Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 41342498

ESC quality indicators for post-myocardial infarction care: transition and chronic coronary syndrome phases.

Baris Gencer·Cedric Follonier·Amr Abdelrahman·Xavier Rossello·Alessandro Sionis·Matthias Wilhelm·Kostantinos C Koskinas·Trine Moholdt·Demosthenes Panagiotakos·Paul Dendale·Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai·Ingo Ahrens·Konstantin A Krychtiuk·Annett Salzwedel·Elena Cavarretta·Christiaan Vrints·Felicita Andreotti·Chris P Gale·Roberto F E Pedretti·Constantinos H Davos·Suleman Aktaa
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to develop the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) quality indicators (QIs) for myocardial infarction (MI), from 1 year after hospital discharge, corresponding to transition to the chronic coronary syndrome phases. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collaborated with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and developed QIs for the long-term management of patients following MI. We applied the ESC methodology for QI development by (i) determining key domains of post-MI care; (ii) developing candidate QIs by performing a systematic review of the literature, and (iii) selecting the final set of QIs using a modified Delphi approach. In total, 18 QIs were identified across seven domains of care including (i) structural framework, (ii) risk assessment and follow-up, (iii) pharmacological management, (iv) rehabilitation, behavioural, and preventive interventions, (v) coronary revascularization, (vi) clinical outcomes, and (vii) patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: We present the ESC QIs from 1 year after hospitalization for MI, to standardize and address gaps in care for this high-risk group. These QIs are supported by evidence from contemporary literature, endorsed by expert consensus, and aligned with the 2024 ESC guidelines on the management of chronic coronary syndromes. LAY SUMMARY: Measures to evaluate and improve the long-term management of patients following a heart attack are needed. In this paper, we identified key aspects of care that can help clinicians, decision-makers and patients improve the quality of care, from one year after a heart attack onwards, and help address inequalities and variations in clinical practice.

Explore related subjects

HumansQuality Indicators, Health CareMyocardial InfarctionTime FactorsChronic DiseaseSecondary PreventionEuropeDelphi TechniqueTreatment OutcomeCardiologyRisk AssessmentGuidelinesImplementation sciencesMyocardial infarctionQuality improvementQuality of careSecondary preventionJournal ArticleSystematic Review

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Baris Gencer, Cedric Follonier, Amr Abdelrahman, Xavier Rossello, Alessandro Sionis, Matthias Wilhelm, Kostantinos C Koskinas, Trine Moholdt, Demosthenes Panagiotakos, Paul Dendale, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Ingo Ahrens, Konstantin A Krychtiuk, Annett Salzwedel, Elena Cavarretta, Christiaan Vrints, Felicita Andreotti, Chris P Gale, Roberto F E Pedretti, Constantinos H Davos, Suleman Aktaa. 2026-09-04. ESC quality indicators for post-myocardial infarction care: transition and chronic coronary syndrome phases.. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc%2Fzwaf761

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Systematic Review resourceDelphi Technique subjectEurope subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMyocardial Infarction subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Multidomain Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction by Patient Frailty: Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the PIpELINe Trial.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is common among older patients surviving myocardial infarction, is associated with adverse outcomes, and is often perceived as a barrier to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The aim of this study is to determine whether frailty influences prognosis after myocardial infarction, and whether frailty modifies the clinical benefit of multidomain CR. METHODS: We performed a prespecified subgroup analysis of the PIpELINe (Physical Activity Intervention in Elderly Patients With Myocardial Infarction) randomized clinical trial conducted in Italy, which enrolled 512 patients aged ≥65 years recovering from myocardial infarction and randomized them in a 2:1 ratio to CR or usual care. Frailty was assessed using the Fried Frailty Phenotype, and patients were categorized as nonfrail (robust) or prefrail/frail. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models, including treatment-by-frailty interaction terms to evaluate effect modification of the multidomain CR. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular causes within 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: Overall, 350 patients (68.4%) were classified as prefrail/frail, of whom 232 were randomized to intervention arm (66%). Frail patients were older (median age, 80 [75-85] years) and more frequently female (41.7% versus 24.7%). Compared with robust patients, prefrail/frail patients had a higher risk of the primary outcome (16 [9.9%] versus 62 [17.7%]; hazard ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.89-2.82]; adjusted P=0.117). Among prefrail/frail patients, assignment to multidomain CR was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome compared with usual care (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.34-0.94]; P=0.028), with no statistically significant interaction in the treatment effect on the primary end point (P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients recovering from myocardial infarction, frailty is associated with worse prognosis but does not diminish the benefit of multidomain CR. These findings support the use of frailty assessment to guide rather than limit access to CR. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04183465.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Stratified medicine with eplerenone for myocardial infarction or injury and no obstructive coronary arteries: A registry-based basket trial.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial Infarction with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) or Nonischemic Myocardial Injury affects approximately 1 in 9 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, yet evidence-based therapies are lacking. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is implicated in the pathogenesis of suspected MINOCA, but its prevalence, prognostic implications and treatment are uncertain. The objectives are, first, to assess the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected MINOCA and, second, to implement endotype-informed stratified medicine involving patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction to treatment with eplerenone, a cardio- and vasculo-protective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. METHODS: This is a prospective, registry-based, multicenter, diagnostic study and nested, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) basket trial. Up to 400 patients with clinically suspected MINOCA and one or more cardiovascular risk factors will be enrolled into a registry-based diagnostic study. Coronary microvascular function will be assessed during invasive angiography using thermodilution. Patients with an index of coronary microvascular resistance (IMR) ≥ 25 will be randomized 1:1 to eplerenone (25-50 mg daily for 6 months) or standard care without eplerenone (control group) (n = 150 randomized). Final endotypes will be centrally adjudicated by a panel of blinded cardiologists. The primary outcome of the diagnostic study is the proportion of patients with IMR ≥ 25 during index coronary angiography. Secondary outcomes include coronary flow reserve, cardiovascular MRI parameters, patient-reported outcome measures, biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis and vascular inflammation, health outcomes and health economic assessments. The primary outcome of the randomized trial is the within-individual change in NT-proBNP at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months, based on intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes include mechanistic blood biomarkers and patient-reported outcome measures. VALUE: This registry-based randomized trial will provide novel evidence on endotype-informed secondary prevention therapy with eplerenone for suspected MINOCA.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparative efficacy of LDL-C-lowering therapies in first-time vs. recurrent myocardial infarction prevention: a meta-analysis of large-scale randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Reducing elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is central to global efforts to prevent myocardial infarction (MI). While many studies have evaluated LDL-C-lowering therapies in first-time and recurrent MI prevention, direct comparisons of their relative efficacy are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of LDL-C-lowering therapies in first-time vs. recurrent MI prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched three databases until 30 November 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 1000 patient-years of follow-up. Efficacy was quantified as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences in benefit magnitude were assessed using Cochran's Q test. Data were pooled with a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic. Additionally, we applied the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to evaluate study quality and utilized the GRADE method to assess the certainty of the evidence. This study included 22 large-scale RCTs involving 180 304 participants. In first-time MI prevention, LDL-C-lowering therapies achieved a remarkable 38% reduction in MI risk [12 RCTs; 79 604 participants; RR, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69); P < 0.001]. In recurrent MI prevention, these therapies were associated with a more modest but significant 16% risk reduction [11 RCTs; 100 700 participants; RR, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88); P < 0.001]. Importantly, the benefit magnitude between the two groups was significantly different (Q = 22.63; P < 0.001), highlighting the greater relative benefit in first-time MI prevention. Furthermore, the robustness of our findings was consistently supported by leave-one-out analyses, the absence of publication bias, high-quality GRADE evidence, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LDL-C-lowering therapies may offer a greater benefit in preventing first-time MI compared with recurrent MI.

Humans↗