Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis: a living meta-analysis-version 1.

Jakob Christensen; Betina B Trabjerg; Marleen M H J van Gelder; Lin-Chieh Meng; Hsi-Yu Lai; Jannicke Igland; Neda Razaz; Torbj&#xf6;rn Tomson; Marte-Helene Bj&#xf8;rk; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Hedvig M E Nordeng; Julie Werenberg Dreier

doi:10.1136/jnnp-2026-338454

PubMed · 42120066

Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis: a living meta-analysis-version 1.

Jakob Christensen·Betina B Trabjerg·Marleen M H J van Gelder·Lin-Chieh Meng·Hsi-Yu Lai·Jannicke Igland·Neda Razaz·Torbjörn Tomson·Marte-Helene Bjørk·Fei-Yuan Hsiao·Hedvig M E Nordeng·Julie Werenberg Dreier

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis compared with paternal use of lamotrigine or levetiracetam on offspring risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). METHODS: Eligibility criteria: observational, peer-reviewed studies reporting neurodevelopmental outcomes of children exposed to paternal monotherapy use of valproate vs lamotrigine or levetiracetam during spermatogenesis. INFORMATION SOURCES: the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1995 to October 2025.Synthesis of results and risk of bias: a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled HRs and 95% CI, with heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistic for any NDD.We present a meta-analysis of observational, peer-reviewed studies reporting neurodevelopmental outcomes of children exposed to paternal monotherapy use of valproate versus lamotrigine or levetiracetam during spermatogenesis. Given the major regulatory implications of paternal valproate safety, the recent emergence of new population-based data, and the expectation of further large studies, we designed this work as a living systematic review and meta-analysis that will be updated as new eligible evidence becomes available. RESULTS: We identified three eligible studies based on data from (1) Norway and Sweden, (2) Norway and Taiwan and (3) Denmark. As two studies included Norwegian data, their results are referred to as 'Norway 1' and 'Norway 2' for clarity. In the meta-analysis of data from Denmark, Sweden and Norway 1, the pooled HR of offspring NDDs was 1.05 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.27; I2=0.0%), and in meta-analysis of data from Denmark, Sweden and Norway 2, it was 1.03 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.24; I2=0.0%).In the meta-analysis including Taiwan, Denmark, Sweden and Norway 1, the pooled HR was 1.06 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.27; I2=0.0%), and when including data from Taiwan, Denmark, Sweden and Norway 2, the pooled HR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.25; I2=0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this living meta-analysis, we found no evidence that paternal exposure to valproate compared with lamotrigine/levetiracetam during spermatogenesis was associated with increased risk of NDDs in offspring.

Explore related subjects

Humans Valproic Acid Male Spermatogenesis Anticonvulsants Neurodevelopmental Disorders Lamotrigine Levetiracetam Paternal Exposure Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jakob Christensen, Betina B Trabjerg, Marleen M H J van Gelder, Lin-Chieh Meng, Hsi-Yu Lai, Jannicke Igland, Neda Razaz, Torbjörn Tomson, Marte-Helene Bjørk, Fei-Yuan Hsiao, Hedvig M E Nordeng, Julie Werenberg Dreier. 2026-09-14. Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis: a living meta-analysis-version 1.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2026-338454

