Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 4223348

[The pedestal control method].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Posselt, O Maunsbach, A Olsson. [The pedestal control method].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4223348/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions: Procrustes, Euclidean, and cephalometric analyses.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the morphology of the midface differed in subjects with a retrognathic midfacial appearance (Class III malocclusions) using a combination of morphometric and cephalometric analyses. After obtaining appropriate consent, lateral cephalographs of 133 children of European-American descent, ages 5-11 years, were compared: 73 had Class III malocclusion, 60 had normal (Class I) occlusion. The cephalographs were traced and subdivided into seven age- and sex-matched groups. Average geometries based upon seven nodes (pterygoid point, PTS; rhinion, RO; posterior nasal spine, PNS; midpalatal point, MPP; anterior nasal spine, ANS; subspinale, A; prosthion, Pr), scaled to an equivalent size, were compared using a Procrustes routine. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) was employed to localize differences in morphology. Bivariate analyses on unscaled data utilizing nine linear and six angular measurements were also undertaken. Results from Procrustes and EDMA analyses indicated that although the overall midfacial configurations differed statistically (P < 0.05), only about half of the seven age sub-groups maintained significance. Similarly, only four of the nine linear measures (PNS-MPP, MPP-ANS, A-Pr and PTS-RO) and two of the six angular parameters (PTS-RO-ANS and ANS-A-Pr) tested were significantly different (P < 0.05). Therefore, midfacial morphometric variability and morphological diversity may mask statistical differences. It is concluded that the midface may be the defining craniofacial component in the final appearance of Class III malocclusions compared to other craniofacial components, including the cranial base and mandible.

Cephalometry

Computer-aided automated landmarking of cephalograms.

The computer-aided method presented is able to interpret and measure radiological structures automatically and reproducibly on a large number of randomly selected lateral head films of different film quality. For example the hard and soft tissue expression of the profile is used to discuss method, application and disadvantages. The performance of the system depends on image quality. The algorithm cannot be influenced by opacifications due to metal structure. In 90% of all cases the contours are identified correctly. Even if the image quality is poor, the recognition rate is about 84%. The selected cephalometric landmarks are placed in the right way in 85% of all cases. The constraint mathematical conditions and the high reproducibility improve the quality process of the cephalometric analysis. Recognition rates of 84% to 90% justify even nowadays the routine use of semi-automatic systems in PC-based analysis. With advancing digital radiography and improved computer performance, image interpreting systems will certainly become established.

Cephalometry

[Results of measurement of pre- and postoperative milling models of orthodontic-surgical treatment of dysgnathia patients].

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional realisation of CT by models produced by a milling machine and stereolithography has become a useful procedure for the diagnosis of craniomaxillofacial disharmonies. We used three-dimensional milling models to verify the results of operations involving sagittal splitting of the mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen models from patients with mandibular prognathism and 31 models from patients with mandibular retrognathism, made preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, were examined for three-dimensional changes of the osseous anatomical structures. RESULTS: The mandibular corpus had been shifted between 1 and 3 mm forward in the group of patients with mandibular retrognathism and by the same distance backward in the first group. In the group with ventral shifting, the intercondylar distance increased by 2.9 mm, while it decreased by 1.9 mm in patients with the mandibular backshift operation. Furthermore, the distance between the muscular processes increased by 6.6 mm in the first group and decreased by 1.6 mm in the second. The Bonewill angle decreased by 1.6 degrees in patients after ventral shifting and increased by 1.7 degrees in the dorsally shifted group. Contrary changes in the left and right gonion angle were seen: if the right decreased, the left increased. The same situation was found in both groups. CONCLUSION: We noted remarkable changes in the condylar position and anatomy after sagittal splitting of the mandible.

Cephalometry