Imaging techniques for assessing the hand in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease frequently associated with hand involvement, leading to significant functional impairment. Imaging techniques provide unique opportunities to visualize and quantify structural and functional abnormalities of the hand, supporting diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment evaluation. This systematic review summarizes the imaging techniques used in SSc. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted. Eligible studies included original research articles in English that applied or evaluated imaging techniques of the hands in SSc, published after 2000. Ultrasound and nailfold capillaroscopy were excluded, given their established use. Screening was performed independently by two authors. Findings were synthesized by clinical manifestations, study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 25 distinct imaging techniques were identified, enabling assessment of various hand structures, including vascular involvement, inflammation, fibrosis, calcifications, erosions, and bone marrow edema. Vascular imaging was most extensively studied, particularly in the context of Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ischemia, with multiple techniques demonstrating impaired perfusion and altered thermoregulatory responses. MRI consistently detected subclinical inflammatory and erosive changes of joints and soft tissues,. CT-based techniques provided detailed assessment of calcinosis cutis, while optical and photoacoustic methods showed promise for quantifying skin fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Imaging techniques provide valuable, complementary insights into hand involvement in SSc, often revealing subclinical disease. Despite promising results, limited standardization and longitudinal validation currently restrict clinical implementation. Future studies should focus on harmonizing protocols and validating against clinically meaningful outcomes.