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review resource Humans subject Journal Article subject Male subject Meta-Analysis subject Systematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Valproate vs levetiracetam in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is a genetic generalized epilepsy syndrome with onset typically in adolescence and a chronic course requiring long-term antiseizure medications (ASMs). Valproate (VPA) is the most effective treatment for seizure control in JME but use is limited by metabolic, cognitive, and teratogenic adverse effects (AEs). Levetiracetam (LEV) is an alternative ASM when VPA is contraindicated or not tolerated. Comparisons of the efficacy and long-term tolerability of VPA and LEV remain limited. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through January 2026 for studies in JME patients comparing LEV and VPA, and included randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies with ≥ 6 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes were seizure remission and ASM failure or treatment discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included, memory impairment, weight gain or obesity, dizziness, and overall AEs. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Seven studies encompassing 1,009 patients were included. VPA was associated with higher pooled seizure remission rates compared with LEV (344 of 574 vs. 169 of 390; RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27-1.63); however, substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.4%) limits confidence in this finding. VPA was associated with a lower risk of drug failure or treatment discontinuation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). VPA was also associated with a higher risk of memory impairment (RR 5.37, 95% CI 2.05-14.04; I2 = 74.5%) and weight gain or obesity (RR 6.40, 95% CI 3.64-11.26; I2 = 35.9%). No significant differences were observed between treatments regarding dizziness (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.37; I2 = 21.2%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates. CONCLUSION: VPA was associated with higher seizure remission rates and lower treatment discontinuation compared with LEV; however, these findings must be interpreted with caution given the substantial heterogeneity, the predominance of observational studies, and the serious risk of bias identified in most included studies VPA also demonstrated lower rates of treatment discontinuation, despite a higher burden of cognitive impairment and weight gain. No relevant differences were observed regarding dizziness. Large-scale randomized trials with standardized outcome definitions and longer follow-up are needed to define the comparative risk-benefit profiles of LEV and VPA in JME.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Bempedoic Acid and First and Recurrent Limb Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the CLEAR Outcomes Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Recently, bempedoic acid was shown to reduce MACE in primary and secondary prevention patients. Whether bempedoic acid reduces the risk of MALE in patients with PAD is unknown. METHODS: CLEAR Outcomes (Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic Acid [ETC1002], an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen) randomized 13 970 patients to bempedoic acid 180 mg or placebo from December 22, 2016, to August 14, 2019. The trial primary end point was MACE-4, defined as death resulting from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. A clinical history of PAD was reported by investigators at baseline. Two blinded vascular medicine specialists independently adjudicated MALE, including adverse events indicating worsening PAD symptoms leading to revascularization, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia. Outcomes were assessed as time to first event and total (including recurrent) events with a negative binomial approach. RESULTS: A total of 1624 of the enrolled patients (mean±SD age, 63.9±9.9 years; 915 [56.3%] female) had PAD at baseline. In patients with PAD in the placebo group, 69 (8.3%) had MALE over a median of 40.6 months, with rate of recurrent events of 4.0%/y. Bempedoic acid reduced the risk of MALE by 36% (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44-0.93]; P=0.018). Bempedoic acid reduced total MALE by 45% (relative risk, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.85]; P=0.007). First MACE-4 or MALE was reduced overall by 13% (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.95]) with consistent effects with PAD (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64-1.04]) and without PAD (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79-0.86]; Pinteraction=NS) but not statistically significant within the PAD subgroup alone. Total MACE-4 or MALE was reduced (relative risk, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.90]) overall with consistent effects in PAD (relative risk, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]) and without PAD (relative risk, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]; Pinteraction=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD are at high risk of MALE and MACE. Bempedoic acid reduces both MACE and MALE in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, with notable absolute benefits in patients with PAD. These findings support (1) the importance of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with PAD to reduce overall vascular risk and (2) the benefits of bempedoic acid in this population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Probiotic supplementation improves body composition, lipid profiles, and fatty acid metabolism in combat sports athletes during the weight reduction phase.

PURPOSE: Pre-competition weight control for combat sports athletes may alter body composition and fatty acid metabolism. Probiotics have shown potential to regulate overall metabolism; however, their specific effects on fatty acid metabolism during weight control in athletes remain unclear. METHODS: Thirty-two combat sports athletes participating in the 4-week weight reduction period were assigned to either the probiotic group (Group E) or the placebo group (Group C). Body composition, lipid profiles, and fatty acid metabolism were measured before and after the 4-week weight reduction phase. RESULTS: All the athletes experienced a decrease in body weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, and muscle mass following the 4-week weight loss intervention. Notably, a more significant reduction in body fat percentage (p < 0.05) was observed, along with lower levels of triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), specifically in Group E. Weight loss intervention resulted in increased levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), specifically acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid. Notably, Group E exhibited higher mean values for SCFAs compared to Group C (p < 0.05). Additionally, the serum levels of γ-linolenic acid and 8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid were significantly reduced in Group E (p < 0.05). In contrast, the majority of free fatty acids (FFAs) showed significant increases, with greater magnitudes of change observed in Group C (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Probiotic supplementation can improve body composition, enhance SCFAs levels, and decrease circulating FFAs in combat sports athletes, suggesting that probiotics may have a beneficial impact on pre-competition weight management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: chiCTR2400079908 (Reg Date:2024-01-16).

Humans↗