PubMed · 42441665
Pervasive HIV recombination limits the utility of circulating recombinant form nomenclature.
Abstract
The naming of HIV-1 circulating recombinant forms (CRFs)-descendent viruses from the same intersubtype recombination events, is along with the designation of 'subtypes' and 'groups', routinely used to track HIV-1 diversity. However, we argue that continuing to designate all detected CRFs as distinct entities is biologically unjustified, as many represent recombinants of limited epidemiological significance. Indeed, the mechanistic underpinning of HIV-1 recombination highlights the arbitrary nature of naming these incidental recombinants, the majority of which are rarely detected again. This underlines the need to prioritise taxonomically meaningful clades, with a focus on biological significance such as emergence events associated with significant epidemiological spread, phenotypic properties or transmission advantage.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Heather E Grant, Abayomi S Olabode, Dorothea Seiler Vellame, Art F Y Poon, Andrew J Leigh Brown, David L Robertson. 2026-07-13. Pervasive HIV recombination limits the utility of circulating recombinant form nomenclature.. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014286
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.