Dietary approaches for glycemic management in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review of Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets.

Jenna Feeley; Amalia Abraham; Nicolas Gonzalez; Rohit Parab; Laya Chadalawada; Francisco J Pasquel

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2026.06.004

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42414108

Dietary approaches for glycemic management in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review of Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets.

Jenna Feeley·Amalia Abraham·Nicolas Gonzalez·Rohit Parab·Laya Chadalawada·Francisco J Pasquel

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Specific dietary approaches for better management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) have not been thoroughly investigated. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets for glycemic management in people with T1D. METHODS: We examined longitudinal studies (cohort studies and clinical trials) including individuals with T1D who followed low-carbohydrate diets (<26% calories from carbohydrates and/or <130 g of carbohydrates per day) and/or a Mediterranean diet, while hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and/or time in range (TIR) were measured. Additional eligibility criteria included publication in English and availability of a full-text primary research article. Non-longitudinal studies, abstracts, and studies published in languages other than English were excluded. Results were synthesized narratively, and the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool was used to assess article quality. RESULTS: A total of 565 studies were identified from PubMed, the Web of Science, and citation chasing. After removal of duplicates and further evaluation, 22 studies (6 cohort studies and 16 clinical trials; total n = 3284) were included in this review. The search was initially completed in May 2024, and updated February 2026. Low-carbohydrate diets were associated with better glycemic management when compared to usual diets or baseline glycemic parameters. Studies using CGM were overall underpowered. The impact of Mediterranean diets was less clear, but generally appeared to be less effective at improving glycemic management than low-carbohydrate diets. DISCUSSION: Although structured dietary interventions for T1D hold promise for improving glycemic outcomes, further research is needed to determine exactly which dietary intervention is most beneficial for this population. The evidence provided by included studies is limited by small sample sizes and short durations; better powered, longer-term studies are required to inform clinical recommendations.

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jenna Feeley, Amalia Abraham, Nicolas Gonzalez, Rohit Parab, Laya Chadalawada, Francisco J Pasquel. 2026-07-07. Dietary approaches for glycemic management in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review of Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2026.06.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Biomarkers subject Blood Glucose subject Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted subject Female subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Male subject Systematic Review; Journal Article; Review resource Systematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Effects of intensive lifestyle interventions with calorie-carbohydrate-restricted diet versus time-restricted eating on appetite and binge eating in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

