Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42496809

Respiratory effects of recruitment maneuvers according to lung recruitability assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Dinh Van Trung·Bui Thi Huong Giang·Dang Quoc Tuan·Nguyen Cong Tan·Pham The Thach·Bui Van Cuong·Nguyen Ba Cuong·Trinh The Anh·Nguyen Dang Thu·Do Ngoc Son
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recruitment maneuvers (RM) can improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but their physiological effects depend on lung recruitability. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, regional ventilation, and cardiorespiratory adverse events responses to a RM followed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided PEEP titration, using EIT to assess lung recruitability. In this study, fifty patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS underwent a stepwise RM followed by individualized PEEP titration guided by EIT. Lung recruitability was determined using the collapse index at PEEP 6 cmH&#x2082;O (CLPEEP6), defined as the proportion of collapsed lung at this PEEP level. Patients were classified into high- and low-recruitability groups based on median CLPEEP6 values. Oxygenation (PaO&#x2082;/FiO&#x2082;), static compliance (Cstat), driving pressure (Pdriv), regional ventilation distribution, and cardiorespiratory adverse events were compared before and after RM, during subsequent individualized EIT-guided PEEP titration. In patients with high recruitability (CLPEEP6&#x2009;>&#x2009;12.5), the PaO&#x2082;/FiO&#x2082; ratio and Cstat increased significantly after RM (PaO&#x2082;/FiO&#x2082;: 100.8&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;30.3 vs. 125.4&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;38.3&#xa0;mmHg, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05; Cstat: 21.5&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;5.8 vs. 28.0&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;7.0&#xa0;mL/cmH&#x2082;O, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), Pdriv decreased (19.1&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.5 vs. 15.6&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;3.2 cmH&#x2082;O, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). EIT demonstrated a posterior redistribution of ventilation after RM. In contrast, patients with low recruitability (CLPEEP6&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;12.5) showed no significant mechanical or oxygenation improvement and transient hypotension, arrhythmia, and desaturation appeared numerically more common in this group. No barotrauma or cardiac arrest occurred, and ICU mortality was similar between groups. A strategy combining a RM with subsequent individualized EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with improved oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with high lung recruitability, whereas patients with low recruitability showed limited physiological benefit, with cardiorespiratory adverse events appearing numerically more frequent. The EIT-derived CLPEEP6 index represents a feasible and clinically applicable https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06733168.

