Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42623774

Patient experiences of diagnostic uncertainty in musculoskeletal care: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

William Reeve·Carl Wong·Fabrizio Brindisino·Giacomo Rossettini·Rachel Chester
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis plays a central role in musculoskeletal care. However, establishing a clear diagnosis is often challenging, and diagnostic uncertainty is common. OBJECTIVES: To explore patient experiences of diagnostic uncertainty in musculoskeletal care. METHODS: Five databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, AMED, Web of Science) were searched from inception to October 2025. Qualitative studies involving semi-structured interviews with adults receiving care for MSK conditions were included. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Checklist. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis, and confidence in findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach (GRADE-CERQual). RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 462 participants were included. Critical appraisal identified 23 studies with varying methodological limitations; all studies were included in the synthesis. Nine descriptive themes were synthesised into three analytical themes: (1) patient expectations and perceived meanings of a diagnosis and interpretations of diagnostic uncertainty; (2) the multi-dimensional experience of diagnostic uncertainty; and (3) the role of contextual factors, particularly communication and the therapeutic relationship, in shaping experiences of diagnostic uncertainty. Using GRADE-CERQual, confidence in these themes was rated as low, moderate and very low, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic uncertainty is a subjective and multi-dimensional experience shaped in part by patients' expectations and the meanings attributed to diagnosis. Its impact spans predominantly cognitive and affective domains and may influence clinical presentation. Patient-centred communication and strong therapeutic relationships may support patients in navigating diagnostic uncertainty in musculoskeletal care.

Explore related subjects

AdultHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesQualitative ResearchUncertaintyJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

William Reeve, Carl Wong, Fabrizio Brindisino, Giacomo Rossettini, Rachel Chester. 2026-08-18. Patient experiences of diagnostic uncertainty in musculoskeletal care: a systematic review of qualitative studies.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103639

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Adult subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Review resourceSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The musculoskeletal pain literacy questionnaire (MSK-PLq) - Part 1: Development of a preliminary version through a systematic review and Delphi consensus.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and self-management is a first-line approach recommended by international clinical guidelines. Access to evidence-based information that enhances health literacy may support patients' engagement in their self-management and treatment decision-making, potentially reducing disease burden and pain. However, no tool currently exists to assess health literacy specifically in MSK pain. This study aimed to develop and describe the preliminary version of a knowledge-based questionnaire to evaluate MSK pain literacy, the Musculoskeletal Pain-Literacy questionnaire (MSK-PLq). METHODS: A systematic literature review identified existing health literacy instruments and generated a preliminary list of domains. A two-round Delphi study with 22 panellists (19 experts and three people living with chronic MSK pain), followed by consensus meetings, was used to refine domains and items (≥70% agreement). Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score and three stakeholders were consulted to review the questionnaire for comprehensibility, clarity, and face validity. RESULTS: Six domains were retained (Understand, Access, Appraise, Apply, Digital, Beliefs), comprising 20 items in the preliminary version of MSK-PLq. Readability was acceptable (mean FRE 74, indicating fairly easy reading), and subject feedback supported the questionnaire's clarity and face validity. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary version of the MSK-PLq is proposed as the first knowledge-based tool to assess functional, interactive, and critical aspects of MSK pain literacy. It may have applications in clinical practice, research, education, and digital health, by informing tailored patient education and supporting self-management strategies, although further psychometric validation is required.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

[Clinical efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture at the motor area for Parkinson's disease with musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) at the motor area for Parkinson's disease (PD) with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with PD accompanied by musculoskeletal pain were randomly assigned to an EA group (29 cases, 1 case dropped out) and a sham EA group (29 cases, 1 case dropped out). The EA group was treated with EA at the motor area contralateral to the painful side (for bilateral pain, the left motor area was selected), using disperse-dense wave (2 Hz/20 Hz), with a current intensity of 1-2 mA, and needles were retained for 30 min. The sham EA group was treated with sham EA at non-acupoint area located 5-20 mm posterior to the motor area contralateral to the painful side. The connection mode was the same as that in the EA group, but no electrical current was delivered, and the needles were retained for 30 min. Both groups were treated once daily for 5 consecutive days. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part &#x2162; (UPDRS-&#x2162;), 24-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD-24), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA), and 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores were evaluated before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion in the two groups. Safety was also assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: In both groups, VAS scores for pain after treatment and at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion were lower than those before treatment (P<0.01, P<0.05). VAS scores for pain in the EA group were lower than those in the sham EA group after treatment and at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion (P<0.05). In the EA group, UPDRS-&#x2162;, HAMD-24, HAMA, and PDQ-39 scores after treatment and at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05, P<0.01). In the sham EA group, there were no statistically significant differences in UPDRS-&#x2162;, HAMD-24, HAMA, and PDQ-39 scores at any post-treatment time point compared with those before treatment (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in UPDRS-&#x2162;, HAMD-24, HAMA, and PDQ-39 scores between the two groups at any post-treatment time point (P>0.05). No serious adverse events occurred during the trial. CONCLUSION: EA at the motor area could reduce pain intensity in patients with PD accompanied by musculoskeletal pain, and improve pain-related motor symptoms, emotional status, and quality of life, with a favorable safety profile.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Impact of creatine supplementation alone or combined with exercise on inflammatory and clinical outcomes in chronic musculoskeletal pain treated in the rheumatological field: a systematic review.

Creatine supplementation has demonstrated ergogenic and anabolic effects in healthy and clinical populations. However, its potential therapeutic role in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain treated in rheumatological contexts remains unclear. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of creatine supplementation on pain, physical function/disability, quality of life, muscle strength, skeletal muscle mass, and inflammatory markers in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain usually treated from the rheumatological field. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and EMBASE up to July 2026. Eligible studies were randomized or nonrandomized clinical trials that provided creatine supplementation alone or in combination with exercise as a treatment compared to a control or placebo group. Eight studies (n = 189) were included, encompassing fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Creatine dosages varied from chronic low-dose to loading protocols (20 g/d, 2-5 g/d). Combined creatine plus resistance training may improve strength, skeletal muscle mass, and quality of life beyond exercise alone in osteoarthritis. Trials on fibromyalgia suggest an increase in muscle strength, but inconsistent effects on pain. Rheumatoid arthritis studies suggest gains in skeletal muscle mass and, in pilot studies, reduced disease activity. No major adverse events were reported. In conclusion, creatine supplementation alone may be insufficient to obtain clinical benefits, while combined with resistance exercise it could offer potential benefits for muscle strength, skeletal muscle mass and certain aspects of quality of life in these clinical conditions. However, evidence on pain and inflammation remains limited; Furthermore, the response across different clinical conditions is heterogeneous, highlighting the need for larger, high-quality trials.

Humans↗