Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42682922

Genome-wide association study of asthma with high treatment burden and/or worse outcomes defined using electronic healthcare data in UK Biobank.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In ∼10% of asthma patients, symptoms remain uncontrolled despite maximal treatment, representing an unmet clinical need. The causal variants, genes and pathways underlying genetic risk factors have not been fully elucidated, and it is unclear whether there are unique genetic risk factors for this asthma subtype. METHODS: We used electronic healthcare records linked to UK Biobank to identify asthma patients with high treatment burden and/or worse outcomes. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) with this case population and healthy controls. We sought replication for associated (p≤5×10-6) signals in four independent studies (12 152 cases and 32 316 controls). Replicated signals were fine-mapped and linked to genes and pathways. RESULTS: In total, 7681 participants met our case definition and showed enrichment for adult-onset asthma, female gender and higher body mass index compared to asthma individuals not meeting case criteria. GWAS with 7681 cases and 38 405 controls revealed 21 reproducible association signals that had previously been associated with asthma, but had a larger effect size in our study. Variant-to-gene mapping highlighted 85 candidate genes, five of which were considered high confidence (BACH2, D2HGDH, IL1RL1, RPS26, SMAD3). CONCLUSION: We present the first use of electronic healthcare records in UK Biobank to identify a subtype of asthma enriched for patients with high treatment burden and/or worse outcomes. Our findings support the role of known asthma genes, highlighting genetic risk variants with stronger effect in these groups of patients. The prioritised genes provide potential therapeutic opportunities for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Noemi N Piga, Michael A Portelli, Nick Shrine, Jing Chen, Richard Packer, Kayesha Coley, Alexander T Williams, Chiara Batini, Catherine John, Sharon M Lutz, Kirsten R Voorhies, Albert M Levin, Nazanin Zounemat-Kermani, James E Gern, Diane R Gold, Tina V Hartert, Daniel J Jackson, Christine C Johnson, Gurjit K Khurana Hershey, Rachel L Miller, Christine M Seroogy, Edward M Zoratti, Don D Sin, Maarten van den Berge, Yohan Bossé, Robert J Hall, Dominick Shaw, Zara E K Pogson, Andrew Fogarty, Liam G Heaney, Adel H Mansur, Rekha Chaudhuri, Neil C Thomson, John W Holloway, Kian Fan Chung, John D Blakey, Louise V Wain, Carole Ober, Ann C Wu, Ian M Adcock, Ian P Hall, Christopher E Brightling, Glenda Lassi, Ian Sayers, Katherine A Fawcett. 2026-09-01. Genome-wide association study of asthma with high treatment burden and/or worse outcomes defined using electronic healthcare data in UK Biobank.. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00327-2026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article