Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42703019

Co-location of services: an umbrella review to consider how primary care estates could be better used to support disadvantaged groups.

Helena Painter·Jatinder Hayre·Ananya Arora·Lucy Johnson·Anna Gkiouleka·Amy Dehn Lunn·Liam Loftus·Rebecca Rosen·John Ford
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AIM: To examine how co-located community and health services in primary care could support disadvantaged groups. BACKGROUND: Co-locating services is thought to improve access, collaboration, and patient outcomes. There are thousands of primary care premises across the UK. At a time of stagnating or widening health inequalities, they present an ideal opportunity to support communities, especially in disadvantaged areas. METHOD: We conducted a systematic umbrella review. Articles were retrieved from Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase with supplementary snowball and grey literature searches. Reviews of co-located services supporting disadvantaged groups in primary care between 2010 and February 2024 were included. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data and assessed quality. Outcomes relating to health, welfare, healthcare utilization, and activity and processes were assessed. Data were narratively synthesized using a convergent integrated approach. FINDINGS: 2626 studies were screened, supplemented by snowball and grey literatures searches. Thirteen reviews were included for synthesis. One review included meta-analysis. Three models of care were identified; legal advice, welfare advice, and complementary health care. Data were synthesized according to themes: access and engagement, quality of care, efficiency, improved health, and improved social factors. We found co-located services can improve access to care, engagement in treatment, and quality of care for disadvantaged groups. Improvements to social determinants of health and mental health and well-being outcomes were reported. Findings were inconsistent when considering the impact of co-location on efficiency. We conclude that co-located services in primary care have the potential to improve identification of people most in need and improve their access to high quality health care and social support. Policy makers and practitioners should maximize the use of primary care estates to support disadvantaged groups and communities.

Explore related subjects

HumansPrimary Health CareVulnerable PopulationsUnited KingdomHealth Services AccessibilityAccess to Primary CareCommunity Health ServicesCo-locationhealth inequalitiesintegrated caremental healthmulti-sector servicesprimary caresocial determinants of healthJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Helena Painter, Jatinder Hayre, Ananya Arora, Lucy Johnson, Anna Gkiouleka, Amy Dehn Lunn, Liam Loftus, Rebecca Rosen, John Ford. 2026-09-07. Co-location of services: an umbrella review to consider how primary care estates could be better used to support disadvantaged groups.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423626101728

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Health Services Accessibility subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Review resourceMental Health subjectPrimary Health Care subjectSystematic reviews studyhealth inequalities subjectprimary care subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The effectiveness of digital health interventions for type 2 diabetes in underserved populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials (1835 participants) evaluated whether digital health interventions (DHIs) improve glycemic control among underserved adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), including racial/ethnic minority, low-income, Medicaid-insured, rural, and low-health-literacy populations. Searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 20, 2025 identified eligible parallel-group randomized controlled trials reporting change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis showed that DHIs produced a modest but statistically significant HbA1c reduction versus control (mean difference, -0.37 %age points; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.30; P&#x202f;<&#x202f;.0001; equivalent to -4.0&#x202f;mmol/mol). Heterogeneity was moderate-to-substantial (I&#xb2; = 69.9%). Subgroup analyses suggested directionally similar effects by population group and intervention modality, but interpretation was limited by study-level data and the small number of trials. Funnel-plot inspection and Egger's test (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;.31) did not suggest major small-study effects, although power was limited. Overall certainty for HbA1c was moderate. DHIs may support more equitable diabetes care when implemented with cultural tailoring, language access, digital-literacy support, and technology-access safeguards.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Exploring Professional Experiences in Caring for Vulnerable Migrants in an Italian Rural Reception Centre: A Qualitative Study Using Multidimensional Textual Analysis-Professional Experiences in Rural Migrant Care.

AIM: This study aims to explore the experiences, strengths, challenges, and potential improvements for professionals in managing the complex needs of vulnerable migrants (VM) in an Italian rural reception centre. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in April 2024. Data were analysed using the Automatic Analysis of Textual Data, based on Fraire's seven-step model for Exploratory Multidimensional Data Analysis. DATA SOURCES: Data were collected from 16 professionals working in a rural reception centre in southern Italy. Interviews were conducted and analysed using AATD in April 2024. FINDINGS: The analysis identified two main dimensions of professionals' roles: balancing systemic responsibilities with personal engagement and managing immediate needs versus long-term integration goals. Professionals face significant challenges, such as resource scarcity, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and emotional fatigue, which impact their well-being and the quality of care provided to migrants. Resilience, adaptability, and multidisciplinary collaboration were identified as key strengths. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the dual nature of professionals' work in reception centres, requiring them to balance operational tasks with emotional involvement in migrant care. Targeted interventions and systemic reforms are necessary to support professionals and enhance the quality of care for vulnerable migrants, particularly in resource-constrained rural settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study underscores the importance of providing targeted support to professionals working in reception centres, including training in intercultural competence, stress management, and coping strategies. Policies should address systemic challenges and provide resources to enhance healthcare delivery and social integration programs. REPORTING METHOD: This study adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). The findings were reported in compliance with these guidelines, ensuring methodological rigour and transparency. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study highlights the critical need for targeted support and training for professionals working in reception centres, particularly in rural settings. To improve care for vulnerable migrants, professionals should receive training in intercultural competence, stress management, and coping strategies to better navigate the complex challenges they face. Furthermore, systemic changes are necessary to alleviate the pressures on reception centres, such as streamlining bureaucratic processes and enhancing healthcare infrastructure, particularly in rural areas where resources are limited. By addressing these needs, we can improve the well-being of both the professionals and the migrants they serve, fostering more effective support systems and better care outcomes. Additionally, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration and community engagement can contribute to more comprehensive and sustainable care models. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The Ethics Committee of the University of Rome Tor Vergata approved this study on 07/07/2021 (protocol registration number 160.21).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Understanding Suicide through Coroners' Narratives: implications for primary care from a mixed&#x2011;methods study of 157 Coroners' reports.

Suicide is a major public health concern, and general practice is often a recent point of contact before death. While mental illness is well recognised, the broader social and contextual factors influencing suicide risk remain under-reported in primary care and epidemiological research Aim To describe the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of individuals who died by suicide, integrating coronial quantitative data with qualitative narrative accounts to identify implications for primary/ secondary care and public health. Design and setting Explanatory sequential mixed&#x2011;methods study of 157 consecutive deaths by suicide recorded by coroners (2018-19) across five English local authorities. Method Demographic, clinical, and social data were extracted from coroners' records and summarised descriptively. Narrative case summaries were coded and analysed thematically to identify contextual, relational, and service factors preceding death. Results Of 157 individuals: 79% were male; 65% lived in the most deprived IMD quintile; 85% had a diagnosed mental health condition; 62% had a long&#x2011;term physical illness; 41% had a previous suicide attempt. About half consulted a GP in the preceding three months; mental health featured in about half of those consultations. Common stressors were relationship breakdown (37.2%), housing instability (22.1%), and work pressures (18.2%). Seven interlinked themes were identified: Mental health; Alcohol/Substance use, Physical health; Social connectedness; Life course trauma, Socioeconomic and Structural Vulnerability; Healthcare access. Service transitions were key vulnerability points Conclusion Coroners' records offer important insights into the complex circumstances preceding suicide and highlight opportunities for GPs to recognise intersectional complexity and support integrated, cross-sector suicide prevention approaches.

General Practice↗