Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42703925

Frequency of Human Brucellosis Complications in West Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a multi-systemic zoonotic infection. The West Asia/Middle East region is an important global hotspot for brucellosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to aggregate and synthesize all the available evidence regarding the complications of brucellosis in West Asia/Middle East region. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Proquest were searched. Selection of studies, data extraction, and the risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Data extraction was performed for 254 complications. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Where applicable small-study effects was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. Separate by-country, by-age, and by-publication-decade subgroup analyses were performed if feasible. RESULTS: Out of 9518 results, 240 studies (260 references) were included. The majority of the included studies were conducted in Turkey (n = 177). The reported complications varied and different complication categorization systems were detected. The highest pooled estimate was observed for musculoskeletal involvement (50%, 95%CI: 39%-61%, I2 = 96.63%). The evidences is up-to-date until March 4, 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Some complications such as the complications of the eye were not reported in all the countries. Therefore, it's recommended to determine the relative frequency of those complications in regions without such reports. The pooled estimates of different complications of brucellosis were different. There's a need for the standardization of the reporting of the complications of brucellosis to achieve comparability between studies and across different regions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aliasghar Fakhri-Demeshghieh, Elnaz Rostamzaman, Fatemeh Sayareh, Amir Nikoukar, Faranak Farahani, Farniya Bakhtiary Nia, Helia Sepahvand, Maryam Khaleghi, Mohammadsaeed Azamian, Mohammad Reza Shirzadi, Hesameddin Akbarein, Vahid Rahmanian. 2026. Frequency of Human Brucellosis Complications in West Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An updated systematic review of buffalo nutritional requirements (2000-2024).

Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are large ruminants with a superior ability to digest and utilize low-quality forages, producing milk and meat of higher quality compared to cattle. Despite their importance in animal production, buffaloes remain the focus of relatively few studies aimed at defining their nutritional requirements, which often results in inadequate diet formulation and management. There, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on buffalo nutritional requirements, considering only open-access papers published in English and in indexed journals. A total of 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of them focused on dairy buffaloes, particularly on the evaluation of crude protein, energy levels, and fiber content in the diet. Mineral nutrition was addressed in eight studies; however, in general the evaluated levels showed no significant effects. In contrast, very few or no studies were found concerning beef buffaloes, growing animals, reproduction, or other production stages. These findings highlight a critical gap in the literature and reinforce the urgent need to direct more research efforts and resources toward establishing species-specific nutritional requirements, particularly for beef buffaloes.

Animals

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines v2: An Update With New Criteria and Improved Clarifications.

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG) were developed to standardize and objectify the classification of putative disease-causing variants. These guidelines are sufficiently reproducible and are used to classify previously published and new disease-causing variants across species. Here, the guidelines are updated (AVCG.v2), based on a three-phase decision process. Overall, four new criteria and seven clarifying comments were added. The number of criteria has increased from 23 to 27, with three new criteria supporting pathogenicity and one new criterion supporting benign classification. Pharmacogenomic variants were determined to fall within the scope of the guidelines. These updated guidelines are being used by the Variant Pathogenicity Working Group (VPWG), part of the Animal Genetic Testing Standardization standing committee, which is a committee of elected members of the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Under the auspices of ISAG, the VPWG retrospectively classifies published putative disease-causing variants. The pathogenicity label for a variant will be presented in the variant tables of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA; https://omia.org/). The AVCGv.2 criteria and recommendations were developed by the expertise of the animal genetics community and the ISAG Executive Committee through the Animal Genetics Testing Standardization Committee endorses and strongly encourages their use to evaluate the evidence supporting pathogenicity of putative disease-causing variants.

Animals