Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42709343

Safety profiles of CAR-T cell therapy in systematic autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and analysis.

Yan Xie·Yang Liu·Xiaoyuan Chen·Qibing Xie
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs)-T cell therapy is emerging as a potent approach for autoimmune diseases. However, its application in autoimmune conditions remains limited, and safety outcomes observed in malignancies can't reliably serve as a reference. Therefore, it's necessary to summarize the safety profiles in autoimmune diseases to provide evidence for future expanding trials. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to analyze the CAR-T therapy safety in rheumatic diseases via database searches up to December 2025. Studies reporting safety data were included, while abstracts, reviews, and cases with malignancies were excluded. Factors associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were analyzed using Firth's penalized logistic regression. RESULTS: This study included 38 studies, involving a total of 115 patients with autoimmune disease. Severe adverse events were rare. CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 70.4% and 4.3% of patients, respectively. Most CRS were low-grade. Multivariate analysis identified BCMA-targeted therapy and allogeneic CAR-T products may as independent factors associated with a reduced risk of CRS. Transient hematologic toxicity and hypogammaglobulinemia were frequently reported, with infections occurring in nearly half of the patients. However, prolonged cytopenia and severe infection were infrequent. CONCLUSION: Based on the current available evidence, CAR-T therapy appears to have a generally manageable safety profile in autoimmune diseases, supporting its potential as a promising treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory autoimmune diseases. However, these findings remain preliminary, and further expanded studies are warranted in the future to provide higher-level evidence.

Explore related subjects

HumansAutoimmune DiseasesImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCytokine Release SyndromeTreatment OutcomeAutoimmune diseasesCAR-T therapySafety profilesSystematic reviewJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yan Xie, Yang Liu, Xiaoyuan Chen, Qibing Xie. 2026-09-08. Safety profiles of CAR-T cell therapy in systematic autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-026-09828-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Autoimmune Diseases subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Review resourceSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The future of TCR-Treg therapies is renewables.

Cell therapy has longstanding roots in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and early immune cell transfers in infectious disease and transplantation, where patient- or donor-derived cells have achieved therapeutic benefit in selected contexts. The modern era has been driven largely by oncology, with engineered modalities such as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, CAR-T cells and TCR-engineered T cells delivering transformative responses but requiring complex, costly manufacturing. These platforms are now being adapted for autoimmune diseases to induce durable, antigen-specific immune tolerance, yet broad application is limited by safety concerns, process complexity and access. Non-engineered cell therapies for autoimmunity, including mesenchymal stem cells, polyclonal regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells, have shown acceptable safety and proof-of-principle for immune re-education, but clinical responses have been modest and inconsistent, with limited scalability. Engineered approaches such as CAR-T cells can induce reversible B cell depletion in B cell-mediated rheumatic diseases but only addresses antibody-driven pathology and not T cell-mediated autoimmunity. TCR-engineered Tregs have emerged as a promising antigen-specific strategy, offering localized, antigen-linked suppression with bystander tolerance. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest superior potency, stability and disease control compared with polyclonal Tregs at similar or lower doses, but translation is constrained by the rarity and fragility of Tregs and by labour-intensive, CAR-T-like manufacturing. This review highlights emerging solutions for closed, automated and decentralised production, and discusses allogeneic approaches using gene-edited or banked Tregs with HLA engineering or matching. Together, these advances support the development of scalable, "off-the-shelf" TCR-Treg products with potential to provide safe, affordable tolerance-restoring therapies for autoimmune disease.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Biomimetic mesoporous silica nanosphere ameliorate experimental autoimmune uveitis by delivering sCD83.

Autoimmune uveitis (AU) is an autoimmune disease that may lead to blindness, but there are currently no precise targeted therapies for its prevention and treatment. Dendritic cell (DC) is key cell involved in the pathogenesis of AU, and specific regulation of their state can help improve AU. In this work, mesoporous silica nanospheres were loaded with the immunomodulator soluble CD83 (sCD83) and subsequently camouflaged with dendritic cell (DC) membranes to fabricate the nanocarrier DCM@MSN/sCD83 for treating experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). Research results show that DCM@MSN/sCD83 effectively alleviated the symptoms of uveitis in EAU, reduced the proportion of CD4+CD25-T cell/CD4+CD25+T cell and the percentage of DC in the eyes and cervical lymph nodes. It also decreased the expression of STING in Müller cell. Furthermore, the efficacy of DCM@MSN/sCD83 was found to be primarily targeting DC, and promoted the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β1 in DC by activating the phosphorylated HIF/STAT3 pathway, to induce the production of CD4+CD25+ T. This effect is superior to nanomedicine loaded with dexamethasone. Moreover，DCM enabled the nanocarriers to efficiently cross the blood-eye barrier and reach cervical lymph nodes, thereby regulating peripheral immunity. This research indicate that cell membrane-modified nanoparticles targeting homologous cells can effectively improve treatment efficiency and duration, which is potential therapy strategy for uveitis.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus infection/reactivation following CAR-T cell therapy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection or reactivation is an emerging but underrecognized complication following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and is likely associated with treatment-induced immune dysregulation. Data regarding its clinical impact remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reported occurrence, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of EBV infection or reactivation in adults undergoing CAR-T therapy. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to March 2025 for studies reporting EBV infection or reactivation after CAR-T therapy in adults. Due to limited and heterogeneous data, results were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: Five studies comprising 80 patients were included (median age, 55 years; 52.6% male among patients with reported sex data [10/19]). Across the included studies, 11 EBV infection/reactivation events were identified among 80 described CAR-T recipients, representing 13.8% of the reported sample rather than a true incidence estimate. Among events with usable individualized timing data, the median interval from CAR-T infusion to EBV detection/reactivation was 9.8 months (approximate range, 1-44 months). Because EBV surveillance strategies and definitions were inconsistently reported across studies, this proportion should not be interpreted as a true incidence estimate. Four patients (36.4%) developed EBV-associated disease, including three cases of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorder and one case of EBV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Among seven patients with reported post-CAR-T treatment response, four achieved Complete Remission/ Continuous Complete Remission; treatment response should be interpreted separately from final survival status. Confirmed EBV-related mortality occurred in 2/11 patients with reported EBV infection/reactivation and in 2/4 patients with EBV-associated disease; all-cause mortality could not be reliably estimated because patient-level vital status could not be fully attributed to the EBV-reactivated subgroup. Reported toxicities predominantly consisted of low-grade cytokine-release syndrome; however, toxicity data were limited. CONCLUSION: Although infrequently reported, EBV infection or reactivation after CAR-T therapy may be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among affected patients. However, the available evidence is limited by the small sample size, heterogeneous study designs, and inconsistent EBV surveillance practices.

Humans↗