Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42669257

Toward real-time quantification of driving risks: a systematic review and research agenda of risk field theory.

Abstract

In complex traffic systems, driving risk often evolves in a continuous and progressive manner prior to crash occurrence. How to effectively represent and analyze such latent risk states remains a central challenge in traffic safety research. In recent years, risk field-based approaches have introduced spatial and spatiotemporal continuous modeling paradigms, providing new perspectives for characterizing the distribution of traffic risk and its dynamic evolution. Motivated by the rapid growth of this research area and the lack of a systematic synthesis, this paper presents a comprehensive review of studies applying risk field theory to driving safety and traffic risk analysis. Following the PRISMA guidelines, relevant literature was collected through multi-database searches and analyzed using a combination of bibliometric analysis and qualitative review. The review systematically summarizes the theoretical foundations, modeling elements, data sources, analytical methods, and application domains of risk field-related research. Particular attention is given to studies that conceptualize traffic risk as a continuous field, complemented by a broader review of traffic risk factor literature to identify key elements and analytical dimensions involved in risk field modeling. On this basis, the paper synthesizes research progress in major application areas, including traffic safety state representation, driving behavior analysis, traffic conflict assessment, and autonomous driving and human-machine cooperative systems. Differences and commonalities among existing studies are compared in terms of modeling strategies, data support, and application scenarios. Through this systematic review, the paper clarifies the main research themes and methodological trends of risk field-based studies, providing a structured framework for understanding the evolution and application of this approach and offering methodological insights for risk perception modeling and safety-oriented decision support in intelligent transportation systems (ITS).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Junjie Zhang, Kai Kang, Ghim Ping Ong, Xiaohui Li, Chen Wang, Yongfeng Ma. 2026-08-30. Toward real-time quantification of driving risks: a systematic review and research agenda of risk field theory.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2026.108749

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pilot Distractions and Interruptions in Airlines: Ranking of Sources by Analytic Hierarchy Process.

ObjectiveThis work establishes a methodological framework for sources of pilot distraction and interruptions in a structured model that can be used as a tool for cockpit design/procedure assessment.BackgroundPilots must complete complex tasks, and distractions can impair performance and lead to errors that can cause aircraft accidents. Although various cockpit distractors are examined individually, there is no integrated approach.MethodDistraction and interruption sources were identified through a literature review and confirmed/extended by interviews with airline pilots. Associated weights were determined through pairwise comparisons, yielding a hierarchical model using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Results26 sources of pilot distraction and interruptions were quantified and categorized into four categories: communication, head-down time, responding to abnormal conditions & unexpected situations, and searching for traffic.ConclusionA taxonomic structure for assessment is achieved with the top 5 sources identified as communications, technical interruptions, experience in type, environmental factors, operational irregularities, and airspace high terrain, accounting for 63.07%.ApplicationThe structured system is a flexible assessment scale that provides a taxonomic framework for airline risk management, supports future research, and cockpit design efforts.

Humans

Wildlife forensic DNA evidence links a suspected vehicle to a fatal lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) collision in Misiones, Argentina.

Vehicle collisions are recognized as a major driver of biodiversity loss, particularly in road-dense landscapes, exceeding the impact of invasive species and wildlife trafficking. For large-bodied, slow-reproducing, and low-abundance species, such as the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), this threat can have major impacts. Here, we present a wildlife forensic investigation in Misiones, Argentina, involving a tapir, a species afforded the highest level of legal protection as a Provincial Natural Monument. The fatal hit-by-vehicle (HBV) incident occurred in northern Misiones on 31 March 2019 along Provincial Route 19, in a portion that bisects Parque Provincial Urugua-í, with the driver involved in the collision leaving the scene. The suspect was later located and claimed that the damage to the vehicle resulted from a collision with a horse (Equus caballus) rather than a tapir. To legally resolve the incident, DNA (hair and blood) recovered from the suspected vehicle's bumper (evidence) was compared with tissue samples from the tapir carcass (reference). Genetic confirmation of species identity used a 110-bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, and individual identity was assessed using 12 species-specific microsatellite loci. These analyses confirmed that all evidence matched the tapir carcass at both species and individual levels, strongly supporting the association between the suspected vehicle and the HBV tapir, and refuting the alternative explanation proposed by the driver. This case demonstrates the value of using wildlife forensic genetics to reconstruct wildlife-vehicle collisions, supporting environmental law enforcement, and strengthening conservation efforts in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina.

Animals

Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis Among U.S. Young Adults Who Use Cannabis: Evidence From the 2021-2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC) and identify associated factors among U.S. young adult drivers reporting past-year cannabis use. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled 2021-2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The analytic data were restricted to drivers aged 18-25 years who reported past-year cannabis use (N = unweighted 17,141; weighted N = 10,814,381). The outcome was self-reported past-year DUIC. Independent variables included demographics, substance use, mental health, cannabis-related perceptions, and driving behaviors. These relationships were assessed by modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of DUIC was 28.0%, representing approximately over three million young adults. DUIC prevalence increased with cannabis use frequency, from 2.51 times higher among those using cannabis 12-49 days (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR]: 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29-2.75) to 3.63 times higher among those reporting use on 300-365 days (APR: 3.63; 95% CI: 3.60-3.76), compared with those using cannabis 1-11 days. Cannabis use disorder (APR: 2.34; 95% CI: 2.06-2.65), simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use (APR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.28-1.30), and perceived easy cannabis availability (APR: 2.36; 95% CI: 2.33-2.39) were also associated with higher prevalence of DUIC. Nonenrollment in school and living in a state with a medical cannabis law were associated with lower DUIC prevalence. DISCUSSION: DUIC is highly prevalent among U.S. young adults who use cannabis, with a clear graded association across categories of cannabis use frequency. Public health interventions should address frequent use, cannabis use disorder, alcohol-cannabis co-use, and perceived cannabis availability.

Humans