Explore related subjects

HumansRespiratory Distress SyndromeElectric ImpedanceFemaleTomographyPositive-Pressure RespirationMaleRespiratory MechanicsMiddle AgedLungAgedOxygenAdultARDSElectrical impedance tomographyRecruitabilityRecruitment maneuverJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dinh Van Trung, Bui Thi Huong Giang, Dang Quoc Tuan, Nguyen Cong Tan, Pham The Thach, Bui Van Cuong, Nguyen Ba Cuong, Trinh The Anh, Nguyen Dang Thu, Do Ngoc Son. 2026-07-24. Respiratory effects of recruitment maneuvers according to lung recruitability assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01473-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resourceAdult subjectAged subjectElectric Impedance subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectLung subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectOxygen subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Interventions with a significant mortality difference in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and comparison with Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a high mortality rate. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines are the worldwide reference for clinicians in management of ARDS. Mortality represents one of the most important outcomes in intensive care practice and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) the highest level of evidence. We compared Guidelines recommendations with RCT results to highlight differences and find potential new therapeutic opportunities. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all RCTs reporting a statistically significant mortality difference in ARDS and a subsequent comparison with ESICM and ATS Guidelines recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 33 RCTs and 23 interventions with mortality difference in ARDS patients. Seven interventions relate to invasive ventilation strategies, two to noninvasive ventilation strategies, one to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), 12 to drugs and one to nutritional support. In 25/33 (76%) RCTs the intervention was associated with mortality reduction and in 8/33 with mortality increase (24%). Multicenter studies were 24/33 (73%) while blinding was adopted in 19/33 (58%) studies. Guidelines recommendations supported by RCTs with mortality impact include: the use of low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, venovenous ECMO, steroids and the avoidance of high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Eight of the interventions identified were not mentioned by Guidelines but demonstrated reduced mortality, and five further interventions demonstrated increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights potential gaps between RCTs results and Guidelines that could be used to plan future research or highlight topics to be discussed in future Guidelines.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Hyper-oncotic albumin administration reduces mortality in acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome compared to crystalloid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between albumin administration as volume replacement and mortality in adult ARDS patients, we performed this meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science databases and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 12 December 2024. We screened trials that included adult ARDS patients and compared albumin with crystalloid. The 28-day mortality served as the primary endpoint, while the oxygenation change, the length of ICU stay and the length of hospital stay were designated as secondary outcomes. To clarify the differing concentrations of albumin, we formed two distinct subgroups: the hyper-oncotic albumin subgroup (&#x2265;20%) and the iso-oncotic albumin subgroup (4%&#x223c;5%). Statistical synthesis was performed with Cochrane Review Manager 5.4.1, employing random-effects models. To mitigate random errors, TSA was implemented with &#x3b1;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05 and &#x3b2;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.20 parameters. RESULTS: The analysis incorporated 5 publications: 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-randomized studies (NRSs). Overall mortality was lower in the albumin group (33.2%, 97/292) than in the crystalloid group (44.9%, 133/296) (OR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.43-0.85, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004). RCTs (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;204) showed no benefit (OR = 0.83, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.54), but NRSs (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;384) demonstrated reduced mortality (OR = 0.52, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002). Hyper-oncotic albumin was associated with lower mortality in NRSs (OR = 0.40, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.02) but not in RCTs (OR = 0.74, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.57). Iso-oncotic albumin showed no benefit (OR = 0.88, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.72). Regarding the impact of albumin on oxygenation, significant improvements in oxygenation were observed only on the first (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05) and second days (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). The TSA indicated a continued need for high-quality RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that hyper-oncotic albumin may reduce mortality and improve early oxygenation in ARDS patients compared to crystalloids. Larger RCTs are urgently needed to validate these findings and define their potential role in clinical management.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Resistance versus concurrent training with three assigned protein targets in middle-aged and older women: a randomized 2 &#xd7; 3 factorial trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding whether assigned protein targets modify responses to resistance training (RT) alone or to the same RT program plus cycling (concurrent training [CT]) in middle-aged and older women. This randomized 2&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;3 factorial trial examined bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived skeletal muscle mass (SMM; primary outcome), other body composition outcomes, muscular and functional performance, and cycle-derived estimated VO&#x2082;max. METHODS: In this randomized 2&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;3 factorial trial, 108 women aged 40-77 years were assigned to 12 weeks of supervised RT or CT (identical RT followed by cycling) and protein targets of 0.8, 1.6, or 2.2 g&#xb7;kg-1&#xb7;d-1. Baseline-adjusted ANCOVA tested training&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;protein interactions and marginal training and protein effects. Complete-case analyses included 83 participants. RESULTS: For SMM, no training-condition&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;protein-target interaction (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.856), marginal protein-target effect (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.726), or marginal training-condition effect (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.273) was detected. CT had a lower baseline-adjusted week-12 BFP than RT (adjusted difference, -2.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.94 to -1.14; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). RT had a higher baseline-adjusted week-12 leg-press estimated 1-RM than CT (CT - RT: -6.68 kg; 95% CI, -8.32 to -5.04; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), whereas CT had a higher baseline-adjusted week-12 cycle-derived estimated VO&#x2082;max (adjusted difference, 4.53 mL&#xb7;kg-1&#xb7;min-1; 95% CI, 3.80 to 5.25; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). No detectable marginal protein-target effects or training-condition&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;protein-target interactions were observed for the key secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No detectable differences in SMM or key secondary outcomes were attributable to assigned protein target. Compared with RT, CT favored estimated aerobic fitness and BFP, whereas RT favored leg-press strength. Because CT included additional cycling and greater exercise exposure, these differences cannot be attributed solely to training modality. Null protein findings do not establish equivalence among doses.

Humans↗