Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42717097

Integrated signatures define mutational processes in prostate cancer.

Abstract

Prostate cancer follows a long and heterogeneous disease course with incompletely understood aetiology1. Here we dissect the mutational processes shaping the genomes of 959 donors from the Pan Prostate Cancer Group and assess their clinical relevance. By integrating de novo extracted single-base substitution, insertion-deletion and copy-number signatures with six novel complex structural variant signatures, we identify eight integrated mutational footprints (IMFs) that collectively explain the mutational processes in 85% of primary prostate cancer genomes. IMFs were strongly influenced by regional biases in the genome, most prevalently androgen receptor-mediated mutagenesis and replication stress. Four IMFs, present in 37% of primary tumours, were significantly associated with shorter time to metastasis. These included reactive oxygen-species-driven mutagenesis and both canonical and non-canonical homologous recombination deficiency, the latter being enriched in patients of African ancestry. Extending to the metastatic setting, we found that IMFs predicted sensitivity to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. Taken together, our study delineates the aetiologies and mutational processes that drive the genomic and clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer, introduces IMFs as a unifying framework, and highlights their potential to improve both risk stratification and biomarker-guided treatment selection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andreas J Gruber, André V Olsen, Barbara Hernando, Kevin C L Cheng, Clarissa Gerhäuser, Marina Torres, Francesco Favero, Daria Kiriy, Ángel Fernández-Sanromán, Juan Maria Roldan-Romero, Lucy Barton, Diogo Pellegrina, G Steven Bova, Daniel S Brewer, Mark N Brook, Benedikt Brors, Adam Butler, Géraldine Cancel-Tassin, Niall M Corcoran, Olivier Cussenot, Abraham Gihawi, Etsehiwot G Girma, Vincent J Gnanapragasam, Anis A Hamid, Vanessa M Hayes, Housheng Hansen He, Christopher M Hovens, Eddie L Imada, G Maria Jakobsdottir, Chol-Hee Jung, Francesca Khani, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Philippe Lamy, Gregory Leeman, Massimo Loda, Pavlo Lutsik, Luigi Marchionni, Ramyar Molania, Anthony T Papenfuss, Bernard Pope, Lucio R Queiroz, Tobias Rausch, Brian Robinson, Atef Sahli, Karina D Sørensen, Takafumi N Yamaguchi, Sebastian Uhrig, Yaobo Xu, Claudio Zanettini, Pan Prostate Cancer Group (PPCG), Ronald Simon, Guido Sauter, Ros A Eeles, Colin S Cooper, Robert G Bristow, David C Wedge, Thorsten Schlomm, Geoff Macintyre, Jüri Reimand, Joachim Weischenfeldt. 2026-09-09. Integrated signatures define mutational processes in prostate cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10468-w

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article