Impact of laboratory-driven proactive reanalysis: Reclassification to positive in 5% of initially negative or uncertain exome sequencing cases.

Meghan C Towne; Jennifer Huang; Sheila Saliganan; Brooklynn Gasser; Melissa Holman; Kendra Webb; Bess Wayburn; Kelly Radtke; Kelly D Farwell Hagman

doi:10.1016/j.gim.2025.101464

PubMed · 40417745

Impact of laboratory-driven proactive reanalysis: Reclassification to positive in 5% of initially negative or uncertain exome sequencing cases.

Meghan C Towne·Jennifer Huang·Sheila Saliganan·Brooklynn Gasser·Melissa Holman·Kendra Webb·Bess Wayburn·Kelly Radtke·Kelly D Farwell Hagman

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reanalysis of exome sequencing (ES) data increases diagnostic utility; however, there is no consensus on when and under what circumstances reanalysis should occur. Requesting and performing ES reanalysis burdens both clinical and laboratory workflows. Maximizing the potential for reclassification is essential. Here, we describe the impact of a laboratory-driven proactive reanalysis process that triggers reanalysis when new evidence is identified. METHODS: We reviewed reanalysis outcomes of an ES cohort. Reanalysis events were categorized based on initiating factors (laboratory-driven proactive, family studies, and clinician-initiated). Laboratory-driven proactive reclassifications are prompted by systematic review of new scientific data. Outcomes were evaluated by initiating factors, reclassification types, evidence used, and time since original report. RESULTS: Overall, 23% of cases underwent at least 1 reanalysis, with 35% of reanalyses resulting in reclassification. There was a 4% increase in diagnostic yield, including 5% of initially unsolved ES receiving diagnostic reports. Diagnostic reclassifications rates were significantly higher for laboratory-driven proactive reanalyses (54%; P < .0001) than family studies (18%) and clinician-initiated reanalyses (4%). New gene-disease relationships were the most efficacious evidence source. Laboratory-driven proactive reclassifications occurred steadily over time. CONCLUSION: Laboratory-driven proactive reanalysis effectively provides more diagnostic reclassifications compared with clinician-initiated reanalysis. Laboratories should curate and integrate emerging evidence into ES reanalysis.

Explore related subjects

Humans Exome Sequencing Exome Genetic Testing Laboratories Exome sequencing Gene-disease validity Reanalysis Reclassification Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Meghan C Towne, Jennifer Huang, Sheila Saliganan, Brooklynn Gasser, Melissa Holman, Kendra Webb, Bess Wayburn, Kelly Radtke, Kelly D Farwell Hagman. 2025-05-22. Impact of laboratory-driven proactive reanalysis: Reclassification to positive in 5% of initially negative or uncertain exome sequencing cases.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101464

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2027

Global Genomic Surveillance.

Global genomic surveillance has emerged as a foundational pillar of public health in the twenty-first century, enabling real-time tracking of pathogen evolution and informing outbreak response. This chapter examines the strategic architecture of global genomic surveillance, focusing on its application to arboviruses such as chikungunya virus (CHIKV). It explores the integration of genomic data with epidemiological, clinical, and environmental information within a One Health framework, while addressing critical challenges in governance, equity, and interoperability. The discussion covers the entire genomic surveillance workflow, from sample collection and sequencing to bioinformatic analysis and phylogenetic inference, and highlights the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predictive surveillance. By analyzing global initiatives, operational barriers, and emerging technologies, this chapter underscores the necessity of sustainable, equitable, and interoperable genomic systems to proactively address current and future infectious disease threats.

Humans↗

PubMed2027

Systematic Dissection of Key Driver Perturbation Signatures in Single Cells via ECCITE-seq.

CRISPR screens, such as expanded CRISPR-compatible cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (ECCITE-seq), enable the simultaneous measurement of transcriptomes, gRNA identity, and cell-surface protein expression at single-cell resolution to systematically interrogate gene function. This platform provides a powerful and scalable experimental approach for validating disease-associated regulators identified by large-scale association studies and other computational methods, including network-based analyses of multi-omics data. Here, as an example application, we describe an ECCITE-seq framework to characterize the transcriptomic consequences of perturbing multiple neuronal key driver genes associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neurons. More broadly, by integrating customized pooled gRNA libraries with different CRISPR effectors across multiple cell types, this approach allows for the assessment of the regulatory impact of candidate genes implicated in development and disease processes.

Humans↗

PubMed2027

Identification of Genome-Wide Chromatin Structural Aberration in Cancer by Hi-C Analysis.

Aberrant three-dimensional genome organization is a hallmark of cancer, often driving oncogene activation through mechanisms such as enhancer hijacking. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) maps these interactions on a genome-wide scale. Unlike earlier dilution-based methods, in situ Hi-C performs proximity ligation within intact nuclei, minimizing random ligation noise and enabling fine-scale structure detection. This chapter describes an optimized in situ Hi-C protocol tailored for cancer cell lines using MboI digestion and biotin-mediated pull-down to generate high-complexity libraries. We further outline a computational workflow that extends beyond standard topological mapping of compartments and topologically associating domains to identify cancer-specific aberrations. Specifically, we focus on detecting chromosomal rearrangements (structural variants) and characterizing the distinct circular topology of extrachromosomal DNA. This integrated experimental and analytical framework provides the necessary tools to dissect the spatial dysregulation underlying tumor evolution.

Humans↗