Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 41956248

Obesity in obstetric anesthesia: A systematic review.

Ioana Pasca·Leonard Soloniuk·Christopher Baker·Amaan Virdi·Mina Botros·Conor Ghobrial·Ashish Sinha
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Maternal obesity presents complex challenges for anesthetic management, with implications spanning neonatal, cardiovascular, airway, neuraxial, and procedural domains. This review synthesizes evidence on how elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) impacts perioperative evaluations, risks, complications, and outcomes, in addition to anesthetic modalities and efficacy in the pregnant population. Given the increasing global prevalence of maternal obesity, anesthesiologists must refine clinical practices, employing tailored, evidence-based strategies to mitigate risks and enhance patient outcomes. This review aims to provide anesthesiologists and obstetricians with key considerations and best practices for managing obstetric anesthesia patients with obesity. Clinical recommendations herein are based on current research and evaluated using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine for level of evidence and class of recommendation.

Explore related subjects

HumansFemalePregnancyAnesthesia, ObstetricalObesityPregnancy in ObesityBody Mass IndexPregnancy ComplicationsHigh-risk pregnancyMitigating riskObstetric anesthesiaJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ioana Pasca, Leonard Soloniuk, Christopher Baker, Amaan Virdi, Mina Botros, Conor Ghobrial, Ashish Sinha. 2026-06-20. Obesity in obstetric anesthesia: A systematic review.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Body Mass Index subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Review resourceObesity subjectPregnancy subjectPregnancy Complications subjectPregnancy in Obesity subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

The effects of haptonomy and virtual reality, anxiety, prenatal attachment and acceptance of pregnancy in unplanned pregnancy.

AIM: Unplanned pregnancies are an important public health problem that negatively affects the health of women and babies. This study aimed to determine the effects of haptonomy and virtual reality on anxiety, prenatal attachment and acceptance of pregnancy in unplanned pregnancies. Haptonomy, a touch-based bonding technique, and virtual reality, an immersive fetal visualisation tool, were used as interventions. METHODS: The sample of this randomised controlled study consisted of 217 pregnant women (haptonomy: 73, virtual reality: 72 and control: 72) who applied to the Obstetrics and Gynaecology outpatient clinics of a public hospital in eastern Turkey between July 2020 and April 2021. For both experimental groups, four interviews were conducted with the pregnant women between the 24thand32nd gestational weeks at intervals of 7-10&#x2009;days. Data were collected on pregnancy-related anxiety, prenatal attachment and pregnancy acceptance. Group differences were analysed using appropriate statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Pregnancy-related anxiety was lower, and acceptance of pregnancy was higher in the experimental groups compared to the control group (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;.001). Prenatal attachment level was higher in the haptonomy and virtual reality groups compared to the control group (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;.001). Notably, prenatal attachment scores were significantly higher in the haptonomy group compared to the virtual reality group (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;.001). CONCLUSION: In unplanned pregnancies, imagining the baby through haptonomy and imagining the baby through virtual reality are techniques that reduce the level of anxiety related to pregnancy and increase the level of prenatal attachment and acceptance of pregnancy. Especially haptonomy showed a higher effect on prenatal attachment.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Maternal prior pregnancy outcome subtype and offspring cryptorchidism: A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal prior pregnancy outcome subtype and frequency are associated with cryptorchidism in male offspring, and whether first-trimester exogenous progesterone exposure mediates any observed association. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based retrospective case-control study of 1220 mother-son pairs (610 cryptorchidism cases; 610 controls). Maternal prior pregnancy outcome subtype was defined using a prespecified proximal-event approach based on the most recent qualifying pregnancy event before the index pregnancy: no prior pregnancy loss or termination, miscarriage, or pregnancy termination. Subtype-specific frequency was categorized as 0, 1, or &#x2265;2. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression; robustness was examined using 1:1 propensity score matching with conditional logistic regression. Exploratory mediation analysis estimated indirect effects through first-trimester exogenous progesterone exposure. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, miscarriage was associated with higher odds of cryptorchidism compared with no prior pregnancy loss or termination (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 1.26-3.09), whereas pregnancy termination was not (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.86-1.52). In joint subtype-frequency analyses, odds increased with the number of miscarriages (one: aOR 1.74; 95% CI 1.07-2.83; two or more: aOR 3.77; 95% CI 1.22-11.66) and were higher for two or more pregnancy terminations (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.84). Matched analyses were directionally consistent. Mediation analyses suggested a modest indirect effect through first-trimester progesterone exposure for the miscarriage association. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal prior miscarriage was associated with cryptorchidism in male offspring, whereas pregnancy termination showed higher odds only among women with two or more prior procedures. First-trimester exogenous progesterone exposure may account for a modest proportion of the miscarriage-cryptorchidism association.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Music therapy in artificial insemination by husband: Effects on psychological distress and clinical pregnancy rate.

BACKGROUND: Infertility treatment can be psychologically burdensome. Evidence on music listening during artificial insemination by husband (AIH) remains limited. We evaluated whether a standardized periprocedural music intervention reduced psychological distress and explored its association with clinical pregnancy. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label randomized trial, 254 women undergoing AIH were allocated 1:1 to routine care or routine care plus two 30-minute music-listening sessions, immediately before and after AIH. The prespecified primary outcome was the continuous 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) score at follow-up; clinical pregnancy was secondary. DASS-21 was completed at baseline and at day 35 after AIH. Clinical pregnancy was assessed by ultrasonography at days 30 to 35. RESULTS: Continuous DASS-21 anxiety, depression, and stress scores did not differ between groups after adjustment for baseline scores (all P&#x2005;&#x2265;&#x2005;.868). Absolute postintervention differences were 0.01 point or less for anxiety and depression and 0.08 point for stress, indicating neither statistical nor clinically meaningful improvement. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 34/127 participants (26.77%) in the intervention group and 14/127 (11.02%) in the control group (exploratory secondary outcome; P&#x2005;=&#x2005;.001). CONCLUSION: The intervention did not improve the primary psychological outcome. The higher clinical pregnancy rate is hypothesis-generating because the trial was not powered for pregnancy, the proposed psychological mechanism was not demonstrated, and nonspecific attention and other unmeasured factors cannot be excluded. Replication using an attention-matched control, immediate state-anxiety and physiological measures, participant-preference assessment, and live-birth follow-up is required.

Humans↗