Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42572071

Efficacy of a high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for craving reduction in adolescents with gaming disorder: a 4-week randomized control trial with 24-week follow-up.

Chuanwei Li·Xuqin Wang·Feng Zhu·Ning Cheng·Longjun Zhu·Xiaoyun Dai·Huan Jiang·Na Zhong·Xiaobin Zhang·Wenxi Sun·Xiangdong Du
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the widespread popularity of online gaming, gaming addiction has come under scrutiny. While there is ongoing research on the diagnosis and treatment of gaming disorder among adolescents, the clinical robustness and reliability of intervention strategies remain uncertain. METHODS: A 4-week, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive, high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in alleviating psychological craving in adolescents diagnosed with gaming disorder. Sham rTMS was administered to the control group using the tilted-coil method. Both groups of participants were treated with SSRI medications. A total of 80 adolescents with gaming disorder participated in this study, and 73 ultimately completed the 24-week follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in craving levels before and after the rTMS intervention, as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included changes in anxiety and depression levels before and after the intervention, as assessed by the HAMA and HAMD. RESULTS: We assessed levels of psychological craving, anxiety, and depression among adolescents with gaming disorder at baseline, after completing a 4-week intervention, and at a 24-week follow-up post-intervention. Our repeated-measures MANOVA results, adjusted for course variables, revealed a significant main effect of rTMS intervention on psychological craving levels in adolescents addicted to online games (F(11, 781)&#x2009;=&#x2009;11.238, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001, partial &#x3b7;&#xb2; = 0.142), as well as significant main effects on time (F(11, 781)&#x2009;=&#x2009;6.809; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001, partial &#x3b7;&#xb2; = 0.091) and group effects (F(1, 71)&#x2009;=&#x2009;26.707, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001, partial &#x3b7;&#xb2; = 0.282). In addition, repeated-measures ANOVA results showed significant time effects for anxiety (F(2, 142)&#x2009;=&#x2009;20.747, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001, partial &#x3b7;&#xb2; = 0.234) and depression levels (F(2, 142)&#x2009;=&#x2009;22.277, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001, partial &#x3b7;&#xb2; = 0.285) among adolescents with gaming disorder, with nonsignificant between-group effects and no intergroup interaction. In the active stimulation group, changes in psychological craving levels after 4 weeks of treatment were significantly and positively correlated with changes in anxiety levels after 4 weeks of treatment in adolescents addicted to online games (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.335, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that high-frequency rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may be a promising approach for reducing psychological craving in adolescents with gaming disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2500102979 in chictr.org.cn, registered on May 22, 2025.

Explore related subjects

HumansAdolescentTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCravingMaleDouble-Blind MethodFemaleInternet Addiction DisorderFollow-Up StudiesAnxietyTreatment OutcomeVideo GamesDepressionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesBehavior, AddictiveAdolescentsGaming disorderrTMSJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chuanwei Li, Xuqin Wang, Feng Zhu, Ning Cheng, Longjun Zhu, Xiaoyun Dai, Huan Jiang, Na Zhong, Xiaobin Zhang, Wenxi Sun, Xiangdong Du. 2026-08-10. Efficacy of a high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for craving reduction in adolescents with gaming disorder: a 4-week randomized control trial with 24-week follow-up.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-026-02343-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resourceAdolescent subjectAnxiety subjectCraving subjectDepression subjectDouble-Blind Method subjectFemale subjectFollow-Up Studies subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Adjunctive intermittent theta-burst stimulation for first-episode schizophrenia: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) combined with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in first-episode schizophrenia remains unclear. This study evaluated adjunctive iTBS with risperidone and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and explored serum biomarkers indicating treatment response. METHODS: In this randomized, assessor-blind trial, 100 first-episode schizophrenia patients received either iTBS plus risperidone and CBT (iTBS group, n = 50) or risperidone and CBT alone (control, n = 50) for 3 months. The primary outcome was change in PANSS total score at 4 weeks and 3 months. Response was defined as a &#x2265; 50 % PANSS reduction. Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MCCB subtests) and serum GDNF, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels. RESULTS: The iTBS group showed significantly greater reduction in PANSS total scores than controls at both 4 weeks and 3 months (mean difference at 3 months: -13.3, 95 % CI: -16.8 to -9.8; P < 0.001), with a higher responder rate (76 % vs. 48 %). Significant improvements across all cognitive domains were observed in the iTBS group (all P < 0.001). Post-treatment, the iTBS group exhibited higher GDNF and lower cortisol and DHEA-S levels (all P < 0.001). A combined biomarker panel demonstrated superior discriminative performance for treatment efficacy (AUC=0.865 after cross-validation). Adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding iTBS to risperidone and CBT significantly improves clinical symptoms and cognitive function in first-episode schizophrenia. The combination of GDNF, cortisol, and DHEA-S shows promise as a composite biomarker for treatment response, though sham-controlled validation is warranted.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a subcategory of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), used to modulate brain plasticity and improve post-stroke recovery. Neuronavigation is used to improve the accuracy of stimulation with the aim of achieving a superior clinical outcome than with conventional targeting. The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of navigated rTMS in subacute and chronic stroke patients in comparison to sham stimulation. We conducted a systematic-review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL. Trials employing neuronavigated rTMS were included of these five types; high and low frequency rTMS, intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (TBS) and Hebbian-type stimulation. 13 RCTs were included after a screening of 1900 studies. 606 patients receiving either active (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;360) or sham stimulation (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;246) were assessed. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) favored rTMS over sham SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.4 (95&#xa0;%CI: 0.11-0.69), with moderate heterogeneity I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;55&#xa0;%. Among stimulation modalities, continuous TBS showed the largest pooled effect. rTMS was also associated with significant improvements in disability-related outcomes, SMD&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.61 (95&#xa0;% CI 0.14-1.08). Navigated rTMS is associated with modest but significant improvements in motor and disability outcomes in subacute and chronic stroke. Large comparative trials are required to clarify the potential added value over conventional targeting approaches.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Pilot randomized trial of intermittent theta-burst stimulation versus H-Coil transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (figure-8-coil iTBS) and H7-coil repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are FDA-cleared treatments for major depression; yet their comparative effectiveness in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has not been evaluated in randomized trials. This pilot randomized trial was designed to obtain preliminary comparative estimates and to explore whether baseline cognitive functioning relates to early remission. METHODS: Twenty-eight adults with TRD were randomized to six weeks of figure-8-coil iTBS delivered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (n = 15) or H7-coil rTMS delivered to the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) (n = 13). The primary outcome was change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD-17) score from baseline to week 6, analyzed with ANCOVA. Additional outcomes included response, remission, and symptom trajectories through week 18. Exploratory analyses examined the association between baseline cognitive functioning, such as executive functions and memory, and remission. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants completed all 30 sessions. Adjusted week-6 HRSD-17 scores did not differ between groups (mean difference -0.40, 95% CI -5.23 to 4.43; p=.865). Response rates were 40.0% for figure-8-coil iTBS and 50.0% for H7-coil rTMS (p>.60), and remission rates were identical across groups (20.0%). Remitters showed higher baseline executive functioning than non-remitters in exploratory analyses, although these associations were not confirmed in adjusted models. CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, figure-8-coil iTBS and H7-coil rTMS showed symptom improvement, with no clear between-group differences. Exploratory findings suggest a potential signal involving executive functioning that warrants further investigation. These results inform the feasibility and design of larger comparative trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05902312).

Adult↗