Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42703509

Quantification of appetite-regulating hormones in children with hypothalamic and common obesity.

Abstract

CONTEXT: The pathophysiology of hypothalamic obesity (HyOb) remains incompletely understood with no effective treatments. OBJECTIVE: We examined differences in appetite-regulating hormone concentrations between patients with HyOb, common obesity, and lean controls. DESIGN: Multiway cross-sectional case-control study of patients aged 2 through 19 years. SETTING: Two tertiary pediatric endocrinology centers. PATIENTS: Cases were obese (body mass index [BMI] > +2 SD score [SDS], "HyOb") and lean ("HyLean") patients with congenital (septo-optic dysplasia) or acquired (suprasellar brain tumor) hypothalamic disorders. Controls had common obesity ("Ob") or nonhypothalamic disorders and normal BMI ("Lean"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationships between the Dykens' Hyperphagia Questionnaire Score (DHQS), plasma or serum concentrations of leptin, insulin, α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (αMSH), brain-derived neurotrophic factor, oxytocin, acylated ghrelin, agouti-related peptide and copeptin, and BMI SDS. RESULTS: Dykens' Hyperphagia Questionnaire Score did not differ between HyOb and Ob patients (24 [17-34] vs 24 [18-31]) but correlated with BMI SDS in patients with hypothalamic disorders (P = 0.02). HyOb and Ob patients exhibited similarly increased anorexigens (insulin, leptin) and decreased orexigens (ghrelin, agouti-related peptide) compared to HyLean and Lean patients. The rate of BMI increase was independently associated with lower αMSH (β = -0.23 [-0.36 to -0.11], P = .0007) and ghrelin (β=-0.004 [-0.01 to 0.00], P = .001) concentrations, suggesting that αMSH replacement may be a therapeutic target for HyOb. HyLean patients demonstrated intermediate insulin responses to glucose compared to other subcohorts. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patients with HyOb appeared indistinguishable from Ob in terms of their appetite and appetite-regulating neuroendocrine circuitry. Higher αMSH concentrations are associated with reduced weight gain and may be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hoong-Wei Gan, Clare Leeson, Helen Aitkenhead, Helen Alexandra Spoudeas, Mehul Tulsidas Dattani. 2026-08-19. Quantification of appetite-regulating hormones in children with hypothalamic and common obesity.. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvag195

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of intensive lifestyle interventions with calorie-carbohydrate-restricted diet versus time-restricted eating on appetite and binge eating in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

The impact of intensive lifestyle interventions on appetite regulation and binge eating in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of combined lifestyle interventions on appetite responses and binge eating in overweight or obese adults with T2D. In a randomized trial, 120 participants with T2D were allocated to three groups (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;40 each): (1) Calorie-carbohydrate restriction (CCR), (2) Time-restricted eating with CCR (TRE&#xa0;+&#xa0;CCR), or (3) Control. Intervention groups received structured exercise and behavioral education based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model. Appetite perceptions (hunger, satiety, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption) and binge eating (Binge Eating Scale; BES and objective binge episodes) were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using linear mixed models. Both CCR and TRE&#xa0;+&#xa0;CCR significantly improved subjective appetite compared with the control group at 12 and 24 weeks (all p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.01). At 24 weeks, hunger decreased by -24.1&#x202f;mm (95% CI: -35.8, -12.5) in the CCR group and -32.7&#x202f;mm (95% CI: -44.2, -21.3) in the TRE&#xa0;+&#xa0;CCR group. Satiety also increased by 21.7&#x202f;mm (95% CI: 9.46, 33.9) and 29.4&#x202f;mm (95% CI: 17.4, 41.4), respectively. Significant reductions were observed for desire to eat and prospective food consumption. In contrast, changes in BES and objective binge episodes were not significantly different between groups at any time point. No significant differences were detected between the CCR and the TRE&#xa0;+&#xa0;CCR groups. Intensive lifestyle interventions incorporating CCR or TRE&#xa0;+&#xa0;CCR effectively reduced appetite in adults with T2D but did not significantly affect binge eating. Future research should target individuals with higher baseline BES scores to clarify potential benefits for binge eating behavior.

Humans

Acute Stevia Consumption does not Alter Endocrine Responses in Individuals with Normal Weight, Overweight, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Stevia is a plant-based non-nutritive sweetener. Acute effects of stevia ingestion on glycemia and hormonal responses have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: This objective of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of beverages containing stevia alone and in combination with glucose on glycemic, hormonal, and appetite responses. METHODS: This study evaluated three cohorts of n=23 individuals with either normal weight (NW), overweight (OW), or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for which each individual completed four test conditions in a randomized sequence crossover study design. The four test conditions were beverages containing stevia (75.6 mg steviol equivalents), water, glucose (30 g), and stevia+glucose (30 g glucose+75.6 mg steviol equivalents). Blood samples were collected before and for 180 min after beverage consumption. Assessments included net area under the curve (niAUC) and incremental maximal concentration values for plasma glucose, insulin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon, and PYY. Appetite was assessed with visual-analog scale questions and energy consumption during an ad libitum meal. RESULTS: Responses to the stevia beverage did not differ significantly from those for water alone, and stevia + glucose did not differ significantly from glucose alone for any of the three groups. CONCLUSION: Acute stevia consumption did not materially alter responses for glycemia or hormones involved in glucose and appetite regulation, appetite ratings, or energy intake at a subsequent meal. Clinical Trial Registry number and website where it was obtained: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT05287906. Study Details | NCT05287906 | A Trial to Assess Steviol Glycosides on Acute Appetite Hormone Release | ClinicalTrials.gov.

Appetite

3D epigenomic remodelling mediated by Foxa1 drives gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine remains a cornerstone treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet the emergence of resistance constitutes a major clinical challenge with poorly understood epigenomic mechanisms. Here, we identified the pioneer transcription factor Foxa1 as a master regulator of gemcitabine resistance through multi-omics analysis. Mechanistically, Foxa1 drives widespread super-enhancer (SE) reprogramming and 3D genome remodelling in resistant cells, which coordinately activates the expression of key resistance genes, notably Rrm1 and Cdadc1. This is accompanied by increased chromatin accessibility, elevated H3K27ac enrichment at SEs, and enhanced Foxa1 binding at regulatory elements. Moreover, post-translational stabilization of Foxa1 via USP7-mediated deubiquitination sustains this epigenomic program. Genetic ablation of Foxa1 or specific SE regions near Rrm1 resensitizes resistant cells to gemcitabine. Building upon this mechanism, we demonstrate that bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitors, which disrupt SE function, potently reverse resistance. Notably, the clinical-stage BET inhibitor AZD5153, in combination with gemcitabine, achieves robust tumor suppression and overcomes resistance in cell-derived xenograft (CDX) models by dismantling the Foxa1-mediated resistant transcriptome and reinvigorating drug sensitivity. Our findings establish Foxa1-orchestrated enhancer reprogramming as a fundamental mechanism of gemcitabine resistance and unveil a promising epigenetic therapy to restore treatment efficacy in PDAC.

Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha