Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 41808331

Ten-Year Update of Nurse Practitioner Service Impact on Patient and Health Service Outcomes in Emergency Care Settings-A Systematic Review.

Amanda Fox·Suzanne Williams·Natasha Jennings·Ella Marie Tomkins·Rosie Glynn·Corinne Dunningham·Kathleen Tori
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AIMS: To provide a 10-year update on the best available evidence evaluating the impact of nurse practitioner services on cost, waiting times, patient satisfaction, representation rates, and length of stay in emergency and urgent care settings. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The search was completed on January 28, 2025, in Embase (Elsevier), Medline (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Emcare (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate) and Scopus (Elsevier). The data range (2014-2024) was used to limit the search. METHODS: The search was conducted with results imported into Covidence. In Covidence, two reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal of articles, and findings were analysed using a narrative synthesis approach. Eligible studies examined nurse practitioner services in emergency or urgent care settings, reporting outcomes of cost, waiting times, patient satisfaction, representation rates, and length of stay. RESULTS: Title and abstract screening were performed on 2329 records. Of these, 236 full-text articles were reviewed, and 17 underwent critical appraisal and data extraction. Narrative analysis of outcome measures yielded mixed results, with both favourable and unfavourable findings reported regarding nurse practitioner services. CONCLUSIONS: Global evaluation of nurse practitioner services in emergency care remains inconsistent. Nevertheless, emerging evidence supports their positive impact, particularly in improving patient outcomes. To effectively inform policy, workforce planning and clinical integration, there is a need for professional benchmarks that provide clear frameworks for the evaluation of patient-centred outcomes and operational impacts in emergency departments. IMPLICATIONS: Evidence related to nurse practitioner services in emergency and urgent care clinics highlights the positive impact of nurse practitioner services on patient wait times and satisfaction; however, there is limited and variable evidence of impact on health care costs and outcomes. IMPACT: This paper recommends that evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services requires homogeneous research using consistent professional benchmarks and evaluation frameworks. REPORTING METHOD: This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting. TRAIL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420250645148.

Explore related subjects

HumansNurse PractitionersPatient SatisfactionLength of StayFemaleEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Room VisitsMaleEmergency Service, Hospitalcostdelivery of healthcareemergency departmenthospital emergency servicelength of staynurse practitionerspatient satisfactiontime to treatmenturgent carewaiting timesJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Amanda Fox, Suzanne Williams, Natasha Jennings, Ella Marie Tomkins, Rosie Glynn, Corinne Dunningham, Kathleen Tori. 2026-03-10. Ten-Year Update of Nurse Practitioner Service Impact on Patient and Health Service Outcomes in Emergency Care Settings-A Systematic Review.. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70569

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Female subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Systematic Review; Review resourceLength of Stay subjectMale subjectPatient Satisfaction subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner outcomes after completion of a 1-year postgraduate fellowship.

Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) are an essential and growing part of the health care workforce, especially in community settings. To address PMHNPs' increasing presence in community psychiatry, a 1-year postgraduate PMHNP fellowship in community psychiatry was developed with the goals of enhancing clinical competency and employment retention in underserved public sector settings. Data on 5 cohorts and 31 fellows are presented in this article. PMHNP fellows, preceptors, didactics, and clinical sites were evaluated across several time points including baseline and 6 and 12 months. The program has graduated 100% of fellows with largely positive feedback. Fellows reported significant improvements in competency across the domains of 1) assessment and diagnosis, 2) treatment, and 3) professionalism and leadership. These items were substantiated by clinical preceptors' ratings of fellows' clinical skills from 6-month and 12-month time points. Relatedly, clinical sites, preceptors, and didactics were all rated highly by fellows. After the program, 90.3% of graduates remained working in the public sector including correctional settings, community clinics, and safety net hospitals.

Community psychiatry↗
PubMed2026

Status of dementia care among healthcare practitioners in Nigerian tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Dementia is an escalating public health concern globally. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers to dementia care among healthcare practitioners in Nigerian tertiary hospitals, aiming to identify practitioner-related sociodemographic predictors and systemic barriers affecting dementia care delivery. METHODS: We collected data from May 2024 to May 2025 for this cross-sectional study in 12 purposively selected tertiary hospitals across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones. Participants included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other professionals involved in geriatric psychiatric care. Using multistage and convenience sampling, 394 respondents were recruited (response rate: 99.5%). Data were collected via a validated Dementia Care Practice Questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.84) and analyzed with SPSS v22. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and odds ratios (ORs) identified associations (significance: p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Of 394 respondents, 51.5% were aged ≥40 years, and 54.8% were female. While 62.9% demonstrated adequate knowledge, negative perceptions (51.3%) and attitudes (56.9%) were common. Despite this, 71.3% reported engagement in dementia care, and 75.6% demonstrated appropriate professional help-seeking behaviour when confronted with dementia care challenges. Practitioner-reported barriers included limited training opportunities, geographical barriers affecting patient access to dementia services, and inadequate staffing. Predictors of desirable care practices among healthcare practitioners included age ≥40 years, female gender, Christian affiliation, and ≥5 years of professional experience. CONCLUSION: Although many healthcare practitioners are involved in dementia care, gaps in perceptions, attitudes, and structural support persist. Interventions should focus on targeted training, system strengthening, and policy reform to improve dementia care outcomes.

Barriers to care↗
PubMed2026

Process evaluation of a nurse-led transitional care model (Cardiolotse) within a randomized controlled trial aiming to improve care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Patients with higher age suffering from cardiovascular disease discharged from hospital are at greater risk of readmission within 30 days. We evaluated an innovative care program providing post-discharge support and helping patients to navigate through the healthcare system. This paper reports the findings of the process evaluation of the randomized controlled trial Cardiolotse, a nurse-led transitional care model improving care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Germany. METHODS: A process evaluation, following the guidelines of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework, was performed. Semi-structured interviews with all relevant target groups were conducted to gain more insight about implementation processes. Questionnaires and medical records were used to explore mechanisms of impact and understand how change was produced in the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis with deductive and inductive categories. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses were utilized to explore quantitative data. RESULTS: Overall, the designed training programme was perceived positively by the study nurses, so called Cardiolotsen (CLs). Patients receiving support by the CLs reported positive satisfaction ratings. Interactions between CLs and patients were reported as trustworthy and reliable. A total of approximately 12,500 contacts were made over the course of the intervention. However, changes in satisfaction scores between intervention and control groups in terms of medical treatment or the interaction between medical health providers involved in the treatment could not be determined. Furthermore, data suggested reach issues with respect to office-based physicians, as regular CL contact could not be achieved with 90% of the participating general practitioners and cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The CLs served as an important source of support for the participating patients throughout the intervention. At regular intervals, they checked a patient's health status and their adherence to therapies after discharge. However, the process evaluation identified cross-sectoral communication and information exchange between CLs and office-based physicians as an implementation challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at German Clinical Trial Register, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00020424 (Trial Registration Number DRKS00020424) on 18 June 2020.

Humans↗