Pharmacological and non-pharmacological modulation of striatal dopamine release: a meta-analysis of [11C]raclopride PET studies.

Abstract

The dopaminergic system has long been a central focus of functional neuroimaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the D2/D3 receptor radioligand [11C]raclopride remains the most widely used method for indirectly quantifying striatal dopamine release in vivo. However, no previous meta-analysis has studied the relative magnitude and regional distribution of dopamine release across different interventions or cognitive interventions overall. To address this gap, in this meta-analysis of 92 [11C]raclopride PET studies (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;1640), we compared the magnitude and regional distribution of dopamine release induced by amphetamine, methylphenidate, ketamine, alcohol, and cognitive challenges with and without reward. Amphetamine induced approximately four-fold greater dopamine release than cognitive challenges (10.9 vs. 2.7%, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and approximately twice that of alcohol (4.8%, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), with effects comparable to methylphenidate (11.5%) and slightly greater than ketamine (9.8%). Psychostimulant-induced increase in synaptic dopamine was greater in putamen and ventral striatum than in caudate, whereas alcohol preferentially engaged ventral striatum. Dopamine release did not differ between rewarded and non-rewarded cognitive tasks in the ventral striatum (p&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.14) or overall striatum (p&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.10). Methylphenidate-induced increases in synaptic dopamine appeared to attenuate with advancing age, whereas cognitive challenges were associated with greater dopamine release in older individuals. These findings demonstrate that individual pharmacological and cognitive interventions differ markedly in both magnitude and regional pattern of dopamine release. They also suggest that [&#xb9;&#xb9;C]raclopride PET may have limited sensitivity for distinguishing reward-related from non-reward-related dopamine release. These findings have implications for the design and interpretation of future neuroimaging studies of dopaminergic function in health and disease.