Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42592788

Recent advances in Strongyloides screening, diagnostics, therapeutics, and management.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Strongyloidiasis affects an estimated 30-100 million people globally and can have life-threatening consequences in immunocompromised hosts, yet it remains underdiagnosed due to limited access and performance of available diagnostics. Novel assays and anthelmintics may reshape screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention for at-risk populations. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in molecular diagnostics coupled with robust stool extraction methods have supplanted traditional parasitologic methods in settings where nucleic acid amplification is feasible. Transition from standard immunoglobulin G (IgG)-based immunoassays to the new IgG- and IgG4-based rapid diagnostic tests using recombinant Strongyloides stercoralis nematode immunodominant E antigen (NIE) and/or S. stercoralis immunoreactive antigen (SsIR) has facilitated serologic screening at the point of care. The World Health Organization now conditionally recommends community-wide ivermectin mass drug administration in highly endemic settings. Regarding new treatment options, moxidectin is noninferior to ivermectin with 93-94% cure rates and a longer half-life, while emodepside shows 80-90% predicted cure rates in early trials and offers a mechanistically distinct option. Understanding of immunosuppressed populations at risk for hyperinfection has expanded, prompting updated screening recommendations. SUMMARY: Serologic and molecular tools are improving screening and diagnosis, and moxidectin and emodepside may broaden treatment options, but data in severe disease and special populations remain limited. Priorities include harmonized screening algorithms and prospective studies in high-risk groups.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eva H Clark, Thomas B Nutman. 2026-08-12. Recent advances in Strongyloides screening, diagnostics, therapeutics, and management.. https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.0000000000001217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An updated systematic review of buffalo nutritional requirements (2000-2024).

Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are large ruminants with a superior ability to digest and utilize low-quality forages, producing milk and meat of higher quality compared to cattle. Despite their importance in animal production, buffaloes remain the focus of relatively few studies aimed at defining their nutritional requirements, which often results in inadequate diet formulation and management. There, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature on buffalo nutritional requirements, considering only open-access papers published in English and in indexed journals. A total of 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of them focused on dairy buffaloes, particularly on the evaluation of crude protein, energy levels, and fiber content in the diet. Mineral nutrition was addressed in eight studies; however, in general the evaluated levels showed no significant effects. In contrast, very few or no studies were found concerning beef buffaloes, growing animals, reproduction, or other production stages. These findings highlight a critical gap in the literature and reinforce the urgent need to direct more research efforts and resources toward establishing species-specific nutritional requirements, particularly for beef buffaloes.

Animals

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines v2: An Update With New Criteria and Improved Clarifications.

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG) were developed to standardize and objectify the classification of putative disease-causing variants. These guidelines are sufficiently reproducible and are used to classify previously published and new disease-causing variants across species. Here, the guidelines are updated (AVCG.v2), based on a three-phase decision process. Overall, four new criteria and seven clarifying comments were added. The number of criteria has increased from 23 to 27, with three new criteria supporting pathogenicity and one new criterion supporting benign classification. Pharmacogenomic variants were determined to fall within the scope of the guidelines. These updated guidelines are being used by the Variant Pathogenicity Working Group (VPWG), part of the Animal Genetic Testing Standardization standing committee, which is a committee of elected members of the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Under the auspices of ISAG, the VPWG retrospectively classifies published putative disease-causing variants. The pathogenicity label for a variant will be presented in the variant tables of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA; https://omia.org/). The AVCGv.2 criteria and recommendations were developed by the expertise of the animal genetics community and the ISAG Executive Committee through the Animal Genetics Testing Standardization Committee endorses and strongly encourages their use to evaluate the evidence supporting pathogenicity of putative disease-causing variants.

Animals