Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42594031

SPEN inactivation drives resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in metastatic prostate cancer.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) has become the standard of care for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. However, there remains an unmet need to identify biomarkers for treatment resistance. Here, we identify SPEN inactivation as a driver of ARPI resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pre-clinical studies were performed in LNCaP and VCaP cell lines. Data from a nationwide prostate cancer clinico-genomic database were extracted. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) on ARPI with/without SPEN mutations. SPEN immunohistochemistry was performed on a rapid autopsy metastatic tissue microarray. RESULTS: SPEN was identified as a top enzalutamide resistance hit in an unbiased genome-wide loss-of-function screen. SPEN inactivation results in upregulation of cell cycle proliferation and basal/stem cell activity as well as increased translation of pro-oncogenic genes. In a large patient cohort (N=6828), SPEN mutations are enriched following treatment with ARPIs (2.1% to 3.6%, p=0.001) and correlate with shorter TTNT on ARPI in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (6.4 vs 29.7 months, HR 2.67, p=0.02). In a metastatic rapid autopsy cohort (N=181), low SPEN H-score is associated with shorter time on abiraterone (5.0 vs 7.9 months, p=0.023) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world cohorts, loss of SPEN function across genomic, transcriptomic, and protein levels is associated with reduced benefit from ARPI therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. These findings identify SPEN inactivation as a clinically relevant biomarker of ARPI resistance that warrants prospective evaluation to guide treatment selection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven Blinka, Sonali Arora, Dmytro Rudoy, Anika Gowda, Peter Yong, Yisoo Hwang, Michael D Nyquist, Ryon Graf, Gerald Li, Peter S Nelson, Michael T Schweizer, Andrew C Hsieh. 2026-08-13. SPEN inactivation drives resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in metastatic prostate cancer.. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-1405

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article