Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 4079781

Diffraction methods for biological macromolecules. Part B.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1985. Diffraction methods for biological macromolecules. Part B.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4079781/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cross-strand side-chain interactions versus turn conformation in beta-hairpins.

A series of designed peptides has been analyzed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy in order to investigate the influence of cross-strand side-chain interactions in beta-hairpin formation. The peptides differ in the N-terminal residues of a previously designed linear decapeptide that folds in aqueous solution into two interconverting beta-hairpin conformations, one with a type I turn (beta-hairpin 4:4) and the other with a type I + G1 beta-bulge turn (beta-hairpin 3:5). Analysis of the conformational behavior of the peptides studied here demonstrates three favorable and two unfavorable cross-strand side-chain interactions for beta-hairpin formation. These results are in agreement with statistical data on side-chain interactions in protein beta-sheets. All the peptides in this study form significant populations of the beta-hairpin 3:5, but only some of them also adopt the beta-hairpin 4:4. The formation of beta-hairpin 4:4 requires the presence of at least two favorable cross-strand interactions, whereas beta-hairpin 3:5 seems to be less susceptible to side-chain interactions. A protein database analysis of beta-hairpins 3:5 and beta-hairpins 4:4 indicates that the former occur more frequently than the latter. In both peptides and proteins, beta-hairpins 3:5 have a larger right-handed twist than beta-hairpins 4:4, so that a factor contributing to the higher stability of beta-hairpin 3:5 relative to beta-hairpin 4:4 is due to an appropriate backbone conformation of the type I + G1 beta-bulge turn toward the right-handed twist usually observed in protein beta-sheets. In contrast, as suggested previously, backbone geometry of the type I turn is not adequate for the right-handed twist. Because analysis of buried hydrophobic surface areas on protein beta-hairpins reveals that beta-hairpins 3:5 bury more hydrophobic surface area than beta-hairpins 4:4, we suggest that the right-handed twist observed in beta-hairpin 3:5 allows a better packing of side chains and that this may also contribute to its higher intrinsic stability.

Macromolecular Substances

The branchpoint residue is recognized during commitment complex formation before being bulged out of the U2 snRNA-pre-mRNA duplex.

We have analyzed the mechanism of branchpoint nucleotide selection during the first step of pre-mRNA splicing. It has previously been proposed that the branchpoint is selected as an adenosine residue bulged out of an RNA helix formed by the U2 snRNA-pre-mRNA base pairing. Although compatible with this bulge hypothesis, available data from both yeast and mammalian systems did not rule out alternative structures for the branch nucleotide. Mutating the residue preceding the branchpoint nucleotide in our reporter construct conferred a splicing defect that was suppressed in vivo by the complementary U2 snRNA mutants. In contrast, substitutions on the 3' side of the branchpoint could be suppressed by complementary U2 snRNA mutants only in a weakened intron context. To test why the identity of the branch nucleotide was important for its selection, we analyzed the effect of substitutions at this position on spliceosome assembly. We observed that these mutations block the formation of one of the two commitment complexes. Our results demonstrate that yeast branchpoint selection occurs in multiple steps. The nature of the branch residue is recognized, in the absence of U2 snRNA, during commitment complex formation. Then, base pairing with U2 snRNA constrains this residue into a bulge conformation.

Macromolecular Substances