Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42556163

Role of nicotine metabolite ratio in pharmacological interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Ying Xie·Yingman Gao·Xinmei Zhou·Tingfen Ji·Zhao Liu·Ailifeire Aihemaiti·Shunyi Shi·Hang Liu·Min Wang·Anqi Cheng·Liang Zhao·Dan Xiao·Chen Wang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence suggests that the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) may influence the efficacy of smoking cessation, yet its role across pharmacotherapies remains unclear. This study aims to investigate how NMR affects cessation outcomes under different medications to guide personalized treatment. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to September 30, 2024) for randomized controlled trials on pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation with NMR data. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessment. The primary outcome was verified smoking cessation rate at the end of treatment or the closest time-point. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with accessible full text were included in the qualitative analyses and nine were included in the quantitative synthesis. For non-titratable nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), normal/fast metabolizers demonstrated lower odds of smoking cessation than slow metabolizers (Odds Ratio, OR=0.81, 95% confidence interval, CI=0.68-0.96; 5 studies, I²=62.5%). No significant associations were shown between normal/fast and slow metabolizers using titratable NRT (OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.95-1.14; 2 studies, I²=0%), bupropion (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.38-1.16; 2 studies, I²=51.4%), or varenicline (OR=1.17, 95% CI=0.79-1.74; 4 studies, I²=59.8%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence demonstrates that NMR moderates' treatment efficacy among those who smoke using non-titratable NRT, with slow metabolizers achieving significantly better cessation outcomes than normal/fast metabolizers. Substantial further research is needed to determine optimal medication hierarchies across metabolic profiles.

Explore related subjects

HumansSmoking CessationNicotine Replacement TherapyNicotineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmoking Cessation AgentsBupropionNicotine metabolite ratioNicotine replacement therapySmoking cessationVareniclineJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ying Xie, Yingman Gao, Xinmei Zhou, Tingfen Ji, Zhao Liu, Ailifeire Aihemaiti, Shunyi Shi, Hang Liu, Min Wang, Anqi Cheng, Liang Zhao, Dan Xiao, Chen Wang. 2026-07-28. Role of nicotine metabolite ratio in pharmacological interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2026.113294

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Humans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Review resourceMeta-Analysis subjectNicotine Replacement Therapy subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Optimizing smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and counseling for adult primary care patients: a factorial randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Even with the most effective smoking cessation pharmacotherapies (i.e., varenicline or combination nicotine replacement [C-NRT]), the majority of people ultimately return to smoking. This research explored how to optimize the use of varenicline and C-NRT to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Primary care patients participated in a 2x2x2x2 factorial experiment that evaluated 4 factors: 1) Medication Type (Varenicline vs. C-NRT [patch + mini-lozenge]), 2) Preparation (pre-quit) Medication (4 Weeks vs. Standard); 3) Medication Duration (Extended [24 weeks] vs. Standard [12 weeks]); and 4) Counseling Type (Cessation Counseling [4 sessions] vs. Referral Support [2 sessions focused on use of referral resources]). This study was discontinued prior to reaching the proposed sample size (N = 608) due to pandemic-related budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Participants (N = 496) were 55% women and 45.6% Black individuals. There were no statistically significant main effects of the 4 factors on abstinence at 12, 26 or 52 weeks. There was a 3-way interaction between Medication Type, Preparation Medication, and Counseling Type (p = 0.04) predicting the primary outcome of biochemically confirmed abstinence at 52 weeks; cessation counseling vs. referral support improved varenicline quit rates when 4 weeks versus 1 week of pre-quit medication was offered. For C-NRT, counseling type did not significantly improve quit rates regardless of the use of preparation medication. CONCLUSIONS: There was no robust evidence that enhanced pre-quit or extended duration of varenicline or C-NRT increased abstinence rates. More intensive counseling may support cessation for different pharmacotherapy regimens. Given the lack of consistent findings, this research should be viewed as exploratory to guide future research.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effectiveness of tobacco cessation interventions delivered in clinical settings in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the burden of tobacco use, access to cessation support in South Asia remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates the effectiveness of tobacco cessation interventions delivered in clinical settings in South Asia. METHODS: Five relevant databases were searched from inception to February 2025. Eligibility criteria included randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating behavioral, pharmacotherapy, and multicomponent interventions delivered in clinical settings in South Asia. Data on study setting and design, participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses using random-effect models were conducted where possible. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included (22 randomized and 15 non-randomized). Interventions involved pharmacotherapy (n = 6; 16.2%), nicotine replacement therapy (n = 7; 18.9%), behavioral counseling (n = 12; 32.4%), or combined/multicomponent interventions (n = 12; 32.4%). Most studies were conducted in India (n = 26; 70.3%), followed by Pakistan (n = 6; 16.2%), Nepal (n = 3; 8.1%), and two studies (5.4%) were multi-country in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Pooled analyses demonstrated higher quit rates among intervention versus control for continuous abstinence at 0-3 months (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.06 to 1.37) and >3 months (RR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.1.4 to 2.47), and for point abstinence at >3 months post-intervention (RR: 2.03, 95%CI:1.35 to 3.08). Heterogeneity was high for all analyses (I2 range: 94% to 97%). Combined behavioral and pharmacotherapy interventions were most effective (RR: 1.70, 95%CI: 0.98 to 2.92), although not statistically significant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Tobacco cessation interventions delivered in clinical settings in South Asia are effective, particularly when combining behavioral support with pharmacotherapy. However, evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of flavored on!® nicotine pouch products on smoking behaviors: A sequential, multiple assignment, randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether flavored versus unflavored nicotine pouch (NP) access affects cigarette reduction and smoke exposure among adults who smoke daily, and whether delayed flavor introduction affects these outcomes. METHODS: Adults who smoked ≥ 5 cigarettes/day (CPD) with interest in replacing cigarettes with NPs were enrolled in a remote, six-week, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (n = 402 randomized; n = 400 analyzed). Participants were randomized to immediate access to seven NP flavors (Flavor), unflavored-only access for six weeks (Original), or unflavored-only for three weeks followed by flavor access (Delayed Flavor). Primary outcomes were ≥ 50% reduction in weekly mean expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) from baseline and mean CO at Week 6. Secondary outcomes included ≥ 50% CPD reduction, mean CPD, CO-verified 7-day abstinence, and incident smoke-free days. RESULTS: At Week 6, Flavor and Original did not differ in ≥ 50% CO reduction (14.3% vs 14.2%; IRR=1.0, 95% CI=0.6-1.8) or mean CO (18.3 vs 16.5 ppm; β=1.9, 95% CI=-1.3-5.0). CPD decreased across groups by Week 6, with no differences between Flavor and Original in ≥ 50% CPD reduction (50.3% vs 51.6%; IRR=1.0, 95% CI=0.8-1.2) or CO-verified abstinence (9.3% vs 8.9%; IRR=1.0, 95% CI=0.5-2.2). Flavor increased smoke-free days early, with attenuation over time. Among Week 3 non-responders, delayed flavor access increased ≥ 50% CPD reduction at Week 6 (33.3% vs 18.6%; IRR=1.8, 95% CI=1.0-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: NP access supported cigarette reduction regardless of flavor availability, but flavors may accelerate smoke-free days and improve response among individuals who do not reduce cigarette consumption with unflavored products alone.

Humans↗