Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42708797

PGR expression as a pharmacogenomic companion biomarker to GENE70-derived genomic risk in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Orcun Can
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biology of the estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancers is heterogeneous even when they are categorized by their risk via genomics. Transcriptomic PGR expression reflects endocrine pathway activity and may provide complementary biological information within established GENE70-derived genomic-risk categories. Whether this molecular marker improves the biological interpretation of genomic-risk stratification beyond conventional clinicopathological assessment remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether transcriptomic PGR expression provides complementary biological and prognostic information within reconstructed GENE70-derived genomic-risk categories and refines the characterization of endocrine-related tumour biology in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: This study analysed publicly available transcriptomic and clinical data from three cohorts: METABRIC (discovery cohort), GSE96058/SCAN-B cohort (validation cohort) and TCGA-BRCA cohort (molecular validation cohort). The GENE70-derived genomic-risk score was reconstructed for each cohort using matched genes. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis and subgroup comparisons were used to assess relationships between PGR expression, clinicopathologic variables, molecular features and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Across the three independent cohorts, low transcriptomic PGR expression was consistently associated with higher GENE70-derived genomic risk, increased MKI67 expression, reduced ESR1 expression and enrichment of the Luminal B subtype. Survival findings differed between cohorts. In the discovery METABRIC cohort, transcriptomic PGR expression showed heterogeneous associations with survival, particularly within GENE70-derived high-risk subgroups, whereas the external GSE96058/SCAN-B validation cohort demonstrated consistent associations between low PGR expression and poorer overall survival in both the overall ER-positive/HER2-negative population and GENE70-derived high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that transcriptomic PGR provides complementary biological and prognostic information within GENE70-derived genomic-risk categories. However, because treatment response was not evaluated in the present study, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of predictive or pharmacogenomic utility and prospective studies incorporating treatment-response analyses are required before such applications can be established.

Explore related subjects

HumansFemaleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast NeoplasmsReceptors, ProgesteroneReceptors, EstrogenBiomarkers, TumorPharmacogeneticsPrognosisGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingRisk AssessmentER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancerEndocrine resistanceGENE70-derived riskGSE96058Genomic riskLuminal breast cancerMETABRICMammaPrintPGR expressionProgesterone receptorSCAN-BTCGA-BRCAJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Orcun Can. 2026-12-01. PGR expression as a pharmacogenomic companion biomarker to GENE70-derived genomic risk in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.. https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps.2026.39.12.331.1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceBiomarkers, Tumor subjectBreast Neoplasms subjectER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer subjectEndocrine resistance subjectErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases subjectFemale subjectGENE70-derived risk subjectGSE96058 subjectGene Expression Profiling subjectGene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic subjectGenomic risk subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectLuminal breast cancer subjectMETABRIC subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

PubMed2026

Clinicopathological response and survival outcomes of HER2-low versus HER2-zero early breast Cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key biomarker for classification and treatment. A subgroup with HER2-low expression has been identified, but existing evidence is heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared pathological response and survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero early-stage breast cancer to clarify prognostic features. METHODS: This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251120506). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major oncology conferences were searched through September 2025. Cohort studies of early-stage breast cancer comparing HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ and ISH-negative) vs. HER2-zero with extractable pCR, DFS, or OS data were included. Studies involving HER2-positive patients or inconsistent definitions were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 115,182 patients were included. HER2-low patients showed significantly lower pCR rates (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.52-0.65). DFS favored HER2-low (multivariate HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.83), especially in HR+ tumors, with a weaker effect in HR- cases. OS also favored HER2-low (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.89), mainly driven by the HR- subgroup; no OS difference was seen in HR+ tumors. Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots indicated robust results with no apparent publication bias. Overall study quality was high (17 high-quality, 11 moderate-quality). CONCLUSION: HER2-low early breast cancer shows lower pCR after neoadjuvant therapy but better long-term survival. These findings support the clinical relevance of HER2-low as a biologically meaningful subgroup within HER2-negative disease, while its status as a stable and independent subtype still requires further validation through prospective studies, standardized testing, and multi-omics investigation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Tranexamic acid protects human dermal fibroblasts from D-galactose-induced senescence via the GPR30/MAPK pathway.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used for pigmentary disorders, but its anti-ageing potential remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether topical 3% TXA improves early periorbital wrinkles in women with facial melasma and to investigate whether TXA protects human dermal fibroblasts from D-galactose-induced senescence via the GPR30/MAPK pathway. METHODS: Fifty women with melasma were randomized to 3% TXA serum plus moisturizer or moisturizer alone for 8 weeks, with follow-up to week 12. Periorbital wrinkles were graded using a modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS). Separately, D-gal-induced senescence in HDFs was assessed via viability, SA-β-gal activity, senescence markers, ROS, antioxidant enzymes, SASP/ECM gene expression, and MAPK activation. GPR30 involvement was examined using antagonist G15, shRNA knockdown, and molecular docking. RESULTS: Topical TXA produced significantly greater MFWS reductions versus moisturizer alone at weeks 4, 8, and 12, with benefit persisting post-treatment. In HDFs, TXA preserved viability, reduced SA-β-gal positivity, attenuated p21/p16, restored Lamin B1, decreased ROS, and rescued antioxidant activities. TXA downregulated IL-6, IL-8, MMP1, and MMP3, and suppressed D-gal-induced ERK, JNK, and p38 phosphorylation. These effects were weakened by G15 or GPR30 knockdown; docking supported a stable TXA-GPR30 interaction. CONCLUSIONS: TXA showed clinical anti-wrinkle activity in melasma patients and protected HDFs from D-gal-induced senescence, partly via GPR30-dependent modulation of oxidative stress, SASP/ECM expression, and MAPK signalling. TXA is a promising candidate for skin ageing intervention.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical and genetic features of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms with dual-driver gene positivity.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical laboratory characteristics and gene mutation features of dual-driver gene positivity in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (Ph-negative MPN). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data and genetic test results from 203 newly diagnosed patients with Ph-negative MPN. Of these, 194 had single-driver gene positivity and 9 had dual-driver gene positivity. High-throughput sequencing was used to detect mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Clinical characteristics and gene mutation profiles were compared between the two patient groups. RESULTS: The incidence of dual-driver gene positivity was 4.4% (9/203), with the most common combinations being JAK2 with CALR (4 patients) and JAK2 with MPL (4 patients). Compared with the single-driver group, the dual-driver group had a significantly higher risk of bleeding [4.1% (8/194) vs. 33.3% (3/9), P = 0.008] and a higher proportion of uncommon mutations [3.6% (7/194) vs. 33.3% (3/9), P = 0.006]. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding age, thrombosis incidence, splenomegaly, or routine blood test indicators. During follow-up, 1 patient in the dual-driver group died from cerebrovascular disease. No leukaemia transformation or disease-related deaths occurred among the remaining patients. DISCUSSION: The increased bleeding risk in dual-driver patients may be related to a higher proportion of CALR mutations, elevated platelet counts, and higher variant allele frequencies, though these findings require validation in larger cohorts due to the small sample size. The higher prevalence of uncommon mutations suggests a more complex mutational landscape in this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Patients with Ph-negative MPN and dual-driver gene positivity may have a higher risk of bleeding and a more complex gene mutation profile.

Humans↗