Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 4020519

Distance perception with holographically reconstructed objects.

A H Frey·R D Frey
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It has been assumed that a holographically reconstructed object is seen as though it is the actual object, including that it is seen at the distance of the actual object when it was holographed. A psychophysical experiment was carried out with seven subjects to test this assumption. The results clearly show that the perceived distances of holographically reconstructed objects are not equivalent to the perceived distances of actual objects. Thus a fundamental assumption in holography has not been supported by experimental data.

Explore related subjects

Distance PerceptionHolographyHumansModels, StructuralJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Frey, R D Frey. 1985. Distance perception with holographically reconstructed objects.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.001217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Haptic interaction with virtual objects. Spatial perception and motor control.

This paper considers interaction of the human arm with "virtual" objects simulated mechanically by a planar robot. Haptic perception of spatial properties of objects is distorted. It is reasonable to expect that it may be distorted in a geometrically consistent way. Three experiments were performed to quantify perceptual distortion of length, angle and orientation. We found that spatial perception is geometrically inconsistent across these perceptual tasks. Given that spatial perception is distorted, it is plausible that motor behavior may be distorted in a way consistent with perceptual distortion. In a fourth experiment, subjects were asked to draw circles. The results were geometrically inconsistent with those of the length perception experiment. Interestingly, although the results were inconsistent (statistically different), this difference was not strong (the relative distortion between the observed distributions was small). Some computational implications of this research for haptic perception and motor planning are discussed.

Distance Perception↗
PubMed2000

Cleomedes (c. 1st century AD) on the celestial illusion, atmospheric enlargement, and size-distance invariance.

Cleomedes (Kleomedes) is a little-known Greek author (c. 1st century AD) who produced what is probably the earliest extant statement of size-distance invariance. He supported the Stoic philosophy and was concerned to discredit the Epicurean position that we perceive objects as having their true size. He explained the celestial illusion (the apparent enlargement of the sun near the horizon) in two ways: partly as a refractive effect of the atmosphere similar to angular enlargement when looking into water; and partly as a linear enlargement due to increased apparent distance in a misty atmosphere. He is the earliest extant author to offer apparent distance as a clear explanation of the celestial illusion. He attributed these views to Posidonius (c. 135-50 BC). His explanations remained at the geometrical level, and he did not speculate on sensory mechanisms.

Distance Perception↗
PubMed2000

Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback.

We investigated whether forward or side-to-side head movements yielded more accurate and precise monocular egocentric distance information, as shown by performance in a reaching task. Observers wore a head-mounted camera and display to isolate the optic flow generated by their head movements and had to reach to align a stylus directly under a target surface. Performance in the two head movement conditions was also tested with normal monocular vision. We tested performance in the two head movement conditions when the observers were given haptic feedback and compared performance when haptic feedback was removed. Performance was both more accurate and more precise in the forward head movement condition than in the side-to-side head movement condition. Performance in the side-to-side condition also deteriorated more after the removal of haptic feedback than did performance in the forward head movement condition. In the normal monocular condition, performance was comparable for the two head movement conditions. The implications for enucleated patients are discussed.

Distance Perception↗