The impact of intensive lifestyle interventions on appetite regulation and binge eating in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. This study evaluated the effects of combined lifestyle interventions on appetite responses and binge eating in overweight or obese adults with T2D. In a randomized trial, 120 participants with T2D were allocated to three groups (n = 40 each): (1) Calorie-carbohydrate restriction (CCR), (2) Time-restricted eating with CCR (TRE + CCR), or (3) Control. Intervention groups received structured exercise and behavioral education based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model. Appetite perceptions (hunger, satiety, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption) and binge eating (Binge Eating Scale; BES and objective binge episodes) were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using linear mixed models. Both CCR and TRE + CCR significantly improved subjective appetite compared with the control group at 12 and 24 weeks (all p < 0.01). At 24 weeks, hunger decreased by -24.1 mm (95% CI: -35.8, -12.5) in the CCR group and -32.7 mm (95% CI: -44.2, -21.3) in the TRE + CCR group. Satiety also increased by 21.7 mm (95% CI: 9.46, 33.9) and 29.4 mm (95% CI: 17.4, 41.4), respectively. Significant reductions were observed for desire to eat and prospective food consumption. In contrast, changes in BES and objective binge episodes were not significantly different between groups at any time point. No significant differences were detected between the CCR and the TRE + CCR groups. Intensive lifestyle interventions incorporating CCR or TRE + CCR effectively reduced appetite in adults with T2D but did not significantly affect binge eating. Future research should target individuals with higher baseline BES scores to clarify potential benefits for binge eating behavior.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of time-restricted eating on markers of glucose metabolism and regulation in individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of time-restricted eating (TRE) on glucose metabolism and regulation in individuals with prediabetes (fasting blood glucose of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l or HbA1c of 39-47 mmol/mol [5.7-6.4%]) or type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose ≥7 mmol/l or HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol [6.5%]). METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 5 August 2025. Moreover, forward and backward citation searches were performed. Eligible studies were RCTs in adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, lasting ≥2 weeks, reporting markers of glucose metabolism and regulation, comparing TRE (≤12 h eating window) with a non-time-restricted control diet. Studies involving pregnancy, other fasting regimens, or non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Data were pooled as weighted mean differences with 95% CIs using random-effects generic inverse variance models in Cochrane Review Manager Web, and results are presented as forest plots. The certainty of evidence was defined using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology, and risk of bias was estimated by using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). RESULTS: Out of 2043 records identified through the database search, as well as 1249 from forward and backward citation searches, ten RCTs including 599 participants were included. The mean length of the studies was 4 months, and the eating windows ranged from 4 to 10 h per day. The pooled meta-analysis showed no overall effect of TRE on HbA1c (-3.33 mmol/mol; 95% CI -6.87, 0.20 (-0.30% points; -0.63, 0.02); p=0.06, moderate certainty). Nevertheless, following stratification by subgroups, TRE resulted in a reduction in HbA1c of 0.93 mmol/mol (-1.70, -0.17 [-0.09% points; -0.16, -0.02]; p=0.02) in individuals with prediabetes but not in individuals with type 2 diabetes (-4.68 mmol/mol; -10.08, 0.72 (-0.43% points; -0.92, 0.07); p=0.09). TRE reduced fasting blood glucose in the pooled analysis (-0.30 mmol/l; -0.53, -0.07; p<0.01, moderate certainty) as well as in the subgroup analyses in individuals with prediabetes (-0.14 mmol/l; -0.27, -0.01; p=0.03) and with type 2 diabetes (-0.48 mmol/l; -0.78, -0.17; p<0.01). Moreover, TRE lowered body weight by 1.6 kg (-2.2, -1.0; p<0.001) in the pooled analysis. The evidence was limited by imprecision arising from wide confidence intervals in some of the included studies, which may be due to small sample sizes. Lastly, the effects of TRE on markers of insulin sensitivity, beta cell function and continuous glucose monitoring measurements were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that TRE reduces fasting blood glucose but not HbA1c. The subgroup analyses revealed that TRE improved HbA1c and fasting glucose in individuals with prediabetes and improved fasting glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Future large-scale studies should investigate long-term effects of TRE in prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024523591 FUNDING: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Three authors (JS, A-DT, THA) are employed at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, a public hospital and research institution under the Capital Region of Denmark, partly funded by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Premeal insulin administration lowers postprandial blood glucose and increases myocardial microvascular blood flow in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, crossover clinical trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to evaluate whether prandial insulin timing affects vascular function in people with type 1 diabetes. Our hypothesis was that premeal insulin administration would lead to greater myocardial microvascular blood flow (MBF) via blunting postprandial hyperglycaemia. METHODS: People with type 1 diabetes between 18 and 35 years of age with BMI <30 kg/m2 underwent two protocols with a 1:1 randomised crossover design wherein prandial insulin was injected either 15 min before or 15 min after meal intake began. To provide a physiological comparison, age-, sex- and BMI-matched control participants completed one study where they consumed the same meal but received no exogenous insulin. Glucose, insulin, vascular function (including ultrasound measures of myocardial and skeletal muscle microvascular perfusion, aortic stiffness, brachial artery endothelial function) and biomarkers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction were assessed at baseline and then 2 h after meal ingestion within each protocol. The primary outcome was change in myocardial MBF within each protocol. Study personnel assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. RESULTS: Eighteen people with type 1 diabetes and 18 matched control participants were analysed within each protocol. Glucose area under the curve was significantly greater (p=0.015) in the postmeal insulin study compared with the premeal insulin study in participants with type 1 diabetes. Myocardial microvascular flow velocity significantly increased (p=0.031) with premeal insulin administration in people with type 1 diabetes and this consequently led to greater myocardial MBF (p=0.044). There were no changes in myocardial MBF within the other protocols. Changes in vital signs were similar between all protocols. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Appropriately timed premeal insulin led to lower postprandial blood glucose along with increased myocardial MBF in people with type 1 diabetes. Further work is needed to determine the underlying aetiology of these changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04730882.

Humans↗

Abstract

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Discover connections

Related citations

Effects of intensive lifestyle interventions with calorie-carbohydrate-restricted diet versus time-restricted eating on appetite and binge eating in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

Effects of time-restricted eating on markers of glucose metabolism and regulation in individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Premeal insulin administration lowers postprandial blood glucose and increases myocardial microvascular blood flow in people with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, crossover clinical trial.