Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42714839

Phase 1 trial and biomarker analysis of Buparlisib with weekly Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in high risk locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the Head and Neck.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib with weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced (LA) squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) and tobacco history. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV LA-SCCHN (AJCC7), ≥10 pack-year tobacco use treated with curative intent were enrolled. Patients received buparlisib during a 2-week run-in phase and during standard 70Gy of radiotherapy plus weekly cisplatin. An exploratory analysis of genomic sequencing was performed on biopsy specimens Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled (n=17 at the MTD (buparlisib 40 mg daily, CDDP 30mg/m2/week)). Ninety-one percent (21/23) had stage IV disease. HPV was detected in 15 of 18 cases with oral/oropharyngeal disease. 5 patients suffered recurrences of whom 3 had activating mutations along the PI3K pathway. In 5 patients whose disease responded during the 2 week run-in phase with buparlisib alone, 3 of 4 with sequencing data showed loss-of-function mutations in either Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Associated Factor 3 (TRAF3), and/or Cylindromatosis Lysine Deubiquinatinase (CYLD). Preclinical studies with mutations in TRAF3 or CYLD via CRISPR/Cas9 knockout in HPV+SCCHN cells demonstrate that loss of TRAF3 or CYLD may sensitize SCCHN cell lines to PI3K through mechanisms other than blocking NFκb pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Buparlisib with CRT was feasible and active, though escalation to the standard weekly cisplatin dose of 40 mg/m2 was not possible. Our data suggests that TRAF3/CYLD mutant SCCHN may be susceptible to PI3K inhibition whereas PI3K pathway activation appeared to be associated with poor outcomes in this limited dataset.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jochen H Lorch, Kristine Wong, Roy B Tishler, Robert I Haddad, Anne O'Neill, Kee-Young Shin, Mofei Liu, Glenn J Hanna, Nicole G Chau, Guilherme Rabinowits, Jonathan D Schoenfeld, Danielle N Margalit, Laura Goguen, Ravindra Uppaluri, Tom Thomas, Alec Kacew, Patricia McHugh, Ethan Harris, Kimberly Austin, Julian Huang, Umair Mahmood, Bose S Kochupurakkal, Lynette M Sholl, Jennifer M Spangle. 2026-09-09. Phase 1 trial and biomarker analysis of Buparlisib with weekly Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in high risk locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the Head and Neck.. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3677

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article