Perioperative safety and survival outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: an overlap-weighted Asian cohort study.

Abstract

The value of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in elderly Asian patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains insufficiently defined. We retrospectively analyzed 339 patients (&#x2265;&#x2009;70 years) with localized RCC treated at a single Asian center between 2015 and 2025, including 119 undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) and 220 undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN). Propensity score overlap weighting (OW) was applied to compare PN versus RN and, within the PN cohort, RAPN versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Three open partial nephrectomy cases were summarized descriptively and retained only in exploratory sensitivity analyses. Weighted logistic regression and Cox models with robust standard errors evaluated Clavien-Dindo grade&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;II complications and overall survival (OS). After OW, PN was associated with better early postoperative renal functional preservation than RN but a greater incidence of grade&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;II complications (36.4% vs. 17.6%; weighted p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001); OS was similar. Within the PN cohort, RAPN had longer operative time than LPN (weighted p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.030), whereas warm ischemia time, early postoperative eGFR, and grade&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;II complications (31.8% vs. 40.4%; weighted p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.414) were not significantly different. Exploratory analyses favored RAPN, but only one death occurred in this group, and residual confounding remains possible. PN may preserve early renal function in selected older patients, while RAPN appears feasible in experienced centers; its survival association remains hypothesis-generating.