Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42544937

Adductor Canal Block and Local Anesthetic Versus Local Anesthetic Alone in ACL Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reza Ojaghi·Eric Locke·Pardise Elmi·Michael Pickell
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is crucial for early recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) are common regional techniques, but their combined efficacy remains unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of LIA alone versus LIA combined with ACB in patients undergoing ACLR, with primary outcomes including postoperative opioid consumption and quadriceps function. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: LIA + sham (saline injection) (n = 50) and LIA + ACB (n = 50). The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, quadriceps function assessed by straight leg raise (SLR) at 3 hours, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1 week. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests and chi-square tests with a P value <.05 considered significant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 24-hour opioid consumption between the LIA + ACB and LIA-only groups (P = .109). Similarly, VAS pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively showed no significant differences between the groups (P = .0804). Early functional recovery, assessed by SLR performance at 3 hours, was equivalent between groups (P = .6711). Additionally, QoR-15 scores on postoperative day 1 and KOOS values at 1 week demonstrated no significant differences (P = .6486 and P = .9054, respectively). Intraoperative opioid consumption was not different between the groups (P = .127). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the addition of ACB to LIA does not yield postoperative analgesic in ACLR. Consequently, LIA alone suffices for routine ACLR, potentially enabling clinicians to optimize perioperative workflows without incurring the additional time, financial burden, and resources associated with routine ACB administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04721119.

Explore related subjects

HumansDouble-Blind MethodAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemalePostoperative PainAnesthetics, LocalAdultMaleNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidYoung AdultPain MeasurementQuadriceps MuscleAdolescentACL reconstructionadductor canal blocklocal infiltration analgesiapostoperative opioid useJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Reza Ojaghi, Eric Locke, Pardise Elmi, Michael Pickell. 2026-08-03. Adductor Canal Block and Local Anesthetic Versus Local Anesthetic Alone in ACL Reconstruction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465261464409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Comparative Study resourceAdolescent subjectAdult subjectAnalgesics, Opioid subjectAnesthetics, Local subjectComparative Study subjectDouble-Blind Method subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectNerve Block subjectPain Measurement subjectPostoperative Pain subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Association of Early Knee Extension Range of Motion Deficits With Cartilage T2 Relaxation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury significantly increases the risk for developing knee osteoarthritis (OA), yet the early contributors to cartilage degeneration remain poorly understood. While range of motion (ROM) deficits after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are associated with long-term development of radiographic OA, the association between early ROM recovery and cartilage composition has not been established. HYPOTHESIS: Knee extension ROM deficits at 2 months after ACLR would be associated with worsening tibiofemoral and patellofemoral cartilage T2 relaxation times at 6 months. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 30 participants (15-35 years) were enrolled within 1 month of ACL injury and before ACLR. At 2 months post-ACLR, active knee extension ROM was measured in the supine position using a goniometer. An extension deficit was considered >3&#xb0; less extension in the injured knee compared to the uninjured side. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-based T2 relaxometry of the injured knee was performed preoperatively and at 6 months post-ACLR to measure percent change in mean T2 relaxation times in predefined tibial and femoral cartilage regions. Independent t tests were used to compare changes in T2 values between participants with and without an extension deficit. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 18.8 &#xb1; 3.9 years, and 63.3% were female. Fifteen (50.0%) participants exhibited an extension deficit at 2 months. Those with an extension deficit demonstrated a greater increase in T2 relaxation time in the anterior (mean difference, 10.21% [95% CI, 3.67%-16.76%]; P = .003) and weightbearing (mean difference, 6.14% [95% CI, 2.19%-10.09%]; P = .004) cartilage of the medial femoral condyle. No significant group differences were observed in other cartilage regions (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Knee extension ROM deficits at 2 months post-ACLR are associated with early compositional changes in the medial femoral cartilage, indicating a potential relationship between limited extension and OA risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Primary ACL Repair and Reconstruction in Isolated ACL Ruptures: Forgotten Joint Scores and the Association Between Residual Laxity and Joint Awareness.

BACKGROUND: Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has recently reemerged as a treatment option for carefully selected proximal ACL tears. However, evidence regarding patient-reported joint awareness and the relationship between postoperative laxity and joint awareness remains limited. PURPOSE: To compare joint awareness, clinical outcomes, and postoperative laxity between primary ACL repair and hamstring tendon autograft reconstruction in carefully selected patients with isolated ACL rupture, and to explore the association between residual laxity and postoperative joint awareness. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 85 patients with isolated ACL rupture treated with either primary ACL repair (n = 26) or hamstring autograft reconstruction (n = 59), with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale score, postoperative knee laxity, return to sport, and rerupture rates, were evaluated. The authors also used the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), a measure of joint awareness, to evaluate patients. A higher score reflects lower joint awareness, suggesting function more similar to a native knee. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate variables associated with postoperative FJS-12 values. RESULTS: No differences were observed between groups in postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner activity scale scores; Lachman- and pivot-shift-assessed postoperative laxity; and return-to-sport rates. However, postoperative FJS-12 values were significantly higher in the repair group compared with the reconstruction group (87.0 &#xb1; 15.0 vs 77.5 &#xb1; 14.2; mean difference, 9.5 points [95% CI, 2.8-16.3]; P = .006), corresponding to a moderate effect size (Cohen d = 0.66). Secondary exploratory regression analyses demonstrated that residual postoperative laxity was associated with lower postoperative FJS-12 values in both Lachman- and pivot-shift-based models (R2 = 0.649 and 0.680, respectively; P < .001 for both). CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with proximal ACL tears and adequate tissue quality, no significant between-group differences were detected in conventional clinical outcomes, postoperative laxity, return-to-sport rates, or rerupture rates between primary ACL repair and reconstruction. Primary ACL repair was associated with higher postoperative FJS-12 values at short- to midterm follow-up, suggesting function more similar to that of a native knee. Residual postoperative laxity was associated with lower FJS-12 values in secondary exploratory analyses.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Outcomes of Suture Tape-Augmented ACL Reconstruction in Patients With High Internal Rotational Tibial Subluxation: A Minimum 3-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts faces persistent challenges of graft failure, especially in patients with high internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS). HYPOTHESIS: Patients with high IRTS who undergo HT autograft ACLR with suture tape augmentation (STA) will have lower graft failure rates and superior clinical outcomes as compared with those without STA. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with high IRTS-defined as lateral minus medial anterior tibial subluxation >5.8 mm based on prior studies-who underwent primary ACLR using HT autografts with STA and had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to identify a control group of patients with similarly high IRTS who underwent HT ACLR without STA. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale, as well as by return-to-sport status and graft failure. Clinically meaningful improvements were evaluated by the minimal clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and substantial clinical benefit. RESULTS: This study included 62 patients with high IRTS: 31 with STA and 31 matched controls. The mean IRTS was 6.6 mm (range, 5.9-8.9) in the STA group and 6.8 mm (range, 5.8-8.7) in the control group. The mean patient age was 32.9 years (range, 20-50), and the mean follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 3.1-5.0). At final follow-up, the STA group showed significantly higher proportions of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (93.5% vs 74.2%; P = .038), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (96.8% vs 74.2%; P = .012), and substantial clinical benefit (54.8% vs 25.8%; P = .020). The return-to-sport rate was also higher in the STA group (74.2% vs 48.4%; P = .037). Additionally, the STA group demonstrated a lower graft failure rate (0% vs 12.9%; P = .039). CONCLUSION: For patients with high IRTS, STA in ACLR with HT autografts is associated with improved clinical outcomes, a higher return-to-sport rate, and a lower risk of graft failure at midterm follow-up.

Humans↗