Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 41080747

Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals TMEM147 as an immunosuppressive prognostic biomarker in LUAD.

Abstract

TMEM147, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein, is implicated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) progression, although its precise role remains unclear. To elucidate its function, this study integrated bioinformatics analyses with experimental validation. First, TMEM147 expression was assessed using TCGA and GEO datasets, with validation performed in LUAD cell lines. Survival analysis evaluated its prognostic significance. Subsequently, Gene Ontology (GO)/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were employed to identify associated functional pathways and interactions within the tumor immune microenvironment. Transcription factor binding predictions and in vitro functional assays (migration, invasion, proliferation) further characterized TMEM147's role. Results indicated that TMEM147 was significantly upregulated in LUAD and correlated with poor outcomes in patients. FLI1 was predicted as a key transcriptional regulator of TMEM147. Furthermore, TMEM147 expression influenced immune cell infiltration profiles and was associated with pathways involved in ribonucleoprotein biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Importantly, silencing TMEM147 significantly reduced cancer cell migration, invasion, and proliferation. These findings collectively suggest that TMEM147 promotes LUAD progression and holds potential as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lei Ding, Yi Ding. 2025-09-25. Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals TMEM147 as an immunosuppressive prognostic biomarker in LUAD.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Exploring shared biomarkers and their mechanisms in thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus via bioinformatics analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disorder, is linked to a heightened risk of multiple malignancies, including thyroid cancer. Thyroid cancer is the most prevalent malignancy of the endocrine system, and its autoimmune-related pathological features render it an optimal subject for investigating the mechanisms of their comorbidity. The molecular mechanisms underlying this comorbidity are still ambiguous. The accurate diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer urgently necessitate innovative molecular targets that extend beyond conventional pathological characteristics. This study seeks to employ integrated bioinformatics approaches to elucidate potential shared molecular mechanisms and immunological features between thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), aiming to enhance understanding of their comorbidity and identify novel intervention targets. METHODS: This study initially acquired gene expression data for TC and SLE from the GEO database and subsequently screened and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) shared by both diseases. Subsequently, we conducted Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Reactome functional enrichment analyses on these 46 shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and further assessed the activation status of pertinent pathways using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Subsequently, we employed CIBERSORTx to examine immune infiltration patterns and developed protein-protein interaction networks utilising the STRING database. We identified hub genes utilising the MCODE and cytoHubba plugins and visualised the findings with Cytoscape software. We additionally assessed the diagnostic efficacy of these core hub genes in an independent dataset utilising ROC curves and investigated their prognostic relevance in thyroid cancer through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Ultimately, we employed the Network Analyst platform to forecast transcription factor-gene and miRNA-gene regulatory networks and identified potential targeted therapeutic compounds utilising the DSigDB database. RESULTS: This study identified 46 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) commonly linked to thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which were significantly enriched in signalling pathways associated with immune-inflammatory activation, type I interferon responses, and complement pathway activation. Moreover, GSEA findings validated that immune-inflammatory and autoimmune-related pathways are markedly activated in both conditions. Twelve hub genes were discerned through protein-protein interaction networks. Analysis of immune infiltration indicated that thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus exhibit a shared characteristic of innate immune dysregulation, marked by the infiltration of myeloid cells (neutrophils, M0/M2 macrophages). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified six significant core hub genes with substantial diagnostic value: C1QB, LCN2, C1QC, LTF, VSIG4, and C3AR1. Univariate survival analysis indicated that elevated expression of C1QC and C3AR1 significantly enhances overall survival in thyroid cancer patients; however, multivariate COX regression analysis revealed that their independent prognostic significance necessitates further validation. This study predicted the interaction networks of transcription factors and miRNAs regulating key genes, with LCN2 demonstrating the highest connectivity to miRNAs, and identified candidate therapeutic compounds linked to it. CONCLUSION: This study employed bioinformatics analysis to identify critical shared hub genes and molecular pathways connecting thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus, offering novel insights into their shared pathogenesis and the advancement of targeted biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.

Bioinformatics analysis

Genetic and clinical insights into the coexistence of multiple myeloma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma from a case report and systematic review with bioinformatics analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are B-cell malignancies that rarely coexist in a single patient, presenting significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. While MM primarily involves clonal plasma cells, DLBCL is an aggressive lymphoid neoplasm. Investigating shared genetic mutations and understanding their clinical relevance in both cancers could provide novel insights into their pathogenesis and underlying molecular mechanisms, thereby informing future translational research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case report was conducted on a 52-year-old male who presented with abdominal pain and anemia. Imaging revealed lymphadenopathy, and biopsy confirmed high-grade DLBCL with concurrent bone marrow involvement suggestive of MM. Laboratory tests identified monoclonal IgM gammopathy, and the patient was treated with R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone) chemotherapy for DLBCL followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for MM relapse. A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify cases of patients diagnosed with both MM and DLBCL. Data on patient demographics, clinical features, treatment regimens, and outcomes were extracted. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis was conducted using publicly available genomic data from cBioPortal and IntOGen to identify driver gene mutations in MM and DLBCL. Functional and pathway enrichment analysis was performed with KEGG and Gene Ontology (GO) databases. RESULTS: The case report highlighted a complex clinical course where the patient initially responded well to R-CHOP chemotherapy for DLBCL, achieving remission, but later relapsed with MM, treated with ASCT and lenalidomide. The systematic review revealed 14 eligible studies in which MM and DLBCL often occur in older patients, either simultaneously or sequentially, with variable treatment responses, including complete remission, partial remission, or relapse. The bioinformatics analysis identified several shared function and cancer-related pathways between two cancers including interleukin and cytokine-mediated signaling pathways, regulation of cell cycle, neurotrophin signaling pathway, FOXO signaling pathway, Epstein Barr virus infection, and viral carcinogenesis. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insights into the dual occurrence of MM and DLBCL, emphasizing the importance of tailored treatment approaches. The driver mutations identified highlight overlapping oncogenic pathways rather than implying a shared clonal origin, and may inform future studies exploring their biological and clinical implications. Further research into these shared molecular mechanisms could lead to more effective treatments for patients with coexisting MM and DLBCL.

Bioinformatics analysis