Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42678644

Interhospital transfer and outcomes after robotic emergency general surgery: a national analysis.

Ioannis Karikis·Yasmin Arda·Nikolaos Pachos·Matthew A Bartek·Lydia R Maurer·Joshua S Ng-Kamstra·John O Hwabejire·Michael P DeWane·Haytham M Kaafarani·Ali Salim·George C Velmahos·Charudutt N Paranjape
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The outcomes of patients transferred to receiving centers who subsequently undergo robotic EGS remain uncharacterized at a national level. We aimed to quantify the association between transfer and outcomes among adults undergoing robotic EGS. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2019) including adult nonelective admissions undergoing robotic EGS. Interhospital transfer versus direct admission was the exposure. Survey-weighted logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for clinical outcomes; generalized linear models with gamma family and log link estimated adjusted mean ratios (aMR) for length of stay (LOS) and cost. Average marginal effects provided adjusted risks/means and absolute differences. Among 26,869 unweighted robotic EGS admissions, representing an estimated 46,517 admissions nationally, 246 unweighted admissions were interhospital transfers, representing an estimated 444 transfers (1.0%) nationally. Transfers were older, more comorbid, and more severely ill and were treated predominantly at large, teaching hospitals. After adjustment, transfer was associated with a higher risk of postprocedural complications (8.0% vs. 3.5%; aRR 2.26, 95% CI 1.25-3.27), non-home discharge (31.2% vs. 18.9%; aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.92), longer LOS (11.49 vs. 5.53 days; AMR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78-2.42), and higher cost ($43,340 vs. $21,821; AMR 1.99, 95% CI 1.68-2.35). The association with postprocedural complications was attenuated after additional adjustment for APR-DRG Severity of Illness, whereas associations with non-home discharge, LOS, and cost persisted. Among patients undergoing robotic EGS, interhospital transfer is independently associated with higher complication burden and greater resource use. Transferred patients represent a small but distinctly high-risk subgroup whose worse outcomes may reflect drivers that extend beyond the choice of surgical approach.

Explore related subjects

HumansRobotic Surgical ProceduresPatient TransferRetrospective StudiesFemaleLength of StayMiddle AgedMalePostoperative ComplicationsAgedPatient ReadmissionTreatment OutcomeAdultGeneral SurgeryUnited StatesEmergency general surgeryHealthcare costsInterhospital transferRobotic surgeryTransfer penaltyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ioannis Karikis, Yasmin Arda, Nikolaos Pachos, Matthew A Bartek, Lydia R Maurer, Joshua S Ng-Kamstra, John O Hwabejire, Michael P DeWane, Haytham M Kaafarani, Ali Salim, George C Velmahos, Charudutt N Paranjape. 2026-09-01. Interhospital transfer and outcomes after robotic emergency general surgery: a national analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03876-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceAdult subjectAged subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectLength of Stay subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectPatient Readmission subjectPostoperative Complications subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

How I do it: 3-Suture robotic pyeloplasty: Step-by-step technique.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty is now a gold standard in the treatment of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We describe a standardized "3-suture" technique designed to facilitate the pyelo-ureteral anastomosis. We used this technique in 65 paediatric patients aged 3-17 years. Early major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III) occurred in 3 patients (4.6%). The median operative time was 150 min. Surgical success was achieved in 96% of cases at a median follow-up of 9.5 months. This 3-suture approach offers a highly reproducible method for robotic pyeloplasty, facilitating accurate anatomical reconstruction with excellent surgical outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Transabdominal lumbar approach (TALA) versus retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted renal surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Common robotic nephrectomy approaches access the kidney via transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) routes, each with distinct trade-offs. We developed the transabdominal lumbar approach (TALA), combining advantages of both accesses with improved visualisation and strategic trocar placement, and compared it with conventional RP in a prospective randomised controlled trial using technique-oriented intraoperative endpoints. METHODS: In this single-centre, prospective, open-label RCT, 40 patients were randomised to TALA (n = 18) or conventional RP (n = 22). Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years with a renal tumour or non-functional kidney requiring robot-assisted total or partial nephrectomy. Exclusions included prior surgery on the affected kidney, renal vein tumour thrombus, and pregnancy. Both groups were followed for 30 days. The primary endpoint was time from first skin incision to renal artery identification. RESULTS: TALA achieved a median time saving of 16 min compared to conventional RP (38 vs. 54 min, p = 0.001). Perioperative safety was comparable between groups, with three patients (7.5%) experiencing Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications. CONCLUSIONS: TALA met its primary endpoint with a significantly shorter time to renal artery identification than conventional RP access, and improving perceived surgical exposure and instrument handling.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic versus open pyeloplasty in infants under 6 months.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic pyeloplasties have become the popular approach for surgical repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in the pediatric population. In infants less than 6 months old, there is concern for lack of intra-abdominal working space and lack of benefit compared to an open approach. Our aim was to compare the peri-operative and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing open versus robotic pyeloplasty under six months of age. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients less than six months of age undergoing robotic or open pyeloplasty between 2020 and 2024 at a single institution. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected and compared. Surgical success was defined as a >50% reduction in the antero-pelvic diameter (APD) of the affected kidney at one year post pyeloplasty. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were identified (16 robotic and 16 open), median age at surgery was 4 months old. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay or narcotic usage between the two groups. The robotic cohort had a significantly longer operative time (209.5 min vs 142.5 min, p < 0.001) compared to the open cohort. There was no significant difference between post-operative complication or surgical success rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this small series, robotic and open pyeloplasty both remain viable options for infants less than 6 months of age with equivalent surgical outcomes and lengths of hospital stay.

Humans↗