further studies using standardised methodology to assess breastfeeding barriers and facilitators in the context of Down syndrome would allow us to improve support for breastfeeding.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Patient expectations assessed before randomisation and after the first treatment session, and their associations with pain outcome at 3 months in patients with tennis elbow: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled feasibility trial in Norwegian secondary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' expectations of pain improvement before randomisation (T1) and after the first treatment (T2), and to examine how expectations at these two time points were associated with pain outcome measured at 3&#x2009;months (T3). DESIGN: Exploratory secondary analyses of a three-arm, randomised controlled feasibility trial in patients with tennis elbow comparing heavy slow resistance training, shock wave therapy and advice (1:1:1). SETTING: Outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with lateral epicondylalgia, commonly known as tennis elbow. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Expected pain was rated on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at T1 and T2. Present pain (NRS, 0-10) was reported at 3&#x2009;months (T3). Changes in expectations from T1 to T2 were summarised descriptively. Univariable linear regressions assessed associations between T3 pain and expectations at T1 and T2, treatment group and baseline factors. Explained variance was quantified by R2. Multivariable models including demographics and baseline pain were evaluated via adjusted R2. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were included. In the shock wave group, nine (47%) came to expect greater improvement from T1 to T2; by contrast, in the advice group, seven (41%) expected less improvement. Expectations at T1 were not associated with T3 pain, whereas expectations at T2 were positively associated with T3 pain (b=0.61, 95%&#x2009;CI 0.33 to 0.89, p<0.01, R2=0.27), suggesting that higher expected pain at T2 was associated with higher reported pain at T3. Adding education and baseline pain increased explained variance modestly (R2 from 0.27 to 0.32). CONCLUSION: In this study, expectations measured after randomisation and one treatment session were associated with pain at 3&#x2009;months for patients with tennis elbow. Larger, prospectively designed studies should investigate how postrandomisation expectations relate to clinical outcomes in non-blinded musculoskeletal trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04803825.

Humans↗