Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42682829

Proteome-wide Mendelian randomisation of lung function to identify potential therapeutic targets for respiratory disease.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite multiple clinical trials, disease-modifying treatments for COPD are currently limited. Since many drugs target proteins, identifying causality between proteins and lung function informs understanding of COPD pathophysiology and may suggest novel targets. We used Mendelian randomisation (MR) to prioritise proteins as potentially causal for imparied lung function. For prioritised proteins, we explored their potential suitability as drug targets by predicting their effects on a range of clinical outcomes. METHODS: We used genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on 2923 proteins (n=48&#x2009;195, UK Biobank) to identify single genetic variants (protein quantitative trait loci (cis-pQTLs)) associated with protein levels (p&#x2264;5&#xd7;10-9, variant &#x2264;100&#x2005;kb of a transcription start site). We performed cis-pQTL-MR analyses of four spirometric traits (n=149&#x2009;166, 36 independent cohorts). Sensitivity analyses included colocalisation and reverse direction MR. We report associations between cis-pQTLs for prioritised proteins and multiple clinical respiratory outcomes, and use phenome-wide analysis to explore potential adverse effects or drug repurposing opportunities. FINDINGS: 1841 proteins had a suitable cis-pQTL. We implicated 16 proteins as potentially causal for lung function (p<1.71&#xd7;10-5): seven proteins have not been implicated by previous lung function GWAS or MR (CCND2, DTD1, PILRA, PTPRK, TDRKH, GRHPR, NUDT5), and we provide corroborative evidence for 10 proteins. We add to the literature identifying surfactant protein D (SFTPD) as a candidate, yet predict that integrin subunit alpha V (ITGAV) inhibition could impair some lung function measures, mimicking adverse results from a recent trial. INTERPRETATION: Our approach identifies proteins (some novel) that are potentially therapeutic targets for respiratory disease, and which warrant follow-up for utility and safety.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jing Chen, Nick Shrine, Kayesha Coley, Richard J Packer, Ahmed Edris, Abril G Izquierdo, Brandon Lim, Mikyeong Lee, Frank Dudbridge, Robin G Walters, Ian P Hall, Louise V Wain, Martin D Tobin, Anna L Guyatt, SpiroMeta Consortium and the CHARGE consortium. 2026-09-01. Proteome-wide Mendelian randomisation of lung function to identify potential therapeutic targets for respiratory disease.. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00828-2025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article