Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 41955081

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single-Dose Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitor, Budigalimab, in People With HIV-1 With Antiretroviral Therapy-Suppressed Viral Load.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blockade of inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on target immune cells is associated with improved HIV-specific immune function and activation of latent HIV. This randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 1b study assessed low doses of investigational anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, budigalimab, for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in people with HIV (PWH) on antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Participants received single doses of budigalimab 10 mg subcutaneous (SC), 20 mg SC, 10 mg intravenous (IV), or placebo (n = 8 per arm) and were followed for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 32 randomized participants, 22 reported adverse event(s) (AE); most (n = 19) were grade ≤2 and no grade ≥4 AE or treatment-related serious AE. Two participants reported a non-treatment-related grade 3 AE (placebo, n = 1 pneumonia; 10 mg IV, n = 1 elevated aspartate aminotransferase). One reversible immune-related AE (grade 2 lichenoid keratosis) was reported (20 mg SC). Geometric mean maximum serum concentrations were 0.37, 1.57, and 3.2 µg/mL with 10 mg SC, 20 mg SC, and 10 mg IV, respectively. Drug exposure with 20 versus 10 mg SC dosing was more than dose proportional and less variable. Subcutaneous bioavailability was approximately 53%-62%. The PD-1 receptor saturation was ≥95% in most participants (median duration: 20 mg SC, 42 days; 10 mg SC, 14 days; 10 mg IV, 35 days). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest an acceptable safety profile for single-dose budigalimab in PWH, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for 20 mg SC and 10 mg IV. Further evaluation as a potential component of an HIV treatment is underway.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tanaya R Vaidya, Till Geib, Jacob P Lalezari, Christopher Bettacchi, Cynthia C Brinson, Peter J Ruane, Heide Betman, Fei Zhou, Preethi Krishnan, Nael M Mostafa. 2026-09-02. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single-Dose Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitor, Budigalimab, in People With HIV-1 With Antiretroviral Therapy-Suppressed Viral Load.. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiag142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Changes in sexual behavior among women in studies evaluating the dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV prevention.

BACKGROUND: Access to novel HIV prevention technologies often raise concerns of risk compensation. This analysis examined changes in the sexual behaviors of MTN 020/ASPIRE participants, a placebo controlled randomized control trial, who subsequently enrolled in MTN-025/HOPE, an open-label extension using the dapivirine vaginal ring. METHODS: Both studies enrolled healthy, sexually active, HIV-negative women from Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. Longitudinal data on participants' sexual behaviors, specifically sex with a nonprimary partner (past 3&#xa0;months), and use of male or female condoms at the last vaginal sex act were compared between ASPIRE and HOPE. Conditional and mixed ordinal logistic regression models evaluated associations between study and sexual behaviors at enrollment,&#xa0;and quarterly over the first 12&#xa0;months. RESULTS: Of the 2629 individuals enrolled in ASPIRE, 1456 (55%) participated in HOPE. At enrollment, the proportion of participants who reported sex with a nonprimary partner and condom use at last vaginal sex act did not differ by study. Across all quarterly follow-up visits, sex with a nonprimary partner was more common in HOPE (13.9-18.7%) than ASPIRE (10.7-12.6%); adjusted OR&#xa0;1.47, 95% CI 1.24-1.75, P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001. There was no difference in condom use at the last vaginal act across all quarterly follow-up visits between ASPIRE (36.5-42.7%) and HOPE (43.6-46.7%); adjusted OR&#xa0;1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.18. CONCLUSION: More women reported sex with nonprimary partners in HOPE, with little change in condom use over time between the two studies. Understanding behavior changes during PrEP use allows for tailored, holistic reproductive health programming.

Humans

Tuberculosis in children who are HIV-exposed uninfected.

OBJECTIVES: 1.3 million children are born each year to mothers with HIV but remain HIV-uninfected; more than 70% of these children live in settings with high tuberculosis (TB) burden. Whether children who are HIV-exposed uninfected (cHEU) are at increased risk of TB infection and disease is debated. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of TB infection and disease in cHEU versus children who are HIV-unexposed uninfected (cHUU) and children with HIV (CWH). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and publication bibliographies through October 2025, using terms related to gestational HIV exposure and TB. We performed a qualitative synthesis and a meta-analysis of TST/IGRA positivity prevalence and disease cumulative incidence in cHEU versus cHUU, and cHEU versus CWH. RESULTS: : We included 26 studies in a systematic review and 18 studies in meta-analyses; 21/26 (81%) studies were restricted to children less than 2&#x200a;years of age. Prevalence of TST/IGRA positivity [RR 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.72, I2 &#x200a;=&#x200a;0.0%] and cumulative disease incidence (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.48-1.08, I2 &#x200a;=&#x200a;0.0%) were similar between cHEU and cHUU. Prevalence of TST/IGRA positivity (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.02-3.91, I2 &#x200a;=&#x200a;93.2%) was not significantly different between cHEU and CWH. cHEU had lower risk of TB disease cumulative incidence than CWH (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.16-0.51, I2 &#x200a;=&#x200a;71.5%). CONCLUSION: cHEU and cHUU experience similar risk of TB infection and disease, while cHEU experience lower risk of disease than CWH. Findings were limited by a lack of studies after infancy and a small number of studies.

Humans

Safety and Immunogenicity of Varicella Vaccination in Children and Adolescents Living With HIV: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Preventing varicella-zoster virus infection is important in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive persons. Varicella remains endemic worldwide, and HIV-positive persons can experience greater morbidity than the general population. We summarized the global literature on the safety and immunogenicity of the varicella vaccine in HIV-positive children. METHODS: Systematic review of original reports on varicella vaccination of HIV-positive children, published through December 31, 2024, including assessment of safety, immunologic responses and effectiveness after vaccination. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were analyzed. Local reactions were the most common adverse events, albeit infrequent (<21% and <10% of vaccinees after dose 1 and 2, respectively). Systemic reactions were also infrequent, consisting mostly of low-grade fever. A vaccine-related rash, reported in <5% of vaccinees, had fewer lesions and a shorter duration than typical varicella. Serious adverse events were reported only when the vaccine was inadvertently administered to children with severe HIV immunosuppression. Varicella vaccination had no clinically significant impact on plasma HIV RNA or CD4+ T-cell count after either dose. An antibody response was reported in 60%-79% of HIV-positive vaccinees after dose 2 and often declined more rapidly than in uninfected children. Cell-mediated immunity was detected in 67%-83% after dose 2. No significant differences in adverse events or short-term immune response after vaccination correlated with past or current CD4+ T-cell status. CONCLUSIONS: The varicella vaccine had a favorable safety profile and induced specific immune responses in most nonseverely immunocompromised HIV-positive children. The vaccine remains contraindicated for persons with severe HIV infection. Robust data on the durability of immune response and long-term effectiveness are needed.

Humans