Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 41862313

How do we counsel patients on short- and long-term complications after hypospadias repair? - A survey study.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypospadias correction remains one of the most performed pediatric urologic procedures, affecting up to 1/150 males born in the United States. Current studies suggest that surgical counseling has a significant impact on shared decision making, decisional regret, and long-term follow-up. However, no set paradigm currently exists for long-term follow-up or counseling. We sought to obtain consensus from established pediatric urologists the optimal content and potential short, intermediate, and long-term complications to be considered when counseling patients and parents of patients with hypospadias. METHODS: We conducted an IRB-approved survey study, which sampled the responses of Pediatric Urologists from National and International listservs. A google scholar search was performed using key words including "hypospadias" and "long-term complications." Descriptions of pertinent short, intermediate and long-term complications were identified and compiled from existing patient handouts. Survey items were then developed asking respondents to rate proposed descriptions, provide potential edits, and describe their overall approach to counseling. RESULTS: A total of 290 surgeons were contacted with 120 (41 %) responding. In total, 89 respondents (74 %) identified as male and 105 (88 %) had undergone a pediatric urology fellowship. Most surgeons described a reliance on verbal counseling (95 %) with the assistance of hand-drawn diagrams (75 %) to explain long-term care, rather than electronic or audiovisual materials (3-12 %). Of note, fewer surgeons endorsed routine discussion of long-term complications (Range 29.2 %-50.8 %) than shorter-term complications (56.7 %-89.2 %). On a Likert scale, physicians reported that they were mostly satisfied (72 %) with their current approaches to counseling. DISCUSSION: Perioperative counseling has an important yet often overlooked role in surgical care. The aim of this study was to better understand current counseling practices in pediatric hypospadias to identify gaps in urologic care and areas for improvement as one of the most common conditions treated by pediatric urologists. Our results suggest that surgeons who perform hypospadias repairs have potential to include more comprehensive discussion during post-operative follow-up. We proposed a preliminary counselling guide for these concerns which incorporates language from the most commonly selected complication description by survey respondents. Future studies will involve expert consensus and patient input to confirm the adequacy of the content, the method of delivery, content appearance, and accommodations for health literacy. Limitations of the study include small sample size and response bias. The results are reflective of the summed responses of participants and are not reflective of individual providers or practices. Importantly, this study omits the input of other advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners, physician assistants, etc.), nurses, and ancillary staff who are also crucial to hypospadias care. The proposed counseling guide represents a first attempt at creating standardization of hypospadias counseling. CONCLUSION: Surgeons who perform hypospadias repair do not routinely discuss long-term complications after repair, though are overall satisfied with their counseling practices. Better tools, such as improved multimodal counseling guides, could be used to deliver this counseling efficiently and accurately to ensure patients receive optimal long-term care. Future studies will focus on developing educational materials for short, intermediate, and long-term counseling on complications after hypospadias repair with input from patients and clinicians.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vinaya Bhatia, Zoe Guckien, Anjali N Patel, Alexa Rose, Shannon Cannon, Pankaj P Dangle. 2026-02-24. How do we counsel patients on short- and long-term complications after hypospadias repair? - A survey study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2026.105827

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The transverse preputial onlay island flap: A reliable option for repair of small-glans hypospadias.

BACKGROUND: The Transverse Preputial Onlay Island Flap (TPOIF) technique is frequently used in cases with mild chordee and small glans. This study's objective was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of this technique at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of hypospadias patients diagnosed with small glans (diameter <14 mm) and mild chordee (<30&#xb0;), underwent TPOIF urethroplasty. RESULTS: A total of 64 cases were included in this study. The mean glans diameter was 10.6 mm. The complication rate was 9.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: The TPOIF technique provides encouraging results for treating hypospadias with small glans, though larger studies are needed.

Humans

The wider erection angle in hypospadias: A neglected feature affecting surgical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Penile curvature often accompanies hypospadias, and numerous techniques have been described for its correction; however, in some cases, an abnormal erection angle may also be present, further exacerbating the perception of curvature. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the significance of the erection angle in hypospadias cases and its correlation with the severity of the anomaly. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of intraoperative photographs of hypospadias cases operated between 2019 and 2023 was performed. Erection angle was measured with a digital goniometer during a full artificial erection. Erection angles in proximal and distal hypospadias cases were analyzed and compared to data from Kinsey's subgroups representing healthy male erection angles. RESULTS: This study involved images of 68 patients, with 31 having proximal and 37 distal hypospadias. The median age of the whole group was 11 months (6-156, IQR 9). Median erection angle was 91 (63-119, IQR 11) for distal cases, whereas it was 96 (75-138, IQR 21) for proximal cases. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.009). The erection angle distribution in our cohort, including both proximal and distal hypospadias cases, skewed toward wider angles, highlighting a distinct pattern compared to data constituted by Kinsey and Sparling. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that the erection angle in hypospadias is significantly wider in proximal cases, suggesting a correlation between erection angle and severity of the hypospadias. While we acknowledge the limitation of comparing our prepubertal cohort with Kinsey's adult data, the absence of evidence suggesting significant post-pubertal changes in erection angle justifies this approach. Additionally, the use of digital images for angle assessment is not a standardized technique in hypospadias evaluation; these images were initially captured for curvature assessment. Despite these limitations, our study provides novel insights into seldom mentioned association with hypospadias - a wide erection angle, emphasizing the need for further research on its implications for surgical planning and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study introduces a wider erection angle as an additional characteristic of hypospadias particularly pronounced in proximal cases. To our knowledge, this is the first focused investigation on addressing this aspect of the condition. It emphasizes the need for further research on adults with wide post-repair erection angles to explore its long-term impact on sexual function and aesthetics.

Humans

A stent-plus-irrigation protocol after adolescent hypospadias repair: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a stent-plus-irrigation protocol reduces complication rates following hypospadias repair in adolescents compared with catheter drainage alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, adolescents (Tanner Stage II-V) undergoing hypospadias repair were randomly assigned to either a stent-plus-irrigation group or a catheter-drainage group. The catheter-drainage group received standard urethral catheter drainage alone, whereas the stent-plus-irrigation group received an additional small-calibre urethral stent positioned within the reconstructed urethra and twice-daily saline irrigation. The primary outcome was the overall postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes included urinary function and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 172 adolescents were assessed for eligibility, with 150 participants (75 in the stent-plus-irrigation group and 75 in the catheter-drainage group) included in the final analysis. Compared with the catheter-drainage group, the stent-plus-irrigation group demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.56; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), urethral fistula rate (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.51; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and surgical site infection (SSI) rate (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.87; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020). CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative stent-plus-irrigation protocol was associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, particularly urethral fistula and SSI, compared with catheter drainage alone after adolescent hypospadias repair. Because the intervention included both an additional urethral stent and saline irrigation, the independent contribution of irrigation cannot be determined in this two-arm trial.

Humans