Effectiveness of kinesiologic tape in the management of postoperative trismus, discomfort, and edema in mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Akash Mandal; Sanjay S Rao; Rupinder Kaur

doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2026.03.004

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42049615

Effectiveness of kinesiologic tape in the management of postoperative trismus, discomfort, and edema in mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Akash Mandal·Sanjay S Rao·Rupinder Kaur

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared kinesiologic taping (KT) with conventional elastic adhesive bandaging in managing postoperative morbidity following open reduction and internal fixation. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at KLE Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital, 26 patients with unilateral mandibular fractures were allocated into two groups: Group 1 received an elastic adhesive bandage (n = 13) and Group 2 used KT (n = 13). Pain (Visual Analog Scale), facial swelling (standardized linear measurements), and maximum interincisal distance were recorded at baseline and on postoperative Days 2 and 5. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t tests (p < .05). RESULTS: The KT group showed significantly lower pain scores and reduced facial edema at Days 2 and 5 compared with controls (P < .05). Trismus improved in both groups without significant intergroup differences. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: KT is a safe and effective adjunct for reducing early postoperative pain and edema after mandibular fracture fixation.

Explore related subjects

Humans Mandibular Fractures Edema Trismus Female Prospective Studies Athletic Tape Male Pain Measurement Postoperative Pain Fracture Fixation, Internal Adult Treatment Outcome Postoperative Complications Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Akash Mandal, Sanjay S Rao, Rupinder Kaur. 2026-03-21. Effectiveness of kinesiologic tape in the management of postoperative trismus, discomfort, and edema in mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2026.03.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial resource Adult subject Female subject Fracture Fixation, Internal subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Male subject Pain Measurement subject Postoperative Complications subject Postoperative Pain subject Randomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Comparative safety and operative efficiency of surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for mandibular condyle fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding the trade-off between facial nerve safety and surgical efficiency. METHODS: Our systematic review and frequentist NMA analyzed studies evaluating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular condyle fractures. The primary safety outcome was transient or persistent (≥6 months) facial nerve weakness. The efficiency outcome was operative exposure time. Surgical approaches were categorized, and random-effects NMAs estimated odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Treatments were ranked using P-scores, and clustered rankings explored safety-efficiency relationships. RESULTS: Overall, 121 studies (n = 6659 patients) were included. For facial nerve safety, endoscope-assisted (EA), preauricular transmasseteric anteroparotid (PATMA), and high submandibular (HSMA) approaches ranked highest, while the retromandibular transparotid (RMTA) approach carried a higher risk. Analyses restricted to persistent weakness yielded consistent results. For exposure time, submandibular (SM), HSMA, and retromandibular transmasseteric anteroparotid (RMTMA) approaches were most efficient. Clustered ranking analysis identified HSMA and RMTMA as achieving the best overall balance between safety and efficiency. Subgroup analyses confirmed the overall hierarchy, though evidence for high-level and intracapsular fractures remains limited. CONCLUSIONS: HSMA and RMTMA offer an optimal compromise between safety and efficiency for extracapsular condylar fractures, while EA may minimize nerve injury risk where technical expertise allows. High-quality comparative trials - particularly for intracapsular fractures - are warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of photobiomodulation on pain relief and functional improvement in fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures, the most common type of trauma, can cause considerable distress to patients. Pain can not only affect the comfort of fracture patients but also delay their participation in rehabilitation training. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been associated with pain reduction and the promotion of tissue healing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PBM in reducing pain and promoting rehabilitation in patients with fractures. METHODS: This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024591373). We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science for RCTs that investigated PBM in fractures as of August 2025. The primary outcome was the pain score. The secondary outcomes included functional and healing. RESULT: Finally, 12 and 9 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. The pooled analysis showed that the one-week pain score was lower in the PBM group than in the placebo group (MD -0.74, 95% CI -1.00, -0.47, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant regardless of fracture site or acupoint irradiation. Changes in pain scores were statistically significant in both groups at different wavelength combinations. The improvement in grip strength at 4 weeks was significantly greater in PBM than in placebo (MD 5.03, 95% CI 4.29, 5.78; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in pain and functional scores at 4-26 weeks. Bone healing did not show differences between the two groups. No side effects reported. CONCLUSION: PBM appears to relieve short-term pain in fractures and improve grip strength in patients with upper limb fractures, but does not show significant long-term benefits. Evidence for mandibular functional recovery and bone healing remains inconsistent. Future studies should determine therapeutic parameters and their impact on bone healing and long-term functional outcomes across fracture types.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of OSA using mandibular advancement versus CPAP in improving cardiovascular health.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is a significant risk factor for hypertension. We assessed the relative effectiveness of mandibular advancement device (MAD) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in reducing 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and other health-related outcomes over 12 months. METHODS: In a randomized, non-inferiority trial, 321 participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk were recruited for polysomnography. Of these, 220 with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events/hour) were randomized to MAD or CPAP (1:1). We report the final outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 180 participants (MAD: 89; CPAP: 91) completed the 12-month follow-up. Median usage for MAD and CPAP was 5.5 and 4.9 h per night, respectively. Compared to baseline, the 24 h mean arterial BP at 12 months decreased by 2.3 mmHg (P = 0.200) in the MAD group and by 1.0 mmHg (P = 0.999) in the CPAP group. The difference between-groups was -0.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -2.53 to 1.39, non-inferiority P < 0.019). The MAD group demonstrated a larger reduction in asleep BP compared to the CPAP group. The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness in the MAD group decreased from 30.3% at baseline to 10.1% at 12-month follow-up (P = 0.001), and from 38.5% to 7.7% in the CPAP group (P < 0.001). The between-group difference was 10.6% (P = 0.097). No significant within-group or between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of arrhythmias and plasma levels of cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSION: At 12-month, MAD is non-inferior to CPAP for reducing 24 h mean arterial BP in participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04119999.

Humans↗