Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42687818

Independent prognostic value of semaphorin-4D, interleukin-1β and complement activation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Abstract

Multiple myeloma represents a systemic disease of the bone marrow (BM) niche, in which immune and skeletal pathways are tightly interconnected. However, the independent prognostic significance of bone and immune-related markers in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains incompletely understood. Semaphorin (Sema) 4D, activin-A, and periostin ELISA, LEGENDplex™ Human Bone Metabolism Panel and proteomic analysis for novel biomarker identification were conducted in 71 consecutive samples from NDMM patients. In 25 patients, genomic analysis was performed on sorted clonal plasma cells. NDMM patients had a median age at diagnosis of 65 years and a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Interleukin (IL)-1β and Sema4D levels predicted progression-free survival (PFS), highlighting their role in disease relapse. Proteomic profiling revealed a systemic signature associated with worse prognosis, enriched in complement activation components. Complement C5 significantly affected PFS and time to progression (TTP). IL-1β and C5 predicted PFS independently of the second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) stage, and a similar trend was noted for Sema4D. Myeloma bone disease (MBD) did not significantly affect overall survival, PFS, or TTP, suggesting that contemporary treatments mitigate its impact. Genomic analyses identified variants associated with inferior PFS, including HLA-DRB5 (c.300_306delinsCGGG) and HLA-DQB1 (c.317_319delinsCGG). Sema4D and the IL-1β-complement cascade emerged as key drivers of disease progression, independent of R2-ISS stage, representing potential prognostic and therapeutic targets in NDMM.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Panagiota-Efstathia Nikolaou, Charalampos Filippatos, Marios Miliotis, Ioannis V Kostopoulos, Panagiotis Bakouros, Manousos Makridakis, Christine-Ivy Liacos, Konstantinos Nikolopoulos, Stamatia Laidou, Anastasia Chatzidimitriou, Maria Frantzi, Efstathios Kastritis, Despina Fotiou, Maria Gavriatopoulou, Antonia Vlahou, Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou, Ourania Tsitsilonis, Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos, Evangelos Terpos. 2026-09-03. Independent prognostic value of semaphorin-4D, interleukin-1β and complement activation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2026.301208

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article